User talk:J-J-M/Archive4

List of archives:

• User talk:J-J-M/Archive1
• User talk:J-J-M/Archive2
• User talk:J-J-M/Archive3

Stop it.

Stop removing that piece of trivia from Lila's page. There's nothing wrong with it. --ケンジのガール 00:26, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Yes, there is. Since genders of COTD's Pokémon is, by far, unneeded. J-J-M 22:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Most of the time, me don't even know the genders of CODs Pokémon. We mention it for Tyler don't we? Your argument is invalid. --ケンジのガール 16:35, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Which is speculation to begin with. All I'm saying is just mention Delcatty is male in the Pokémon section or even in the body of the article. A entire piece of trivia isn't needed. J-J-M 12:42, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

The trivia does make a valid point. It isn't speculation, there is proof.--Clarky13 12:46, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

I don't doubt it. It just isn't notable for a big mention such as that. J-J-M 12:47, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

It is a worthy point to mention. I mean it is trivial.--Clarky13 12:49, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Why don't you add it somewhere else in the article? It's notable.--Sher-e-Bengal- 12:50, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Its there in the Pokemon page. J-J-M 12:51, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

But, prove is need in Delcatty's page.--Clarky13 12:54, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

We don't mention proof for the other confirmed genders. It just isn't worth it. J-J-M 12:56, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

OK, OK. If you want to live in an incomplete 'pedia. I don't even do anime, lol.--Clarky13 13:00, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Look just because we don't do it for other Pokémon doesn't mean we shouldn't do it at all. Delcatty is one of the rare COD Pokémon that have a confirmed gender. We did have Pippy, but you removed it. But what ever. It's protected now. I've asked you many times to stop it yet you kept doing it. That kind of behavior is worthy of a block. But I don't want to do that. If there was something truly wrong with the trivia, someone would have jumped in.

It's not just that Delcatty has a confirmed gender. It's the way it was confirmed. Confirmed through a Cute Charm ability. That's not worth a trivia mention. I see even less notable things that get accepted everyday, like Charizard is Ash's first fire type. So just leave this alone. You're not going to get your way. --ケンジのガール 20:02, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Delcatty's gender been confirmed through dialogue. The Cute Charm thing just proved it. J-J-M 21:22, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Hey J-J-M!

Happy (late) birthday!--Sher-e-Bengal- 11:34, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, as always. And you changed your username... J-J-M 22:31, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Preview Button

Ever head of it??? Three edits on a single page in order to correct grammar in you recent edits is not necessary. Please use the preview button in the future. Thank you. --Theryguy512 22:57, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

This is a one-time thing all right. I know about the preview button and I am not just some new user here to tell me this. J-J-M 23:01, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

I am aware of that, but I would expect an experienced user such as yourself to be wise enough to use the preview button. --Theryguy512 23:26, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

As I said, this is a one-time thing. J-J-M 23:30, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

It's three edits... Don't sweat it, Ry. He doesn't really need a warning for three edits. Nobody, even a new user, really needs a warning for three edits.--RexRacer -talk 23:35, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi

ThnX for liking my pic.--adyniz 14:03, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Come on

Don't take away the bad picture template. So what if there's no other picture available...that's the point. The template basically means that the picture is blurry and should be changed when possible. Now I'm gonna change it back, so don't start an revert edit war.--^☆Tavisource 19:08, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

There...I changed the picture, so the template is not needed...happy?--^☆Tavisource 19:11, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Gabite image

Dude, the other image is totally better. Why did you change it??? --Theryguy512 19:11, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Gabite doesn't look....right in that screenshot. Its not about the quality. J-J-M 19:17, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Can you please be more descriptive on how it "doesn't look....right"??? The two pictures in debate are below:

File:DP114 Gabite.png File:Gabiteanime.png--Theryguy512 19:20, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Now that I seen it enlarged, it isn't too bad but at least the 2nd pic focuses on it more. J-J-M 19:22, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Okay, well it doesn't really matter. I was just wondering your reasoning behind the image switch. Thank you. --Theryguy512 19:23, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

I thank you two for working it out without too many edits, but I do have to officially warn you, J-J-M, for the small revert war you two got in over the image (same goes for you Thery, but I believe you were already warned on that). Just don't do it again, okay. After the first revert, go to the talk page, instead of doing so five edits later. -- Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 19:46, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Sorry Jioruji Derako. It won't happen again. --Theryguy512 19:47, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, me too. J-J-M 19:58, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

You

Stop with the edit war TALK about on the talk pages.--☆Coolピカチュウ! 22:12, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Um, I stopped already. J-J-M 22:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

We never typed "TTE" or "Poli" when referring to the Time Skipping Cyndaquil or the Demonic Kermit of Nintendo did we?--KukiTalk 22:15, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Sol gave a pretty good explanation. J-J-M 22:17, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

(Edit Conflict) Good.--☆Coolピカチュウ! 22:15, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

What about my explanations?--KukiTalk 22:18, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Project Games

Hi J-J-M! You are an experienced Bulbapædist and so, I thought I would ask you if you have any reliable source of information about the Spin-off Pokémon games. As you are probably aware, they need the most attention of the Project games members. Your help in expanding these articles would be deeply appreciated. Also, why don't you consider joining the project? More contributors will take it to the path of success faster! Thank you.--Sher-e-Bengal- 13:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

You're asking me to know something about the games?? Especially ones like these... J-J-M 13:08, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Hmm. Noted.--Sher-e-Bengal- 13:11, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Protect image

Dude, the Palkia image is a png (A.K.A. BETTER) , and you are totally contradicting yourself: before, you took the image off because it was a jpg, but now that I changed it, you took it off again and PUT A JPG BACK ON!!!. --Theryguy512 20:09, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

I didn't know that was a png. But right now it doesn't matter if it is or isn't. It has horrible quality. J-J-M 20:12, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

No, it doesn't. File:Darkrai Shockwave Palkia Protect.png --Theryguy512 20:14, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Enlarge it. J-J-M 20:16, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Fine: File:Darkrai Shockwave Palkia Protect.png --Theryguy512 20:22, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

What! I meant see the pic enlarged completely and don't post it in my talk page. J-J-M 20:26, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I englared it. And guess what, it looked fine! And it doesn't matter about it being large; it is small on the page. --Theryguy512 20:31, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Um, are u sure u r seeing all right? Cause that's one bad pic right there. J-J-M 20:33, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

But it doesn't matter what it looks like enlarged, it is small while on the page!!! --Theryguy512 20:36, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

So u assume people would not want to look at the full pic and just be satisfied with a thumbnail? J-J-M 20:38, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Um, yes actually. --Theryguy512 20:40, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

*facepalm* J-J-M 20:42, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

So why are you against having it on the page??? It's not enlarged, it's only like 100px. --Theryguy512 20:44, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

I agree the pic's okay when its small but that isn't the definition of a good pic. It should be entirely perfect or at least close to that. That's why people go around slapping bad picture templates to almost every page. J-J-M 20:49, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

A better pic should be found. TTEchidna 21:04, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Is this any better??? --Theryguy512 21:19, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

It still ain't. Right now, we don't need the Palkia pic. We have enough number of other pics. J-J-M 21:22, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Well I just uploaded another version of it... --Theryguy512 21:27, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

I know this article is 3 weeks old, but I just couldn't help myself into getting a better pic, because all 3 of those other pics are pretty atrocious, no offense. File:Darkrai ShockWave.png This isn't the full size pic, btw. Hmdwgf 28 March 2009 39:32 (UTC)

Dude, that pic is PERFECT! Thanks for getting it! --Theryguy512 02:13, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

No problem, anytime. Hmdwgf 19:17 29 March 2009

And also...

One more thing. Why are you reverting my edits on Lila??? I moved the image to allow the text to fit better, but you're just messing it up. --Theryguy512 20:15, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Beautifly

Why can't we state that it's Aaron's Beautifly??? No, Aaron is not a main character, but he's still important!!! His Beautifly is even important enough to have its own page!!! --Theryguy512 22:46, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Its the Pokemon Beautifly's page. And it links anyway to the page. J-J-M 23:06, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Bad Pictures

You know, instead of just slapping the bad picture template on due to a .jpg, you can upload the image as a .png, and therefore solve the problem... --Theryguy512 14:45, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

What's wrong in putting the template? J-J-M 23:56, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

If you have the ability to update the pictures yourself, it could be considered lazy o_0 — THE TROM — 00:03, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Exactly what Trom said. --Theryguy512 01:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Edit

why did you put the WOMAN above. --Prongs (Talk • Contributions) 15:01, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Forgot to change it, simple as that. J-J-M 15:04, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

DP 120

See some empleyon has edited the Paul section for an upcoming episode . I think it is not allowed. Is it ? --Prongs (Talk • Contributions) 15:16, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

If you are an admin delete spook please. Someone is misguided. --Prongs (Talk • Contributions) 15:20, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm not an admin. J-J-M 15:22, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Drake's Dragonite

Would you like me to send you a link to download EP112 so I can prove to you that Drake's Dragonite used both Slam and Body Slam? If so, send me your personal e-mail address. Hmdwgf 10:58 (UTC)

Hi

May i know some strong reason for editing my trivia line? It is totally fine then what's wrong with it. --♫♪Adyniz♪♫ 15:42, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Because its not true. J-J-M 15:46, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

So it is not true? I think you didn't watch the episode today. Is that so? Then go and watch it immidiately. --♫♪Adyniz♪♫ 15:52, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Trivia

May I ask how so? Piplup clearly held the Everstone in the episode--BLA321 16:07, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Was it seen carrying it around? No, right? J-J-M 16:16, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Preview Button

Before, I was checking my watch list and saw that you edited Electabuzz, so I followed the link to go see what changes you made on the page. However, when I returned to my watchlts, you had changed the page yet again; this went on once more. Can you PLEASE use the 'Show preview' button when making edits??? I can't stress this enough. There is no reason why a user should make 3 edits in less than a minute. Thank you. --Theryguy512 22:07, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

So, what's wrong if a few extra edits are made on one page? Nothing that big a deal to post on someone's page for it. J-J-M 09:36, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

A few could build up to a lot, which takes a toll on the server. Θρtιmαtum_Talk 10:11, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, but it's just 3 edits. J-J-M 10:13, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

That's why I said that it could build up, if you had done 3 edits each for 100 pages, that would be 200 revisions wasted. Θρtιmαtum_Talk 10:15, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Which didn't happen. So it isn't a big deal. Let's say I had made 7-8 edits on one page and went to another page and did the same thing. Then, it would be a big deal. I just made 3 edits and stopped right there. J-J-M 10:25, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

I do hope the entire community is reading this conversation... Lessons for all, methinks. — THE TROM — 10:21, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Isamu Akai's Clefairy

Why the heck do you keep moving it. You have not given a reason, so explain.--☆Coolピカチュウ! 23:51, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

I have given a reason. We don't have "Ash Ketchum's Pikachu", so why is this any different. J-J-M 18:14, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Anime =/= Manga.--☆Coolピカチュウ! 22:43, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Neutral party weighing in: I see no problem with the article at the full name. CP is the leader of Project Manga, and his word goes. JJM, you should know to discuss these things rather than warring over it. — THE TROM — 23:03, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

But the Aesthetics of the site have nothing to do with the content of the manga, so JJM is right. CONFORM!--Ambipography 23:10, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Just so you know

All trivia points get a bullet, even if there's only one. Helps to keep a standard. — THE TROM — 21:03, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

DP127 Battle Document

I noticed that you removed my document of the gym battle for DP127. Not to object, but I also wrote one for DP101. Is there a specific rule to documenting battles, or should they be in a full synopsis? --rockersk08 14:54, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Here is the hidden text in the DP episode template

==Major events== <!-- This is not for summarizing everything that happens in this episode. Only events pertaining to the series as a whole, such as captures and releases, go here. -->

As seen from here, only major events go in that section. The details should be in the synopsis. J-J-M 14:57, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

I seemed to have overlooked that text. Thank you for clearing that up. I'll go clear off the one I put for DP101. As for 127, I guess I'll have to wait until it is dubbed before I can write a synopsis. --rockersk08 15:00, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Phione

How is Pokemon.com's random guessing about Phione's legendary status enough proof? I'll answer for you, it isn't! I will not be convinced until the people in Japan who are behind Phione's creation state whether it is legendary or not. Nothing other than that would be official. Pokemon.com's staff did not create Phione. They wouldn't know. I'm gonna put back the stuff about its legendary status being under debate. Please do not revert it, I don't want an edit war on our hands here. Missingno. Master wants YOU! Join the Order of the Glitch! (my talk page) 10:47, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Stop

You know they won't do that. --Nick., something to say? 15:25, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Lack of clarity in edit summary

I'm here wondering what you meant by your informative edit summary of "no" on this recent diff, removing the anime dex entry from Swampert. TheChrisD ^{Rants•Edits} 23:49, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Please see the AnimeDex project here and here. TheChrisD ^{Rants•Edits} 16:14, 8 June 2009 (UTC)