User talk:Pikablu

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Welcome to Bulbapedia, Pikablu!
Bulbapedia bulb.png

By creating your account you are now able to edit pages, join discussions, and expand the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia. Before you jump in, here are some ground rules:

  • Be nice to everyone. It's in the code of conduct.
  • Make good edits. Preview them before you save to make sure they're perfect the first time around.
  • Use wikicode and link templates when adding content to a page.
  • Use proper grammar and spelling, and read the manual of style.
  • You can't create a userpage until you've added to the encyclopedia. It's a privilege. See the userspace policy.
  • Use talk pages to resolve editing disputes. Don't "edit war," or constantly re-edit/undo the same thing on a page.
  • If you have a question about something, be proactive. Take a look at our FAQ. If you're still stuck, ask for help. The staff won't bite.
  • Sign all talk page posts with four tildes (~~~~). This will turn into your name and the time you wrote the comment.
  • For more handy links, see the welcome portal.
Thank you, and have a good time editing here!
  リックEO (メッセージ) 11:15, 29 July 2015 (UTC)  

Pachirisu's Gender

Hello, just to let you know, Pachirisu's gender is not confirmed unless stated in the show. Just because it has the male variant stripe, doesn't mean it is a male for the following reasons: 1)a female variant hasn't appeared in the anime 2)its gender difference is rather difficult to point out since it has to do with the length of a stripe and the animator may (unintentionally) make errors regarding its length (like making it too long for one scene and too short the next). Thank you.--ForceFire 03:36, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Chespin trivia

The Chespin trivia refers to the species as a whole, not specifically Clemont's Chespin. Pachirisu is different, since it is referring specifically to Dawn's Pachirisu being the first Electric type to be caught by another main character.--ForceFire 14:41, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

And this trivia is specifically referring to Clemont's Chespin being the first regional grass starter to not be caught by Ash. It is the same thing.- unsigned comment from Pikablu (talkcontribs)
Please indent your comments with a colon and don't forget to sign. You may not sign after an unsigned template has been issued as it wil give off the wrong timestamp.--ForceFire 16:11, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
First of all....Chespin as a species was not caught by Ash, the page you are telling is Clemont's Chespin. In Dawn's Case, Pachirisu, it was the first electeic type to be owned other than Ash. What you are trying is to be added on Chespin (Pokémon) Page.... these things are different Pratik_12 Talk 16:31, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
No what I am trying to add is that Clemont's Chespin is the first owned by a main character to not be owned by Ash, on Clemont's Chespin's page.Pikablu (talk) 16:32, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
You cannot understand what they are saying. You didn't specify your trivia to Clemont's Chespin, you specified it to the Chespin species. Your trivia is right, it is just not placed to the right page. Poké95 01:06, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Okay so where should it go then?Pikablu (talk) 02:39, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

What you added was Chespin is the first regional Grass type starter Pokémon not to be owned by Ash. What you are saying is Clemont's Chespin is the first regional Grass type starter Pokémon not to be owned by Ash. See the difference? one refers to the whole species whilst the other only refers to Clemont's Chespin specifically. What you should've done was a slight rewording rather than copying and pasting.--ForceFire 05:58, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

So the reworded one can be added?Pikablu (talk) 05:52, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Yes. Try to reword it similarly to how Dawn's Pachrisu's trivia is worded.--ForceFire 06:39, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

I'm glad you're my number one fan!

But seriously though, if you have a problem with a staff member either talk to the staff member or keep it to yourself. You shouldn't exclude someone just because you don't like them. Thank you.--ForceFire 14:19, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

I was not trying to exclude you or start a problem. I was just stating off of what I saw that if you want something done around here, keep it away from you. I would say 80% of what you do is undo edits, and maybe half of them deserved it.--Pikablu (talk) 14:24, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
I apologize if this comes out rude.--Pikablu (talk) 14:25, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
And why should they keep it away from me? I get the feeling you're still mad about me undoing your trivia, get over it, what's done is done. I don't just undo edits for no reasons, y'know, I actually look at them and judge whether they're necessary changes.--ForceFire 14:34, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
No I am not still upset about that. I am upset about you deciding to shoot down every idea that comes up, which is why I said not to ask you. Progress is undone when you get involved.--Pikablu (talk) 14:36, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
And apart from your suggestions, what would that be?--ForceFire 14:46, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Here are a few. (talk) 15:19, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

1) As I said in the edit summary, single frame errors aren't notable. It goes by quickly that no one is going to notice it or care.
2) Again, read the edit summary, what it contained is not relevant to the trivia.
3) That can be seen by looking at the template above the trivia section. Anything that can be seen by looking through the page isn't really notable.
4) Again, Read the summary. Anything that happens the second time isn't notable, unless there's a considerable drought between the two.
5) Again read the edit summary. I mentioned that dodging a move isn't an improvisation. It's just dodging a move.
6) That's an edit you've made that I reverted. I've already told you why I reverted that (and it shows you're not over it). But just to repeat, unnecessary paragraphing and the Other appearances section header is to be remained unchanged, it did not appear in BW (openings/endings do not count).
7) Read Yash Sen's talk page or one of the sections on my talk page archive. Don't say an edit does not deserve it if you don't understand the context of the reversion.
8) Read the edit summary. Normal types being immune to ghost types have not been confirmed in the anime, anime=/=games.
9) Read the edit summary (of which you got the wrong reversion). It was too specific the first time (singling out Ash). Rahl's version was better (which I evidently decided not to revert).
I noticed that for all of these, you seemingly didn't read the edit summaries. Please read the edit summary for they will explain the reasons for the reversions, that's what an edit summary is for. Also, for the Yash Sen example, you do not know the context of that reversion so you have no right in saying that that wasn't necessary. If you don't understand the context of a reversion, then just leave it.--ForceFire 15:34, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Pokémon Nicknames

Please stop making edits like these. This is how the site has always listed names for Pokémon with nicknames. Changes like this must be discussed. If you change them again without discussing, this will be brought to an admin. --HoennMaster 04:45, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

The "nick" parameter should only have the nickname of the Pokémon since that's what it's for. As for evolutions, it doesn't need to pre-evo parameter since, yes it evolved, but its name is the same.--ForceFire 05:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
I only put those there so you could actually tell what form it was in and wether it was evolved or not. I've always looked at them and got confused about if it had evolved. Where can I bring up how this might actually be a good idea? Sorry for trying to fix an eyesore.--Pikablu (talk) 05:39, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
That's why there's images in the template.--ForceFire 06:18, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
And what if there isn't? Or what about when there are 3 forms to the evolution like Red's Venusaur. It's impossible to clarify based off of what is there right now.--Pikablu (talk) 13:35, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Trivia of page Ash Ketchum

Hey, I removed that point because it is false.Ash did won Trio badge in the same episode as he met the striation city gym leaders. See BW005. - unsigned comment from Pokemon master sachin (talkcontribs)

Ash begins his battle with Cilan in BW005 but does not finish the battle and win the Trio Badge until halfway through the next episode, BW006. Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 16:46, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Pokemon template colors

Hi! I'd just like to make sure you know that templates for Pokemon should use their base types, not (like this) their types when Mega Evolved. Try to keep it in mind in the future. Thanks! Tiddlywinks (talk) 02:15, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Regarding normal types immune to ghost types

I read above that according to you it is not proved in anime that normal types are immune to ghost type moves. But it has been hinted many times in DP series. In battle Zoey used glameow's shadow claw against Dawn's normal types which Dawn responded by saying that normal types are ghost type moves. - unsigned comment from Pokemon master sachin (talkcontribs)

Manga moves.

Please be sure that when editing articles related to certain Pokemon manga you do not add a move unless it is explicitly called out by someone. Moves are rarely consistent between uses in Pokespe and it is much preferred that we do not assume, even if the move seems obvious. Ataro (talk) 20:34, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

but isn't it obvious with these ones? Keldeo uses hydro pump the same way in the movies and the other three were talking about using sacred sword.--Pikablu (talk) 20:40, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Whether or not something is "obvious" is entirely subjective. It could just as well be Aqua Jet or Water Gun. And this isn't the movies, it's Pokespe, a completely different continuity made by completely different people. And while I admit that everything about Keldeo and the Swords of Justice is clearly meant to be a reference to the Keldeo movie, I'd much rather get explicit confirmation. Also, did they say "Sacred Sword" out loud? Unless they did, it could be anything. Ataro (talk) 19:40, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Again, I'd like to remind you not to do this. Nowhere were any of the Swords of Justice explicitly stated to have use Sacred Sword in those chapters. Those swords they used could be any kind of sword move. Ataro (talk) 01:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
And once again, you ignored my request. Please, do not do this again, or I will be forced to take action. Ataro (talk) 22:37, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
but you can see it be used.--Pikablu (talk) 23:43, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Not acceptable. The original message in this discussion clearly explains why that doesn't work. So read it, please. Ataro (talk) 01:24, 8 March 2017 (UTC)


I do not know what your problem with me is, but please cut it out, especially since it's effecting the site. So please change your edit on Alain's Charizard's page back now, as it is completely unnecessary and it shouldn't be there. Playerking95 (talk) 06:07, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

It was adding a link. I have no issue with you and don't see why you think that. Sorry to irate you about it though.Pikablu (talk) 16:31, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
I'm not buying it. Because why else would you vandalize Officer Jenny's Gumshoos page by adding wrong information? Please stop doing this, or an admin might tell you off. Playerking95 (talk) 17:34, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
I'm not vandalizing. I'm adding the moves it used. You need to stop removing everything just because it's not your presious way doesn't make it wrong. No one else has a problem but you so please stop lowering the quality of this site.--Pikablu (talk) 17:48, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
A couple of things, you are vandalizing it because Officer Jenny's Gumshoos is not the Totem one and only the Totem one used Frustration and Rock Tomb. And doing the right thing =/= lowering the quality of this site. Also, people would agree with me, but they're probably to busy off doing something else to notice. Someone probably made a mistake by confusing the two Gumshoos and then others just went with that. So please undo your most recent edit to the page before someone else does. Playerking95 (talk) 17:58, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Okay, you're really not fooling anyone at this point. I've already contacted an admin about this, so you're going to have to stop doing this. Playerking95 (talk) 12:38, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
What are you talking about?--Pikablu (talk) 12:46, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Are you talking about my Rock Throw edit? That's where it is supposed to link to I'm not trying to attack you.--Pikablu (talk) 12:48, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Please, stop this, it's obvious as hell. I've seen you undo my edits after I've already corrected things, multiple times. If it was once, it wouldn't matter, two, maybe a coincidence, but more then four-five times, that's a pattern. And no, that's not where it should link to. The Rockruff in the manga is Professor Kukui's the one in the anime is Ash's. Just because Professor Kukui once befriended the one in the anime, it doesn't mean that any link should link to Ash's. They are not the same Pokemon and they do not have the same trainer and never did have any other trainer, as far as we're aware. Playerking95 (talk) 16:45, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
But that is where it links to. Have you seen the page? It links to that Rockruff. It's similar to Nolands Articuno or Sabrina's Haunter. It's considered "theirs" on some level even if they don't technically "own" it.--Pikablu (talk) 14:54, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Code of conduct

Personal attacks like "You just want to feel important by stopping it" are never called for. Please make sure you are familiar with our code of conduct.

Thank you. Tiddlywinks (talk) 15:05, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Sorry. It got a little heated. I'll do better.--Pikablu (talk) 15:24, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Chapter pages.

Please, do not make articles for the individual Pokemon Adventures until a volume comes out. Pokemon Adventures' release schedule is incredibly complicated. As such, it has been decided that articles should be made only when an official source collects them in a volume. Ataro (talk) 22:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Oh okay. But the B2W2 chap does it when they come out.--Pikablu (talk) 03:40, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Not the same thing. SM is an entirely new story. B2W2 is just continuing from where volume 52 ended. Also, the official website explictely refers to the new B2W2 chapters as chapter 532 and up. Ataro (talk) 14:42, 28 February 2017 (UTC)


Because you chose to repeatedly ignore my warning about not adding manga moves unless they are explicitly called out, you have been blocked. I have requested multiple times that a move should only be added unless someone outright states the name of the move, but you continue to add them to pages or change articles to claim they were used earlier than they were. Do not do this again, or you will be blocked for longer periods of time. Ataro (talk) 05:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Anime moves

Hi! I just wanted to make sure our policy on adding moves for the anime is clear. It is our current policy that, as a rule, moves should not be assumed unless they were called or else explicitly identified after the fact. The only possible exceptions are, tentatively, the moves on this list.

So even if you think a move looks the same as another example of Bite that can be reliabily identified, it's not okay to assume it is the same move. And while I know Hyper Beam is currently on the list I mentioned above, I think for the time being it would be best to discuss this case.

I hope you can keep this in mind in the future. Thanks! Tiddlywinks (talk) 16:49, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Re: all this... Please remember the above. As far as I'm concerned, the next time you forget this, you will be courting a block. Tiddlywinks (talk) 14:49, 6 July 2017 (UTC)


I'm sorry if you're frustrated and it feels like I'm "undoing all your edits", but I'm merely patrolling my watchlist. If things upset you, please take them to the talk page instead of escalating it to an edit war. Thanks. Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 18:42, 18 June 2017 (UTC)


Hello. Due to your consistent edit warring and rudeness towards other users, you have been blocked for a month. You are fully aware of how things are done on Bulbapedia, do not try to call foul. We do not assume moves are what they are based on animation, that is called speculation and you could be 100% wrong. We need a move to be explicitly said (or "spoonfed" by your definition) so that way, we cannot be incorrect. Yes, I have a page in my userspace detailing move we can assume based on animation. But if you actually care to notice, those are moves with consistent and unique animations. Hydro PUmp does not have a consistent and unique animation, regardless of Hydro Pump "looking" bigger than Water Gun. The animators can make Water Gun look bigger and powerful because plot convenience, they can do whatever the hell they want. Next time, once you've come back, do not - I repeat - DO NOT run for that revert button and DISCUSS any issues you have on the talk page of the user or the conflicting articles. Failure to adhere to this warning will lead to a far more severe punishment. Thank you.--ForceFire 15:20, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Blocked, once again

As I've stated before in the past, do not add a move unless it was explicitly called out. Because of your refusal to listen to repeated warnings, you have been blocked yet again. Please do not do this again or else the next one may very well be permanent. Ataro (talk) 19:42, 2 March 2018 (UTC)


Please don't vandalise pages by deleting important information like you just did on SM127's page again ( Things are put there for a reason. If you haven't seen the episode, that is not an excuse. Playerking95 (talk) 18:11, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

That’s not vandalizing. It can’t master it if it just learned it.--Pikablu (talk) 18:13, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
It is when it didn't just learn it. As I said, not seeing is the episode is no excuse. Lana says she hopes to mater her move and then Sophocles mentions that he also hopes to master his Vikavolt's Zap Cannon and then Lana complimented the move, which means that he was trying to master it. Playerking95 (talk) 18:23, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Um, every move is learned with the intent of mastering. Seeing it used without any problems and saying they hoped it worked doesn’t mean it needs mentioned that it was mastered. - unsigned comment from Pikablu (talkcontribs)

Talk page policy

Hey! Please don't forget to sign your talk page messages with four tildes (~). Thank you. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 20:18, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Mohn's Zoroark‎

I see you have created a page for Gladion’s Zoroark, as Playerking95 has created a page for Mohn's Zoroark‎ which is the same Zoroark‎, I feel your page is redundant.--BigDocFan (talk) 18:44, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

But mine is more accurate and has more information to it. It’s Gladions Pokemon.--Pikablu (talk) 19:22, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
True but because they're the same Pokémon, only one page will be used.--BigDocFan (talk) 20:44, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
That makes sense.--Pikablu (talk) 16:25, 25 June 2019 (UTC)


We know Ash is battling Hau, but we don't what the episode is about. All we know is that they'll be battling at some point. Things don't get unhidden until we know for sure. And your recent edit unhid Hala on the page, not Hau. Playerking95 (talk) 19:20, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Opps, misread it. But we still know Hau is showing up--Pikablu (talk) 19:23, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
I agree, we know that, but without a summary, a picture, footage or there names in the title, it's still speculation. This site is about facts, which is why things stay hidden until there is confirmation, as likely as we know that the hidden things will happen. Sometimes curveballs gets thrown. Even titles have kind of lied in the past. Playerking95 (talk) 19:32, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Sure, but how could this possibly be anything else. We have two episode summaries to prove it.--Pikablu (talk) 19:52, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Bird Pokemon that could be owned by other characters. What are the two episode summaries? Unofficially, most if not all of us know it'll be Ash and Hau, but since there is still a low possibility that it could be between other people, it's still speculation. If you speculate, even if the speculation and it's a strong possibility and you end up being wrong, a website can lose credibility. Playerking95 (talk) 16:24, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
At the same time don’t we lose credibility when we refuse to put information that’s 90% likely?--Pikablu (talk) 15:33, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Who cares what they think then, because they should understand that this site is about facts and even a 10% or 1% at being wrong would make us look bad for assuming. Other sites have assumes and it doesn't look good. Some sites even has mistakes still up like listing Pokemon that never appeared in an episode. Playerking95 (talk) 15:36, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

That is bad, but common sense should be used with it. If we’re wrong it can always be changed--Pikablu (talk) 15:39, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

But the history that it was there will still be available. And admins prefer the less editing as possible. I might not 100% like it, but that's what the admins want. When things are likely going to happen, they remain hidden until it's proven or an episode airs. Playerking95 (talk) 15:46, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
we don’t always follow that. When a rival had a new pokemon in a preview we list it as theirs even though it can’t be proven yet.--Pikablu (talk) 17:04, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Pikachu in a cap article

I understand your reasoning, but there is an ongoing discussion at Talk:Ash's Pikachu about splitting the content and a final vote had not yet been reached. Please contribute to the discussion first and wait for an admin to make the final decision before creating an article on this topic. That's policy. Thank you. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 09:02, 26 July 2019 (UTC)


It doesn't matter when Magearna's Shiny was revealed or released. Lillie's Magearna matches that color exactly. Do not just remove it from pages without starting a discussion first. Second, this is the anime. They've been previewing future content since episode one, so it's not out of the question the writers were aware of Magearna's Shiny color before Home came out. Or its possible that they made Magearna's Shiny look like that because of the anime. Either way, unless we're told otherwise, there's no reason to believe it's not Shiny. Ataro (talk) 05:24, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

If we’re following that logic why is Ash’s Greninja’s Ability not confirmed? And if we’re retconing info to work backwards, why isn’t Dawn’s Togekiss a fairy type or Jessie’s Arbok’s Bite a dark move?--Pikablu (talk) 11:22, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Ash's Greninja's ability is confirmed via the games and the event that allowed players to obtain a copy of Ash's Greninja. Dawn's Togekiss never appeared in a X and Y episode and before that, had never been shown to have a weakness to Poison or Steel type moves. Jesse's Arbok is only known to have used Bite twice and it was prior to the introduction of the Dark type. That being said, it never used Bite on a Psychic type Pokémon so there would never been a way to confirm its move typing had changed to the Dark type. Frozen Fennec 14:35, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Why is Battle Bond not confirmed in the anime? And nothing in the anime confirmed Magearna as a shiny. It’s either we retcon things or we don’t.--Pikablu (talk) 21:03, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
The Magearna was differently colored, and HOME retroactively made it the shiny form. There's your retcon.--ForceFire 05:25, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
That makes sense but if we’re doing that we should be retconing everything. Cherry picking is confusing and leaves the site with wrong information.--Pikablu (talk) 17:05, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Heads up

Don't vandalise pages by reverting edits like the one on SS023's page, when you're NOT meant to add things unless their is at least good enough evidence and clearly there is no evidence. Absolutely none at all that it will appear in SS023. Cheers. Playerking95 (talk) 15:35, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Um, yes there is. It’s in the picture, first of all, so super obvious. The episode is also about a Pokémon stealing food, which, again, is shown in the picture. Everything is saying it’s in the episode except for you. A ton of people have undone your attempt to hide the obvious so maybe you should stop vandalizing and calm down.--Pikablu (talk) 15:50, 18 April 2020 (UTC)


What’s so opinionated about something that’s “done or accomplished in a critical situation”, as is how “clutch” is defined”?--KnightGalarie (talk) 19:57, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

It doesn’t feel right. Clutch seems like lingo and bias over saying what was seen.--Pikablu (talk) 19:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Well it’s been reworded anyway in a manner that does seem better either way--KnightGalarie (talk) 19:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
good. Don’t start a talk about it if you can’t be patient enough for a response. It wasn’t even a day before you undid it again.--Pikablu (talk) 20:20, 29 April 2020 (UTC)


Don't assume Raboot will appear in every single episode, wait until we have confirmation.--BigDocFan (talk) 13:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Why? Again, main character and had appeared every episode since it first showed up. Should we also hide Pikachu since no one gave you a source for that?--Pikablu (talk) 13:36, 8 July 2020 (UTC)


I know that such Pokémon have no pages u_u ... I made the modification just to be able to update the information. The Goh page is a mess and nobody is willing to fix it.- unsigned comment from Hikaru Wazana (talkcontribs)

You made it worse though. They don’t have any info now, it doesn’t add every Pokemon he’s used outside of Kanto, idk where you got Farfetch’d gender and Sobble shouldn’t be there.--Pikablu (talk) 12:13, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Farfetch'd and Sobble already have pages ready to go to mainspace. Farfetch'd, by the way, already has all the requirements that the admins created for Goh's Pokémon. Since nobody moved to do this, I preferred to go there and do it.--Hikaru Wazana (talk) 12:16, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Structural changes to an article still needs consensus/approval. Don't just make the change out of impatience. And don't sign a comment 10 minutes after you've forgotten to sign--ForceFire 12:22, 26 July 2020 (UTC)


Maybe it was eager to battle against Ash pikachu knowing it definitely more powerful then it thought. Since charizard was the one to ask Leon to transform. That made Leon to agreed with it. - unsigned comment from Gian9456 (talkcontribs)

Oh that’s what you meant. Yeah I can see that--Pikablu (talk) 23:50, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

It wasn't a leader. Did it show any leadership like Scyther? No. Did it order any of the pokemon to fight no? Professor only said few pokemon gotten together but Darmination isn't a leader. Just part of the group. That's all. He might had used more attacks but not a sign of a leader.--GIan9456--Gian9456 22:09, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

okay. I didn’t undo it because of that. It was because of the grammar.--Pikablu (talk) 22:19, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Be respectful of others

A user having bad grammar is no reason to snipe at them. This kind of tone is rude and aggressive and is not in any way conducive. Please try to be more mindful of your attitude towards others in the future. Kai * the Arc Toraph 00:22, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

them having bad grammar wasn’t the problem, it’s the constant poor edits that they keep posting. I tried being nice about it but sure, I’ll do better in the future.--Pikablu (talk) 01:30, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

"Meowth isn’t Jessie or James"

[1] I do not understand your undo. ¿¡Unowninator?! (talk) 17:01, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

They said "Jessie or Jamess", as in Meowth doesn't belong to either James or Jessie. They just dropped their apostrophe somewhere. Kai * the Arc Toraph 20:12, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Oh yeah, now that you mention it, Meowth was able to get sucked into a few Pokeballs, thanks. I might clarify the detail. ¿¡Unowninator?! (talk) 21:59, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Final warning.

You have been advised multiple times to avoid adding a move unless it was explicitly called out stated. And yet, you have repeatedly ignored these warnings, even to this day. So I'm putting my foot down. Do not do this again or you will be blocked. Ataro (talk) 19:26, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

It wasn’t called out but it is official. Keldeo NEEDS to know Secret Seord to change forms. What about that are you missing?--Pikablu (talk) 20:56, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Ash's Staraptor

I'm just taking a bit of a proactive stance here to ask that you not edit Ash's Staraptor's page further in relation to its gender. Feel free to discuss it on the talk page. Thanks! Tiddlywinks (talk) 00:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Okay--Pikablu (talk) 19:36, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Goh's Scizor

Goh's Scizor is not Wikstrom's Scizor in the games. In fact, Wikstrom already has a Scizor in the anime, granted it was only in a (probably non canon) movie. So Scizor's game information does not go on Goh's Scizor's page as it is not the game's anime counterpart.--ForceFire 05:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Again why everyone always deletes my comments

I add something great and true from the show Everyone deletes it. Put what they want and it works its unfair. I guess Im no body. I must be disrespect. Not even try to reason with me at all. It not you just everyone seems to out to get me for my comments.--Gian9456 00:00, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Sorry man. Your grammar needs a lot of work--Pikablu (talk) 00:02, 20 March 2021

(UTC) why not just say it. Ash sirfetch'd had shown to protect him from splash of vehicle that came. It represents Ash and Sirfetch'd bond gotten stronger. As Goh stated that they both willing to protect one of another.--Gian9456 00:07, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

I think that’s already mentioned from the chivalrous part.--Pikablu (talk) 00:11, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Shouldn't it be personality It makes more sense of their bond of relationship. They even connected as the challenger had stated they gronw munch more as he questioned himself and his won Pokemon needs to trained once more. if i add it will be deleted will it?--Gian9456 00:17, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

if it’s written the same way then yeah--Pikablu (talk) 00:18, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

well can you write it. They shown strong bond that Goh and the other character was speaking of as it proven to be true.--Gian9456 00:21, 20 March 2021 (UTC) AGAIN it was deleted, I don't understand what is the issue. Why it wasn't wrong. I shown few others they thought was pretty good. I don't understand we post to help each other but people here can be so rude to me. Without telling the reason why it not good enough. Gian9456 23:47, 20 April 2021 (UTC)