Do you ever browse Bulbapedia via a mobile device? Would you like to help us out? Check out this month's improvement drive, Mobile March!
Please remember to follow the manual of style and code of conduct at all times.
Check BNN and Bulbanews for up-to-date Pokémon news and discuss it on the forums or in our IRC channel #bulbagarden on

Talk:Pokégear/Featured article candidate

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search


Support (7)

  • I Think This Should Be A Featured Article. Brennan1357 7:38, 12 September 2010 (EST)
  • This is a good, detailed article that I believe deserves featured article status. Alex726 15:28, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Read through the page and it looks like a lot of work has gone into this. Support. Gengarzilla 17:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • I think the Anime section is a minor setback, but the rest of the article has a lot of hard work put into it and deserves to be featured. Pokemaster97 13:40, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • I agree, this article has a lot of good work put into it, and that I am glad to have helped. Even if the anime section needs improvement, it is a minor issue that can be dealt with if someone has the time to improve it. -Tyler53841 17:55, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • I think that it should be a featured article. The work put in is superb. Great job. I approve it.--Pokemon26 18:47, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • I guess it should be. But it still needs work in anime section.--Ash's Infernape 22:38, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
    • If that's the case, then it shouldn't be an FA. An FA displays something that is a model for other articles to strive for. ht14 23:06, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Object (6)

  • The anime section is too list like for my liking. Turtwig's A-B-Cs (talk | contribs) 16:23, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • I agree with Turtwig A. I think that if the Anime section could be rewritten or condensed so that it isn't such a big list, it would be a great featured article. That section, compared to the style of the rest of the article, is so different that it's somewhat jarring to me. PhantomJunkie 16:27, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Too many lists (which make the article seem longer than it really is), short anime section, no manga section (in PokeSpe pretty much everyone had a PokeGear, even in Hoenn). This article does have potential but it's still too early. --Maxim 17:42, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Too list-y and incomplete. CuboneKing 03:09, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Yeah, the anime section needs help, and there's no manga information at all. Needs a bit of work still. --ZestyCactus 03:13, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Like the above, and also, the tables are too wordy... we have the articles for those broadcasts too. ht14 04:56, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Other comments

Is this over yet? A month passed 8 days ago. Turtwig's A-B-Cs (talk | contribs) 11:57, 30 September 2010 (UTC)