Please follow the guidelines specified in the Bulbapedia manual of style.

Bulbapedia:Featured article candidates

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.

Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcuts
FAC
BP:FAC
Featured articles
What is a featured article?
Featured article candidates
Featured articles
The path to featured status
Image:GlassOrnamentSprite.png   Start an article
Image:GlassOrnamentSprite.png   Check criteria
Image:GlassOrnamentSprite.png   Get nominated
Image:GlassOrnamentSprite.png   Featured article

A featured article should exemplify the goals of Bulbapedia - an accurate, comprehensive and Pokémon-focused encyclopedia. Featured articles should be picked from the very best work on Bulbapedia, although this is not the same as picking from the most detailed or the most accurate.

These are featured article candidates.

Procedures

Nominating

  1. Check it against the featured article criteria
  2. Add a {{FAC}} invocation to the candidates section, for instance, {{FAC||Bulbapedia}}, or if the article in question is not in the main namespace, {{FAC|Bulbapedia|About}}.
  3. Create the associated talk page by entering {{subst:FAC talk}} and saving the page.
  4. Add {{FAC notice}} to the top of the candidate article.

Voting

To vote, simply edit the appropriate sections. Add your signature (~~~~), preferably with a comment, to the list of supporters / objectors. Remember to update the count in the heading.

Candidates

Red (Adventures)

Red (Adventures) | Discussion | Nominated on 12:23, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Red (Adventures)

Support (13)

  • I don't think we have any mang article this detailed and big and good on the entire 'pedia. True, a very large chunk of it is the new Pokémon tables, but even they are good and informative. Also, even without those tables, this is still a good article. --electAbuzzzz 12:27, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Support. I like this article. It's very informational and very organized. It's not clustered, and the Pokémon images from the manga are clear. ht14 20:23, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
  • I approve. It is one of the few good and lengthy, in a good way, manga articles. Even though it needs a few fixing here and there. But other than that it is really good, it is not clustered or bad. --☆Coolピカチュウ! 23:01, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
  • I approve as well. It's informative and has some clear pictures as well. It still needs fixing though but doesn't most of the other articles need it as well? J-J-M 10:08, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
  • I support this one. This is a great example of what a manga character article should be like. ZestyCactus 23:44, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
  • I support because it isn't stubbish, it gives a lot of information on his Pokémon, and information on his character history. Turtwig A Contributions Talk 23:11, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
  • I support this because,He`s one of the origonal manga characters.The Aura Wolf ! 23:42, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Sure. I think it's good enough. R.A. Hunter Blade 22:24, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
  • I definately agree. As manga articles go this is exemplary. In fact, as all articles go, I think this one is excellent. I definate yes. Samjohn95 22:43, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
  • I support this as a featured article. ~~Takoto - タコト 23:12, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
  • It's very rich in content and is interesting. Support. UltimateSephiroth (about me · chat · edits) 22:00, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Support. This article is great, it's descriptive and accurate, one of the best of its kind.--♫Green♫ギャラドス♫Talk♫ 03:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Agree. This is surely one of the best articles yet. Alpha CuboneKing 03:29, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Support. Just looking through, this article exemplifies, I think, what we're trying to do - it's thorough, but easy to read and understand. Has a definite flow (beginning, middle, end). I like it. -- evkl (need to talk?) 15:43, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
  • This is one of the most filled manga character article! I Support it!--Maii 15:32, 21 November 2009 (UTC)Maii

Object (1)

  • Creating this article was too easy. Barely any research would have to be done to gain information. I guarantee you that half of the info in this article was copied and pasted from Serebii.net--TheLastCharmander 19:39, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
    • Try reading the info on Serebii before accusing anyone of theft. This was not taken from Serebii. --electAbuzzzz 20:01, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
    • Besides, serebii.net can't be copy and pasted from. Turtwig A Contributions Talk 13:15, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
    • In some browsers it can. —darklordtrom 19:52, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
    • I didn't mean specifically Serebii. I'm just saying its WAY too easy to get this kind of information from outside sources. And thank you, Trom. It's good to know that an admin actually knows that an article being great isn't all about how big it is.--TheLastCharmander 20:56, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
      • I don't think he's implying that... ht14 21:05, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
      • He voted for the same article I did. And that article is a lot smaller than the article on Red. - unsigned comment from TheLastCharmander (talk • contribs)
      • W/E. I'm not going to argue. ht14 21:13, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
      • I didn't vote at all. And I'm not going to. —darklordtrom 05:04, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
      • But Trom, I can see you in the support section up there. Doesn't that count as voting for Super Effective?--TheLastCharmander 05:32, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
      • This is voting about Red. —darklordtrom 05:34, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
      • Yeah I know that. I'm talking about the voting section for Super Effective. I mean, you were the first person. Obviously you think this article is a worthy FAC.--TheLastCharmander 01:33, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Other comments

  • Get a better pic of Aero (its quality is horrible when compared to other images on the article, I'm sure Aero has appeared in more than one frame) and I'll vote for it. UltimateSephiroth (about me · chat · edits) 21:41, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
    • Done. Hope it's good enough... ht14 21:56, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
      • It's excellent, thanks. UltimateSephiroth (about me · chat · edits) 22:00, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Meowth (Team Rocket)

Meowth (Team Rocket) | Discussion | Nominated on 22:40, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Meowth (Team Rocket)

Support (2)

  • It is a very detailed and descriptive article. Support.--Smartkidhen 23:01, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
  • The article is very well built and extremely full of info. Support--Pikachuawsome

Object (6)

  • Disagree. This article is decent, but by no means FAC-worthy. No movesets are done (which I'll do now), and there is no manga info. There is too much text in the summary section... not very organized... ht14 22:52, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
  • No. It's OK, but no Featured article. It's incomplete, anyway. CuboneKing 21:11, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Sorry, but No. I don't see how an incomplete article can be considered for a featured article in the first place. If the Manga section was done, then I would gladly change my veiws, but... From Samjohn95 23:25, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
  • lol, seriously? The {{incomplete}} followed right away by the {{FAC notice}} is hilarious.*-- Iron ICE (User:Cold)(page, talk) 15:54, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
    • I'm laughin about that too. That's so ironic. ht14 01:43, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
      • Same here. CuboneKing 01:44, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
  • While the page's character section is very descriptive, the manga section is very empty. Turtwig A (talk | contribs) 12:55, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Like others have said, if the article is incomplete, then how could it be a FA? Besides, the "character" section is way too long. Needs summarizing. ZestyCactus 02:42, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Other comments

I Choose You!

I Choose You! | Discussion | Nominated on 23:10, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

I Choose You!

Support (2)

  • A very good article. Has a complete synopsis, information about its publishing, and isn't stubbish. Turtwig A Contributions Talk 23:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Agree with Wig A. CuboneKing 17:42, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Object (0)

Other comments

Eeveelution

Eeveelution | Discussion | Nominated on 3:22, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Eeveelution

Support (3)

  • Probably the best Project Fandom's got. Well written and accurate. CuboneKing
  • Agree. Best fandom article, great comparison templates, support.--♫Green♫ギャラドス♫Talk♫ 00:50, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
  • it is the best of project fandom--1ted59 01:51, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Object (0)

Other comments

Accepted

Rejected

Retrieved from "http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Bulbapedia:Featured_article_candidates"
Personal tools