User talk:Team Rocket Grunt/Type

Latest comment: 11 August 2023 by Landfish7 in topic Proposed adjustments
???
Order insensitive sort
Dragon
Dragon Flying
Dragon Dark
Fairy Dragon
Electric Dragon
Dragon
Flying Dragon
Dark Dragon
Dragon FairyVI+
Dragon
Dragon Electric

Proposed adjustments

Generation I

Landfish TRG
Offensive properties of Fighting-type moves
Super effective (×2): Not very effective (×½): No effect (×0):
IceNormalRock BugFlyingPoisonPsychic Ghost
Defensive properties of Fighting-type Pokémon
No effect (×0): Not very effective (×½): Super effective (×2):
None BugRock FlyingPsychic
Additional effects
  • If the user has the ability Scrappy or the target is under the effect of Foresight or Odor Sleuth, Fighting-type move will deal damage to Ghost-type Pokemon with the effectiveness of ×1.
Offensive properties of Fighting-type moves
Super effective (×2): Not very effective (×½): No effect (×0):
IceNormalRock BugFlyingPoisonPsychic Ghost
Defensive properties of Fighting-type Pokémon
No effect (×0): Not very effective (×½): Super effective (×2):
None BugRock FlyingPsychic
Additional effects
  • If the user has the ability Scrappy or the target is under the effect of Foresight or Odor Sleuth, Fighting-type move will deal damage to Ghost-type Pokemon with the effectiveness of ×1.

I really like this, but I thought I'd propose some adjustments to the type effectiveness tables. Specifically, I made the table a bit thinner, added the word "properties", and replaced the slate grey color of the type icons to the darker shades of the respective types. (I also added the additional effects to the Gen I table just for showcasing purposes) Thoughts? Landfish7 09:30, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Here it is in my sandbox, since it doesn't seem to want to load right on mobile on this page: User:Landfish7/Sandbox. Landfish7 09:59, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
I'm flattered that this old project took your interest! I know that width was the main flaw of my design and I'm up for changes like yours. I don't know if it's my browser or what, but the "Not very effective (×½):" part breaks into two lines that's why I'd prefer this to be a little wider (unless we break all three cells on the grey background with <br>). I also made those colorful type links a little shorter in height (Fighting type isn't the best example, but Steel type has a column of 11 types so it shouldn't be too tall) and a little wider so they all will be equal (there is a few pixel difference here and there). What about now (I put mine adjustments on the right)?--Rocket Grunt 20:08, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
I think your compromises and further adjustments work well! Thanks for the feedback! Landfish7 21:23, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply