A featured article should exemplify the goals of Bulbapedia - an accurate, comprehensive and Pokémon-focused encyclopedia. Featured articles should be picked from the very best work on Bulbapedia, although this is not the same as picking from the most detailed or the most accurate.
These are featured article candidates.
Procedures
Nominating
- Check it against the featured article criteria
- Add a
{{FAC}} invocation to the candidates section, for instance, {{FAC||Bulbapedia}}, or if the article in question is not in the main namespace, {{FAC|Bulbapedia|About}}.
- Create the associated talk page by entering
{{subst:FAC talk}} and saving the page.
- Add
{{FAC notice}} to the top of the candidate article.
Voting
To vote, simply edit the appropriate sections. Add your signature (~~~~), preferably with a comment, to the list of supporters / objectors. Remember to update the count in the heading.
Candidates
Super Effective (webcomic)
|
|
Support (6)
- This article has come a long way since its simple, stubby start. I wouldn't say it is complete—is anything here ever complete?—but it certainly contains a wealth of information. I'm at a loss to say what more could be added, and it is a shining example for what can be done to other pages flying under the Project Fandom banner. Support as nom. —darklordtrom 21:48, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
- PR approves. It's something that we don't see very often...Something outside of the regular Pokémon series. It's usually in-game articles, obviously. It's nice to see that something else has the potential to become featured and break down the walls, so to speak, against the fandom like this comic and possibly get the users to be inspired to not just work on our amazing articles and work on stubs they find interesting. --Psyライダー☮ 22:11, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
- The page is pretty good, and it's the best of its type. I dare you to find a better webcomic page! (Which reminds me, Pokemon-X still needs one.) The Dark Fiddler - You enter a poorly lit room... 22:24, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with Trom. The article has improved since it's creation.--♫Green♫ギャラドス♫Talk♫ 22:28, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
- Agree. This started out as a stub and now it has expanded alot. Also, it is one of the good webcomic articles. It has gone a long way from it's former self. --☆Coolピカチュウ! 01:32, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
- For an article based off a webcomic to evolve from a stub into a thriving article like this is just fantastic. This article really would show the effort of many different editors in creating one great article. Which is what Bulbapedia is all about. By all means it should win!--TheLastCharmander 21:03, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Object (5)
- I don't think this is worthy of an effective FAC, because there are many younger kids, and if they notice this as an FAC, who knows what could happen... ht14 01:09, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
- *facepalm* Not another forced FA of a certain page group >.> The page is decent but by no means it is good enough to earn the FA status. UltimateSephiroth (about me · chat · edits) 12:15, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- While this is a good article, I don't think it's FAC-worthy. It just doesn't stand out compared to other website articles imho. ZestyCactus 05:54, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
- I don't like the article at all. There isn't enough detail on it, and after all, it's an article on something totally unimportant to the franchise. A definite no. Dusknoir477 22:49, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
- The article is decent (The fact that it's about something a Canadian made is a bonus :P), but I don't find it good enough for FA status.-- Iron ICE (User:Cold)(page, talk) 20:17, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Other comments
|
Red (Special)
|
|
Support (9)
- I don't think we have any mang article this detailed and big and good on the entire 'pedia. True, a very large chunk of it is the new Pokémon tables, but even they are good and informative. Also, even without those tables, this is still a good article. --electAbuzzzz 12:27, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support. I like this article. It's very informational and very organized. It's not clustered, and the Pokémon images from the manga are clear. ht14 20:23, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- I approve. It is one of the few good and lengthy, in a good way, manga articles. Even though it needs a few fixing here and there. But other than that it is really good, it is not clustered or bad. --☆Coolピカチュウ! 23:01, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- I approve as well. It's informative and has some clear pictures as well. It still needs fixing though but doesn't most of the other articles need it as well? J-J-M 10:08, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- I support this one. This is a great example of what a manga character article should be like. ZestyCactus 23:44, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- I support because it isn't stubbish, it gives a lot of information on his Pokémon, and information on his character history. Turtwig A Contributions Talk 23:11, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
I support this because,He`s one of the origonal manga characters.The Aura Wolf ! 23:42, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
- Sure. I think it's good enough. R.A. Hunter Blade 22:24, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
- I definately agree. As manga articles go this is exemplary. In fact, as all articles go, I think this one is excellent. I definate yes. Samjohn95 22:43, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- I support this as a featured article. ~~Takoto - タコト 23:12, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Object (1)
- Creating this article was too easy. Barely any research would have to be done to gain information. I guarantee you that half of the info in this article was copied and pasted from Serebii.net--TheLastCharmander 19:39, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
- Try reading the info on Serebii before accusing anyone of theft. This was not taken from Serebii. --electAbuzzzz 20:01, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Other comments
|
Accepted
- 08:42, 9 May 2007 (UTC): Poké Ball (discussion | FAC discussion)
- 15:45, 5 September 2007 (UTC): Legendary Pokémon (discussion | FAC discussion)
- 01:29, 21 August 2008 (UTC): Brock (discussion | FAC discussion)
- 20:06, 29 October 2008 (UTC): The Underground (discussion | FAC discussion)
- 20:09, 29 October 2008 (UTC): Pokémon world in relation to the real world (discussion | FAC discussion)
- 06:33, 1 July 2009 (UTC): History of Pokémon (discussion | FAC discussion)
- 00:35, 2 August 2009 (UTC): Charizard (Base Set 4) (discussion | FAC discussion)
- 00:35, 2 August 2009 (UTC): Missingno. (discussion | FAC discussion)
- 00:35, 2 August 2009 (UTC): Battle Frontier (Generation IV) (discussion | FAC discussion)
- 18:11, 21 August 2009 (UTC): Ilex Forest shrine (discussion | FAC discussion)
- 20:36, 2 September 2009 (UTC): Professor Oak's Laboratory (discussion | FAC discussion)
Rejected
- 08:42, 9 May 2007 (UTC): April Fool's Day 2005 (FAC discussion)
- 08:34, 30 June 2007 (UTC): Kanto (FAC discussion)
- 15:45, 5 September 2007 (UTC): Pokétch (FAC discussion)
- 19:48, 29 October 2008 (UTC): Mew (FAC discussion)
- 06:35, 1 July 2009 (UTC): Misty's Staryu (FAC discussion)
- 06:35, 1 July 2009 (UTC): Bulbasaur (Pokémon) (FAC discussion)
- 06:35, 1 July 2009 (UTC): Pokémon Crater (FAC discussion)
- 06:35, 1 July 2009 (UTC): Starter Pokémon (FAC discussion)
- 06:35, 1 July 2009 (UTC): Mew (Pokémon) (FAC discussion)
- 06:35, 1 July 2009 (UTC): Weather conditions (FAC discussion)
- 00:35, 2 August 2009 (UTC): Ash Ketchum (FAC discussion)
- 00:35, 2 August 2009 (UTC): Ash's Pikachu (FAC discussion)
- 00:35, 2 August 2009 (UTC): Pokémon Gold and Silver beta (FAC discussion)
- 23:22, 21 September 2009 (UTC): Aim to Be a Pokémon Master (FAC discussion)
- 22:40, 4 October 2009 (UTC): .4 (FAC discussion)
