Talk:MissingNo./Featured article candidate/Nomination 1

Support (5)

• This has got to be the most comprehensive, complete, and informative Glitch Pokémon Bulbapedia has to offer. Surely a precendent to be set for all the stub-esque Glitch Pokémon articles with little more than an infobox, vague information, and MAYBE a learneset. I'm Missingno. Master, and I approve this message. 15:45, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
• I agree with Missingno. Master. That, and i love Missingno., awesome Glitch. ~~Takoto タコト| サソデイ = 愛 15:58, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
• Very detailed, very self-explanatory. I nominate. Θρtιmαtum♏_Talk|Links02:49 6 Sep 2008
• I AGREE cal05000 07:53, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
• I Agree Theininen 20:35, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Object (4)

• Glitchs are really are things Nintendo doesn't approve of. I personally think the article is good, but not enough for a FA. Aura-Knight

Ah, but Nintendo doesn't run Bulbapedia, does it? I'm Missingno. Master, and I approve this message. 02:06, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

• Biology and Physiology sections indicate this is a living thing in-universe. Those bits should be renamed to reflect Missingno.'s nature. Other than that, it's actually a pretty good article. --Martonimos_{((Argh|Blargh))} 08:43, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
• I am quite sure that we should not have a fake Pokémon's article on our mainpage.--Diby 08:47, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
• Sorry I agree with Diby. Pokemonboy 08:49, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

No, no, no, no, no. Pikablu is a fake Pokémon. Mewthree is a fake Pokémon. But Missingno..... He's real, whether Nintendo likes it or not. I'm Missingno. Master, and I approve this message. 10:28, 14 September 2008 (UTC)