Template talk:Bad picture

Suggesting

It'd be handy if it'd include the page into a category which lists all articles with unsatisfactory pictures, don't you think so? UltimateSephiroth ^{(about me · chat · edits)} 21:05, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

That would be actually useful. _*tc26_* 23:34, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Done, Category:Articles needing better pictures. - Kogoro | Talk to me - 02:36, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Suggestion

Why not add in template the reason about the image which is bad in question? So that, it's better for the people to identificate and change! It could be something like this:

Code: {{badpicture|article|Bad Quality}}

The picture used in this article is unsatisfactory. Reason: Bad quality. Please feel free to replace it so it conforms to Bulbapedia conventions.

RikkiKitsune 21:39, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

That's a pretty good idea.--RexRacer 21:40, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you ^^ Just put a space after "Reason:" in the template, ok? I think that will become better xD RikkiKitsune 21:46, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Isn't the only reason bad quality? ^Maverick_Nate 22:38, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Sometimes people will put them just because it's a jpg.--RexRacer22:43, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Jpg=bad quality=the same reason? ^Maverick_Nate 22:51, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

The pic could be not appropriate enough or something else. RikkiKitsune 23:03, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Another suggestion, completely unrelated yet applicable

If we have a "bad picture" template, what about a "missing picture" template? There are quite a number of articles that can have images, but no one's captured them, or have but not posted on the respected article. Luna Tiger * the Arc Toraph 02:06, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

I agree with that. I have seen several articles that should have pictures but don't. A template would be quite useful. --SnorlaxMonster 09:27, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

• I concur. Can we start with Seafoam Islands and its non-existent map? CorporalStone 21:38, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

About those pages with the template...

The important users seem to be less caring about them after putting the template on. Making them almost deserted due to less management.

In fact, what are the important users doing? Some of these users are actually not caring about these pages for 2 generations now. 2 GENERATIONS. How lazy!

--Madi Shinx (talk) 17:21, 18 March 2018 (UTC)