Do you ever browse Bulbapedia via a mobile device? Would you like to help us out? Check out this month's improvement drive, Mobile March!
Please remember to follow the manual of style and code of conduct at all times.
Check BNN and Bulbanews for up-to-date Pokémon news and discuss it on the forums or in our IRC channel #bulbagarden on

Talk:Starter Pokémon/Featured article candidate

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

Support (8)

  • This article is very informative of each starter of all the games as well as in other media. --ケンジガール 07:33, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
  • The article is quite good, compared to some others. It relates to both games and anime quite well, unlike some others.--Wowy 07:36, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
  • After going through it for a while, I've decided that it does indeed deserve to be a Featured Article. It's very informative.--Kkllnn blastoise 23:55, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Support --Guardian of Earth |SGMS 2010
  • Support; This article is good well written "ehh.." trivia but still a good article.--Coolピカチュウ! 07:49, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
  • I think the article is quite interesting, and it is about most aspects of Pokémon (Games, Anime, Ect...) Elliot 08:59, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
  • I think the article is very well written, and quite informative. It gets two thumbs up from me. Alphateam7911 01:49, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Object (8)

  • While I do like this article, I feel it's a little too much of a list to be featured. First it's a long list of starters in the games, then it's a ridiculously long list of trivia points... --electAbuzzzz (TALK) 09:28, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Ditto to the above. There are much better articles out there. Aura-Knight 15:57, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Agreed. It's good, but too much of a list to be considered featured. Arceus548 17:49, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
  • There are some problems I noticed with it too - such as the fact it still claimed that Jessie's Arbok was a gift from Giovanni, while that comment was removed from the main article years ago. If that error was still in there, I wouldn't be surprised if there are other little errors it has that I didn't see. If this is to become a featured article, it needs to be less of a list, and it should have a thorough clean up. Right now, it's not featured material. Satosuke 14:23, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Agree with electAbuzzzz here.--Diby
  • Definitely not. You call this a featured article? It's OK, but it's too plain to be one of the best. User:Dusknoir477 17:16, 24 Januray 2009 (UTC)
  • Spr 4d 132.png to electAbuzzzz. It can be improved, though. Fix the trivia and a few other things, and I will change my mind. Alpha Totodile 23:15, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Meh. BLAND. No. Just fancy pictures, nothing really unique about it. ht14 02:25, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Other comments