User talk:Eternium-Z

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Welcome to Bulbapedia, Eternium-Z!
Bulbapedia bulb.png

Thank you for joining our community! By creating an account you are now able to edit pages, join discussions, and expand the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia. This is a brief introduction to Bulbapedia's rules and resources to help you get started:

  • All users are expected to follow the code of conduct and to be kind to one another.
  • If you have a question, check out our FAQ; the manual of style provides detailed editing guidance, and the wikicode page provides details about how to use wikicode.
    • You can always ask for help by contacting a staff member.
  • Please preview your edits before saving them; this helps you double-check your changes and reduces the need for repeated minor edits.
  • Use talk pages to discuss changes and resolve editing disputes.
  • Creating a userpage is allowed after you've added to the encyclopedia; for more details, see the userspace policy.
  • Sign all talk page posts with four tildes (~~~~) so people know who is commenting. This will turn into your name and the time you wrote the comment.
  • For more handy links and information, check out the welcome portal.
Thank you, and have a good time editing here!
  FinnishPokéFan92 (talk) 19:58, 31 October 2020 (UTC)  

The Preview Button

Instead of editing a page several times in a row, try using the preview button to make sure your edit looks the way you want it to. It's right next to the Save Page button. Please try it out, so as not to clog up the Recent Changes. Also, if you want to edit multiple sections of the page, make sure that you click "edit this page" at the top of the page rather than editing it by section. Thanks! --FinnishPokéFan92 (talk) 19:58, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Large-scale edits and Carbink/Diancie

Hey, for edits that are going on a large number of pages need to be approved before being added. In this case, the word "Extrateresstrial" (spelled wrongly too) is not needed as Pokémon are fictional creatures. It's redundant. Ability-related information/trivia should only be added to Ability pages and not on Pokémon species pages. Lastly, Carbink and Diancie are NOT counterparts. You've been reverted twice, do not add them back as it falls under edit-warring. Thanks. — RuiXiang95


Hello, most of your edits have either been unnecessary or already added elsewhere. Thus they have all been reverted. If you have a problem, go to the talk page of an article or the talk page of the user that reverted you. DO NOT continuously re-add what was removed. It falls under edit warring and is a blockable offense. Carbink and Diancie are not counterparts in the same way Minun and Plusle are. The "smallest rock type" trivia is already in the biology section of those Pokemon. Thank you.--ForceFire 10:13, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Do not move info from biology sections to trivia like on Dwebble. Trivia is a place for things that have no other place.
"Counterparts" are not just any similar Pokemon. Counterparts are usually in (or originated in) different versions. There's also no point to pointing out that Carbink and Diancie aren't evolutionarily related, that's obvious from the intro/evolution sections.
Lastly, do not keep re-adding things that are removed. Doing so is edit warring and can result in a block. If you have a disagreement with someone about an edit, discuss it with them instead of just continuing to add it back. At the moment, you've been on quite a spree in general, and you've specifically been re-adding several things, especially on Diancie's page. If you continue such behavior, you will receive a block. Tiddlywinks (talk) 14:35, 1 November 2020 (UTC)


As you have continued to add removed information back into those articles, rather than wait for a response (no matter how long that'll take, I was afk for a moment), you have been blocked for edit warring. I went with a one week block as you have repeatedly done this throughout the past few days and only just recently started using the talk page to settle things. We do not want the lowest/highest/heaviest/lightest information duplicated, mentioning it once (whether in the biology or trivia section) is enough. No need to say it twice (or more) in the same article. As for Carbink/Diancie, they aren't counterparts no matter how fans see it. Fan opinions does not make something a fact.--ForceFire 14:43, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Link templates

Allow me to redirect you to the site's list of link templates, because your edits leave a lot to be desired when it comes to linking articles. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 15:11, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Again, please use the proper link templates when linking certain pages. Pokemon must use {{p|this template}} and moves must use {{m|this one}}. Ataro (talk) 20:42, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
As Ataro said, when linking a Pokemon, use a template, like {{p|Pidgey}}. Likewise, when you link a move, use {{m}}, like {{m|Gust}}
Currently you haven't responded to anything on your talk page, so I'm going to ask you to acknowledge this message. If you make further edits that fail to follow this request without having answered here, you will receive a block to make you pay attention to your talk page. Tiddlywinks (talk) 00:35, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
You're still not using the link templates correctly, from what I observed. Please go through the list again, and read it more thoroughly this time. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 08:55, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
I know, I know, I've read this thing multiple times, I'm sorry. I'm doing my best.Eternium-Z (talk) 08:59, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Not that hard to read... GrammarFreak01 (talk) 05:36, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
You're still not using the link templates correctly! Please don't edit until you're sure you've read the list thoroughly. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 07:13, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Ugh, seems like I annoy you too much with the link templates. I'm sorry.Eternium-Z (talk) 13:29, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Use talk pages

If you disagree with an edit, use the talk pages to discuss the dispute. Do not continually re-add the information. If you continue to re-add removed information without discussion, then you will be blocked again.--ForceFire 08:17, 9 November 2020 (UTC)


On Bulbapedia, "counterparts" are how Pokemon that are in different versions are described. Please do not call Pokemon counterparts just for random similarities.

(Please note that I've left another comment above as well.) Tiddlywinks (talk) 00:35, 10 November 2020 (UTC)


A good majority of your trivia are simply not notable, either being faaaaaaar too specific or falling under not unique=not notable/too small of a group. And you keep re-adding the lightest Pokemon line even though it's already mentioned in the biology section. Please cease making these unnecessary additions to the trivia sections. I've also noted that almost every single one of your contributions have only been adding trivia. While adding trivia is fine, if they're notable, but do not solely focus on just the trivia sections. There are other things on the wiki that you can contribute to that is not the trivia section. Also, please preview your edits, failing to do so may see you be placed in the force preview usergroup. Thank you.--ForceFire 16:30, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Alright, I will try.Eternium-Z (talk) 16:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Again, stop adding unnotable trivia. Your recent additions are either way too specific or already mentioned elsewhere. And stop just re-adding the trivia once it gets removed, it falls under edit warring. If you have a problem with something, go to the talk page. DO NOT just re-add the trivia. Failure to adhere to this warning may see you getting a block.--ForceFire 16:53, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Also worth noting that due to similar actions, I was forbidden from editing trivia for about a year. So I insist you listen. Don't make the same mistakes I did. ¿¡Unowninator?! (talk) 16:59, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Alright, Alright.Eternium-Z (talk) 17:07, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

(resetting indent)Again, you are editing the trivia section way too much and adding unnotable trivia. Just because you made some non trivia edits doesn't mean it's okay for you to make a bunch of not notable trivia edits, that's not how it works. If you continue to simply focus on adding trivia, an unnotable ones at that, you will be blocked.--ForceFire 16:30, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

"If you were looking for"

"If you were looking for" at the top of a page like this is only meant to be used when two pages have the same name (and generally a disambiguating parenthetical). This text even has a template, which is easy to see if you look at pages where it occurs: {{samename}}. Do not use it on something like Gengar when Gengar is not even an alternative for "Shadow Pokemon" (and obviously not the same name).

Tiddlywinks (talk) 14:24, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Uh, you do realize that "Shadow Pokémon" is Gengar's category name, right?Eternium-Z (talk) 14:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
"Uh", and how do people arrive at Gengar's page when they somehow expected to be on a page for Shadow Pokemon? "If you were looking for..." means, gosh, however did I end up here, I was expecting to be somewhere else; not just, oh, there's something on this page that's sorta like another page, that's confusing! (It is not.) Tiddlywinks (talk) 22:41, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Consecutive edits

Please try to cut down on the strings of consecutive edits on single pages. They can easily clog up the edit history. Thank you. --FinnishPokéFan92 (talk) 14:57, 19 November 2020 (UTC)


You shouldn't add items like mega stones to type pages. These items do not react with the type they just happen to be related to Pokemon of that type.--Rocket Grunt 22:06, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Repeated edits

You added this "form" to Solgaleo before and it was removed before. Without explicitly looking for other examples, I believe you've pretty well done this before. ...Please don't.

If an edit you made previously was undone, it's really best if you ask about it. You can always check the edit history (using the "history" tab at the top of the page) to see who removed your edit and often why. (It's also better than people having to post on your talk page to get your attention every time you add something back just because you didn't even look.) In the case of Solgaleo, there's really no two ways about it, it's not a form, and if you had checked the edit history you would hopefully not have redone your edit. Please take better care in the future.

Tiddlywinks (talk) 04:02, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

I've noticed that, after adding evo stones like Leaf Stone (and some other items) to type pages a short while ago which were subsequently removed, you re-added them to pages in the past few hours. This is exactly what I told you not to do. And doing it on so many pages evidences a special disregard for others' input.
Last warning for this. Do this again and you will receive a block. Use a talk page if you don't agree with such removals. Tiddlywinks (talk) 15:11, 20 November 2020 (UTC)


Do not edit something you don't know. You removed the comma in Pikachu, Ph. D even though that contradicts the games. You named Marshadow's Smash attack as Dynamic Punch even though there's no reason for it to be that. Do not assume.

I'm going to add: use the preview button. In that edit to Marshadow, if you were using the preview button, you would very easily have seen your mistake with the template. In a similar vein, if you slow down and use the preview button a bit, you can avoid making several edits in a row and just do them all together instead. (Refer to the first section of this page.)

(And while I'm on tangents: please remember templates. Ones like Pokemon and moves are super basic. Though that latter one touches on your preview problem as well...)

Tiddlywinks (talk) 04:02, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Okay.Eternium-Z (talk) 12:29, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Types and items

Please stop adding items that are only related to the type because of a specific Pokémon, it does not mean they affect all Pokemon of that type (not all Fire type evolve with a Fire Stone or not all Electric type benefit from Pikanium Z). Please take all your messages on your talk page seriously, as I doubt you are, as all of your responses to your talk page messages have been very unconvincing and you continue to make edits that get you in trouble. Thank you.--ForceFire 13:49, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Second block

As you have repeatedly ignored your talk page messages about adding unnotable trivia, completely refuse to use the talk page to settle disputes, and appear to be editing just the trivia section, you have been blocked again. Please take your talk page messages seriously, as your simple responses are not convincing enough. If you have a problem with an edit, take it to the talk page, do not continuously re-add the information as it falls under edit warring.

And pay attention to edit summaries, because someone had already told you why your Moltres trivia was not notable. Your Meltan/Melmetal trivia is not notable because the category trivia is only notable for Pokemon that are not related by evolution. It is expected that Pokemon of the same evolution line share the same category (it's only noted if they share it with a different Pokemon).

If you return from your block only to continue making the same edits, continue to only focus on the trivia section, continue to not use the talk page, and continue to not take your messages seriously with unconvincing responses, you will receive a longer block. Thank you.--ForceFire 09:53, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Trivia section

You have very clearly not read you talk page nor have taken them to heart, as you have continued to add unnotable and/or highly specific trivia. Please cease editing the trivia section. There are plenty of other things you can edit that is not the trivia section. You also attempted to make a page for the movie Zarude. Please don't. We do not make pages for movie characters until after the movie airs. Thank you.--ForceFire 12:53, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Oh, okay, that makes sense.Eternium-Z (talk) 12:54, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Trivia thing AGAIN?

Now I don't know why you keep adding Trivia to the pages when you've been told to slow down but for now I see simply wrong statements being added. Wicked Blow and Surging Strikes are not the only 100%-crit moves. Ice/Fire/Electric punches ARE special in generation 1&2 for Stadium games. That's only what I found now and I'm reverting it. If anyone finds any Trivia I missed, please check it and revert if needed. For the owner of the page - check your Trivia before adding it. Go on Discord, there is a great community that can help you with that. IMHO, there's more harm you can do to articles if you don't even know about physical/special split. Itan (talk) 11:54, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Move variations

Biting moves are not variations. Move variations are moves that are almost identical despite different type or name. Biting moves is a category defined by Strong Jaw ability and they are listed on Strong Jaw page.--Rocket Grunt 15:31, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Third block

As you have once again failed to adhere to my message about 1) not adding unnotable trivia and b) not reverting others when they revert you, you have been given a lengthy one month block. I have asked you to cease editing the trivia section, yet you still went ahead and edited the section. I have told you to use the talk page to settle disputes, yet you still went ahead ran for the undo button rather than use the talk page. None of your responses, NONE. NILCH. NADA. have been very convincing to me that your are here to actually contribute to the site. Your response to my previous comment really comes off as you not even reading the whole message, nor understood it, and only paid attention to the last sentence.

A majority of your edits have been reverted due to them being non constructive the wiki. If you actually want to be seen as a legitimate editor, stop editing the trivia section constantly. Start using the talk pages more often and do not immediately revert someone if they revert you (and they will generally say why they reverted you in their edit summary, so pay attention to those. If you return only to make the same offending edits and continue to utterly, outright, blatantly, refuse to use the talk page and revert edits, you will be moved on.--ForceFire 15:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Moves in dex entries

Unless the move is explicitly stated or described specifically to be a certain move, do not add links to moves. "Jolt of electricity" and "electric current" are far too vague to say that they are referring to those specific moves. The words being part of the move's description has no bearings at all on whether the entry is referring to the move.--ForceFire 12:38, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Also, not every little thing needs to be linked in the dex entries. Just leave them as they are.--ForceFire 12:40, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Blocked, yet again

As you have repeatedly ignored my talk page comments about adding unnecessary link to the dex entries, and ignoring talk page messages is something you often do, you have been blocked for yet another month. Please take your talk page messages seriously, when a staff member tells you to stop making certain edits, you stop. You do not just continually make the edits. There is no need to link every instance of a word that appears in a dex entry.

Also, you also have the tendency to re-add your edits when they have been reverted. And I've told you before, if you disagree with a reversion, go to the talk page of the user that reverted you, do not just continually add the edits back. It falls under edit warring. Use the talk pages, that's what they are for. If you return to repeat the same offences, you will be moved on.--ForceFire 12:25, 2 February 2021 (UTC)


Please do not create a second account to circumvent a block, that has instant consequences, and as such your block has been extended for the rest of March. Please wait out your block, do not create another account. And during this time, reflect on why you have been blocked so frequently and change your editing behavior. If you create another account, this account will be permanently blocked.--ForceFire 13:27, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Recurring Pokemon

Please refer t the Notability requirements, rule #5. Recurring Pokemon are only notable if they appear more that three times AND contributed to the plot or tangentially contributed to it. Simple appearing does not make it notable. And since you have a history of not reading your talk page messages and continuing to make these offending edits, this will be the only time you will be warned about this. Do it again, and you will immediately be blocked. Thank you.--ForceFire 05:37, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

But Mew appeared more than three times, so wouldn’t that make it notable? Eternium-Z (talk) 08:43, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

It also needs to do something, contribute to the episode, simply appearing for one scene does not make it notable.--ForceFire 09:11, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Legends Arceus gallery

Please do not re-add the gallery on the Legends Arceus article. Galleries gets shrunk once the games are released.--ForceFire 05:37, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Talk Pages

Please do not post things on talk pages that are considered unproductive.--BigDocFan, Junior Admin Bulbapedia (talk) 22:16, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

  • Okay, sorry about that. I won't do that again. Thanks for letting me know.Eternium-Z (talk) 10:36, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Userspace limits

Hello. I have noticed that you have been editing the User: namespace a lot recently, and have made a total of 4+ userspace edits today. Please do not edit the userspace any more, as the userspace policy limits the amount you can edit your userpage: No more than three edits per day (by UTC), and you must contribute to the mainspace more than you edit your user page(s). This policy was instated to promote people helping out in the mainspace, and also to control strain on our servers. Bulbapedia is an encyclopedia, after all, so help us out by contributing to some articles before coming back to your personal page(s). The more often you edit in the mainspace, the more you will be allowed to edit your user page(s). Thank you. --Kai * the Arc Toraph 16:05, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

  • Okay, sorry about that. Thanks for letting me know!Eternium-Z (talk) 18:27, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Trio trivia

Stop addin trivia about a Pokémon being the only one out a trio to be a thing. One out of three is not notable, it's too small of a group. If you disagree with a reversion, don't just add it back in, discuss it on the talk page. This will be the only time you will warned about this, any further attempts at adding this kind of trivia will lead to an immediate block. Thank you.-ForceFire 09:02, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

  • Bruh

Okay then SorryEternium-Z (talk) 11:25, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

The Hyphen on the Regional Form Page

Please stop removing the hyphen after "flying" in the sentence "Additionally, there are no Flying- or Water-type regional forms that weren't already those types in their original form." It is grammatically correct to include that hyphen. Whether you consult books on English grammar ( or compare to usage on other pages on Bulbapedia (Azurill, Basculin), the answer is the same: That hyphen should be included. Exempt-Medic (talk) 16:13, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Okay, it didn't seem correct to me. I'll keep it like that.Eternium-Z (talk) 09:57, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Preview button (again)

Please remember to use the preview button to check for obvious mistakes and typos, and to avoid the need to make multiple consecutive edits. Thank you. Landfish7 07:09, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Okay, sure.Eternium-Z (talk) 10:13, 15 October 2022 (UTC)


Please do not link to games via their "non version" redirect, use the proper link templates with the proper links. Just because the newer games don't have "version" in their title, doesn't mean older games from Gen V and before no longer have "version" in their titles. That's not how that work.--ForceFire 01:38, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Accuracy and Fact-checking

Please double check the information you're adding is correct, either by confirmation in-game, or some form of reference or source. A lot of your additions, especially those around game mechanics, have been outright false, such as the player being unable to obtain Necrozma in both fused forms on the same savefile, which is entirely possible due to the N-Solarizer and N-Lunarizer being separately functioning key items, or Phione being the "only Pokémon in the core games with a different egg sprite/model" which is also incorrect, as you likely mistook Phione for Manaphy, which does have its own unique egg sprite/model. It doesn't seem I'm the only user to notice this, as a lot of your edits have a history of being reverted for inaccuracy, this can be avoided by having some kind of verification process before you make an edit. Atrius97 (talk) 21:41, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Okay sorry.Eternium-Z (talk) 06:45, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Link templates (again)

Please remember to use link templates. Thank you. Landfish7 21:51, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

3 month block

A bunch of things to go through, since you simply refuse to listen and take your messages seriously.

  1. Do not use the {{g}} template for games that have "version" in their title. It will lead to a redirect. And just because modern games no longer have "version" in their title doesn't mean older games magically don't have them as well. It does not work that way.
  2. Stop adding trivia. Period. You have been mostly adding trivia, most of them either not notable or outright false. You should not just be solely adding trivia, there are other parts of the wiki that you can edit. There is never nothing to edit.
  3. Do not overlink. If something has already been linked in a section, there's no need to link to that article again. It's redundant.
  4. Please take your talk page messages seriously. Becuase your responses do not make it look like you take them seriously, and the fact that you keep re-offending show that you don't take them seriously.

I have given you a three month block for your history of not taking talk page messages seriously and continuously adding unnotable trivia. If you return to do the exact same thing and respond with short sentences, you will face a longer block. Also, do not go and make another account to circumvent your block, doing so will lead to a longer block without warning.--ForceFire 09:14, 21 October 2022 (UTC)


I don't like the way you spoke to Force Fire after your return from your block, I would be very careful about how you speak to admin as this can be seen as insubordination and could earn you a longer block.--BigDocFan, Junior Admin Bulbapedia (talk) 09:24, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

  • Sorry, I just wanted to tell them not to make assumptions about me.Eternium-Z (talk) 11:36, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Pointless edits

Please cease making pointless edits to legendary Pokemon articles, they were fine as is. Don't just revert an edit you disagree with. Also, "forme" is an actual term for legendaries with physically different forms, it's not some made up word.--ForceFire 12:41, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Soft block

As you have completely ignored your talk page once again, you have been soft blocked for three days (with the ability to edit your talk page to explain yourself). If you want to be taken seriously, respond to your talk page messages with actual sentences (not just "yeah" and "ok") and acknowledge the messages being given to you, because your continual reversions clearly show otherwise.

I have already explained to you why your edits are unnecessary. The wording on the legendary Pokémon pages are fine, there's no need to change them. "Forme" is an actual term for legendaries with appearance changing forms, it's not something we made up.

If you continue to just revert edits and make unnecessary edits after the three day block, you will be blocked for longer than 3 months.--ForceFire 07:45, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Edit disputes

Please do not continuously add changes back in that have been reverted, as this can constitute as edit warring. You have already been well informed of this. Please discuss the changes instead of just adding it back in. Additionally, the creation trio is uncapitalized, please stop changing it. Thank you. Landfish7 20:36, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Okay, sorry.Eternium-Z (talk)
Again, please don't just add stuff back in without discussing it first. I removed the links from the move descriptions on the Dragon type page because none of the type pages (or move pages) have them or are supposed to have them. The move descriptions are meant to be the exact text pulled from the games with no wiki markup. If you disagree with it, discuss it first instead of just doing as you please. Landfish7 06:32, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Also, many of your edits are reverted because they are essentially rewriting articles in a less concise way and filling them up with repetitive and redundant links. This type of work is not essential or helpful. It's one thing to add important context that is missing, but it's another thing to rewrite something just to make it wordier when it was fine as it was. There's no need to rewrite perfectly good articles, especially without discussing it with the community or staff first. You also need to refamiliarize yourself with link templates. Thank you. Landfish7 07:08, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Oh and by the way, I would consider visiting the Editor's Hub, as it's a great place to start when looking for important work to be done. Hope this helps! Landfish7 07:12, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Preview button

Hey there, just thought I'd remind you that you can use the preview button to make sure your edits look the way you want them to before publishing changes. Please try it out! It helps a lot with keeping the Recent Changes feed from getting backed up, makes page histories easier to follow, and reduces stress on Bulbapedia's servers. Feel free to reach out to a staff member if you have any questions. Hope this helps! Landfish7 08:44, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the reminder.Eternium-Z (talk) 08:34, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Following up on this. Have you given the preview button a try? Remember we want to try and make as few edits as we can. It makes it a lot easier to follow recent changes to the wiki and to use page histories to easily see how an article has changed over time. Perhaps consider preparing whatever changes you want to make throughout the day in preview mode and then at the end of the day you can publish your progress. Give it a try and see how it goes! Landfish7 01:56, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
It's also come to my attention that you tend to edit on mobile. On mobile, it automatically brings up a preview of your edits. After previewing your edits, you can click the back button on the top left to go back and make more changes before publishing them. Doing this can prevent the need to make multiple consecutive edits. It's also worth nothing that when making larger edits, it may be easier to do them on desktop if possible. I hope this proves useful to you. Landfish7 03:23, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks againEternium-Z (talk) 06:32, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Six months block

As you have once again shown your inability to use talk pages to settle disputes without reverting others, and continued to make unnecessary, miniscule changes, you have been given a lengthy six month block. You were warned. I had, in your previous block, given you a chance to explain yourself within three days but you clearly decided not to take that chance, so you have also lost the ability to edit your talk page.

This shows that you are unwilling to co-operate with staff and regular users when you are challenged. And when you do eventually respond to comments, your short sentences and continual offences after making such an effortless comment show that you do not take your messages seriously, otherwise you would've actually learned and not make repeat offences.

Consider this your final chance. If you return after six monts and continue to make unnecessary edits, continue to edit war, continue to not use talk page messages, continue to make effortless and meaningless comments, you will be moved on. Learn from your mistakes. Don't just wait the six months out.--ForceFire 07:37, 16 February 2023 (UTC)


Please dont keep changing its Stellar form to state that it has the Stellar typing. This type does not exist as an actual type, and is only availible as a Tera type, Terapagos retains its normal typing when in Stellar form, and the page should reflect this. If you have any concerns you are welcome to raise a discussion on the talk page to discuss such changes, further reverting and insertion of false information however can be construed as edit warring. 4iamking 21:23, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

For the love of God, please stop reverting the edit. Stellar Form Terapagos is Stellar-type, not Normal-type. It takes neutral damage from all types and isn't immune to Ghost.Eternium-Z (talk) 21:41, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
It's a special terastallized state, that grants it special effects but not a type as such. If you open its summary while terastallized it will still display as being Normal type. You would be wise to listen to my earlier advice since this kind of behaviour will land you in trouble. 4iamking 21:56, 18 December 2023 (UTC)


Due to your history of edit warring and refusing to use the talk page when given the opportunity to do so after being reverted, you are hereby blocked from making edits on Bulbapedia ever again. Your previous blocks are mostly for edit warring with your last block being 6 months, thus why this one is a permablock. Frozen Fennec 21:58, 18 December 2023 (UTC)