User talk:GalarPony

Welcome to Bulbapedia, GalarPony!

By creating your account you are now able to edit pages, join discussions, and expand the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia. Before you jump in, here are some ground rules: Be nice to everyone. It's in the code of conduct. Make good edits. Preview them before you save to make sure they're perfect the first time around. Use wikicode and link templates when adding content to a page. Use proper grammar and spelling, and read the manual of style. You can't create a userpage until you've added to the encyclopedia. It's a privilege. See the userspace policy. Use talk pages to resolve editing disputes. Don't "edit war," or constantly re-edit/undo the same thing on a page. If you have a question about something, be proactive. Take a look at our FAQ. If you're still stuck, ask for help. The staff won't bite. Sign all talk page posts with four tildes (~~~~). This will turn into your name and the time you wrote the comment. For more handy links, see the welcome portal.

Thank you, and have a good time editing here!   GrammarFreak01 (talk) 02:28, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Signature policy

Hey! Whenever you post on a talk page, any talk page, you need to leave behind a signature. Everyone's required to do that here. In order to do so, you can just type four tildes (~), which will automatically code in your signature for you. Thank you. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 02:28, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Code of Conduct

Please abide by the Code of Conduct. Do not go calling other users "retarded", just because we won't do what you want us to do. Calling other users derogative terms will not be tolerated. Thank you.--ForceFire 04:51, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

As you have failed to act civilly in talk page discussions and have continued your inflammatory conduct, you have been blocked for two weeks. Please read the code of conduct and abide by it upon your return. --Abcboy (talk) 16:46, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Edit warring

You're one to talk about edit warring when you're the one constantly reverting the original reversions. Before you revert again, discuss the contested material on the talk page. There's a lot of precedent for the material you're trying to remove in the "Major events" sections. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 00:22, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Edit warring

Due to your edit warring with GrammarFreak01 on the articles EP042 and EP046, you have been blocked for five days, one day per reverted edit as stated in the blocking policy. Please bring such disputes to the talk page or to a staff member rather than continue to undo edits. --Abcboy (talk) 02:05, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Oh sure block me. I wasn’t the one edit warring. It was that grammar asshole.- unsigned comment from GalarPony (talk • contribs)

Yes you were edit warring. You continuously reverted GrammarFreak, rather than taking the matter to the talk page. And watch your tone. Insulting other users will not be tolerated. If you continue to be uncivil and abusive to other users, you will be moved on.--ForceFire 04:15, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Moved on? Is that a threat?! Are you threatening me?! - unsigned comment from GalarPony (talk • contribs)

The Utility Umbrella.

[[1]] Did you actually test this or are you just assuming? ¿¡Unowninator?! (talk) 23:17, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

I used common sense. - unsigned comment from GalarPony (talk • contribs)

So... you're just guessing? In that case, I'm putting it back. ¿¡Unowninator?! (talk) 20:49, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Signature policy

Hey! Whenever you leave a post on any talk page, always be sure to leave behind a signature. You can accomplish this by typing in four tildes (~), which will automatically code in your signature for you. Thank you. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 23:30, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Why should I listen to you? You got me blocked - unsigned comment from GalarPony (talk • contribs)

Because it's site policy, not my own. Also, you got blocked because you were being stubborn and kept undoing my reversions rather than going to the talk page, not the other way around. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 04:29, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

I will reiterate: please sign your posts. It's customary for all users to do this whenever they contribute to any talk page. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 05:06, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring

From what I've seen on your talk page, you've been warned about this at least twice. I'm going to say this one last time: do not revert an edit you made back without a discussion first. An implied death is not a confirmed death, and we prefer to give factual information here. J is a cartoon character, and it's perfectly within reason that she could've survived. And again, watch your attitude, especially towards staff members. For your repeated ignoring of this warning, I've had to block you. Please do not do it again. Ataro (talk) 23:02, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Really? You blocked me for being right? You know that right? You couldn’t have at least edit my talk page just so I can say that?!! - unsigned comment from GalarPony (talk • contribs)

Ataro just explained why you weren't exactly right. Could you please explain why you think J actually died? GrammarFreak01 (talk) 19:45, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Her helicopter crashed into a lake and exploded leaving only her visor behind! Duh. Why do you think she’s still alive after that?! - unsigned comment from GalarPony (talk • contribs)

We need some confirmation from the characters that she died, because obviously J's death can't be shown onscreen as it's a kids' show we're talking about. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 22:24, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

GalarPony, please understand that it's a fictional show and anything can happen. You should also just drop the subject, as unless they actually said that she died (which is unlikely by this point), the article stays as is.--ForceFire 05:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

I’m not dropping it. Unless you can prove she’s alive, she’s definitely dead. - unsigned comment from GalarPony (talk • contribs)

You can't prove that she's dead either, hence why her fate is "currently unclear". GrammarFreak01 (talk) 21:54, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

(resetting indent)And that's yours and everyone else's opinion. The fact of the matter is, the episode (and the rest of the series) did not say that she died and left her fate as ambiguous. As such, her fate will be left as ambiguous on her article. We are not going to add opinions of what fans think happened to her, we're going to add the facts, and the fact is the episode did not say whether she died or lived, and that's the way it's going to be. Also, regarding Unowninator, had you actually checked his talk page and saw the discussion, you can see he resolved the issue with Pallukun, so he was right in reverting them. He was not edit warring.--ForceFire 05:00, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

How the fuck is it ambiguous?! There’s no way she could have possibly survived. Either she drowned or died in the explosion. Am I seriously the only one using my brain here?! Must I put it back myself?! - unsigned comment from GalarPony (talk • contribs)

First off, please watch your language. Second off, there could've been an escape hatch or something of the like that J used off-screen. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 04:59, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Again, that is yours and everyone else's opinion. Her glasses could've easily fell off her head as she escaped the sinking ship and floated to the surface. It's all speculation,and we are not adding speculation to the article, which is what saying she is dead (or alive) is: speculation. If the episode didn't say she died, then we're not going to say she died. We're also not saying that she survived, we are saying that her fate is ambiguous.--ForceFire 05:12, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Signing

Please remember to always sign your comments. You can sign your comments with 4 tildes (~) or clicking the signature stamp () on the top of the edit box. It should also be noted that once your comment has been marked as unsigned, you cannot replace it with your signature as it will give off the wrong time stamp. Thank you for taking your time to read this message, have a good day. --ForceFire 17:05, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Observing an edit war

If you observe what you believe is edit warring, report it to a staff member. Reverting one of the edits in what you believe is an edit war constitutes participating in the edit war.

Of course, in that particular case, it wasn't an edit war, because the two users went to a talk page and resolved the matter after two reverts, followed by Unowninator implementing the result of the discussion. Which Unowninator made clear in his edit summary. --SnorlaxMonster 10:08, 9 January 2020 (UTC)