User talk:Galladeon

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Revision as of 08:37, 28 November 2010 by Galladeon (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Past discussion

TCG pages

Quit adding breaks to those pages! MaverickNate 12:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Why? It looks ugly with the overlap! --ルレ 19:59, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Then you're best off getting a new monitor, hopefully one that supports resolutions higher than 640×480 at a recommended setting. Most of the pages you claim "looked bad with the overlap" either didn't overlap at all on a monitor not using dinosaur resolutions like 640×480 or didn't overlap enough to obscure anything. I'm running 800×600, a resolution a lot of recent monitors say is the recommended resolution, and the worst overlap I saw on those pages was a minor overlap that almost reached the W in Weakness but didn't actually obscure anything. --Shiningpikablu252 02:46, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
I'm using a MacBook. It's kinda hard to get a new monitor for a laptop. Anyways, I'm using 1280x800.--ルレ 04:07, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Also, another solution (that I wouldn't be able to help with much) is adding the release info and Pokédex data, like on this page. The overlap I'm seeing is the TCGDex notice often severely overlapping with the infobox. On this page, I see the notice overlapping several inches above the bottom of the infobox. --ルレ 04:49, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Uh, we usually only do release info for promos and reprints, and we only do Pokédex data on cards that have Pokédex data. The entire EX series did not have Pokédex data, hence we can't add Pokédex data to any cards from that era of the TCG. Asking that we add an element that doesn't exist on the card just to solve alleged overlapping problems won't get you anywhere. --Shiningpikablu252 04:54, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
If I could get a screenshot on this thing, I'd show you the overlap I'm talking about. On Eevee_(EX_Unseen_Forces_55), my computer has "project that aims" overlapping "English card". --ルレ 05:03, 26 June 2009 (UTC)


It will categorise always, unless you manually type in the code without the category part of the template. —darklordtrom 06:08, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Uhh... under your usertags, it says your favourite dragon type Pokemon is Eevee... Is that a mistake or a joke?Evilpichulady 16:42, 15 April 2010 (UTC) Evilpichulady

  • It's both a joke and a hope that we'll get a dragon-type Eeveelution soon.--ルレ 16:43, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Oh...... I get it now! I'm also hoping for the dragon-type eeveelution. Maybe gen 5? Who knows?Evilpichulady 22:20, 16 April 2010 (UTC) Evilpichulady

Episode Synopses

According to MAGNEDETH here, TTE has changed his mind and the synopses should be in present tense. The template has already been changed to reflect such, so you are adding a tag saying that it should be changed to present tense to pages on which the synopsis is already present tense. Just letting you know. Werdnae 20:43, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Okay. --ルレ 21:38, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Abilities in the anime

We only write down the abilities that were shown in the anime, such as Pikachu's Static and Magmortar's Flame Body. ht14 05:54, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

I already got that message several months ago and I haven't done that since. Why are you telling me now? --ルレ 13:13, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Deth says Relax

I saw this edit and decided that you needed a warning because not only was that user already in trouble (ie: abuse) but they apologized, and yet, you felt the need to butt in and make some pointless comment. However, then I noticed this edit and realized you need to calm down. Not only are both of these comments "mini-modding" but they were both uncalled for, particularly the latter comment. Adding both of these comments into account, AND the multiple warnings in your archive (of people telling you to calm down), I decided you should take a few days off, and re-evaluate your disposition. You are not an admin, do not act like one; and even so, your comments aren't even the sort of things admins should tell users, so you aren't even setting a good example. If your behavior does not improve upon your return, you will be liable to subsequent, and more severe blocks. -- MAGNEDETH 20:38, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Code of Conduct

This edit was unacceptable. It was made over a month ago, but I wanted it pointed out for future reference. You don't need to use language so bad that it has to be asterisked out.

And don't forget to sign your comments. —darklordtrom 07:16, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

I missinterpretted your edit summary

When you said "it suggested that (s)he used seven Pokémon to defeat Gary in the Indigo League" I thought you meant the episode suggested that. Sorry for the inconvenience. --SnorlaxMonster 08:34, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

It's alright. I don't really have much else to do anyways, other than decide which characters of the day live and which die in a story I'm writing for, which is how I caught the error in the first place. --ルレ 08:37, 28 November 2010 (UTC)