78,228
edits
(→OBP: reply) |
(→OBP) |
||
Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
When relinking [[PokéPark (theme park)]], it is better to use <nowiki>{{OBP|PokéPark|theme park}}</nowiki> than <nowiki>[[PokéPark (theme park)|PokéPark]]</nowiki>. Anyway, thanks for doing my relinks again. I really don't enjoy doing them, and you seem to, so we make a good team. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 11:14, 29 February 2012 (UTC) | When relinking [[PokéPark (theme park)]], it is better to use <nowiki>{{OBP|PokéPark|theme park}}</nowiki> than <nowiki>[[PokéPark (theme park)|PokéPark]]</nowiki>. Anyway, thanks for doing my relinks again. I really don't enjoy doing them, and you seem to, so we make a good team. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 11:14, 29 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
: That link template always confused me, until now I didn't realise it was circumventing the disambig pages. And that's fine, relinks is what I do, most knowledge I have to contribute is already added, so I'm happy with clean up duty. Just quickly while I have you, what's happening with Elemental types (TCG)? I've put templates and started discussion, no reply though, I'd do it myself but TCG articles are Mav's thing, and I'd rather have his approval before touching it. --[[User:Spriteit|Spriteit]] 11:25, 29 February 2012 (UTC) | : That link template always confused me, until now I didn't realise it was circumventing the disambig pages. And that's fine, relinks is what I do, most knowledge I have to contribute is already added, so I'm happy with clean up duty. Just quickly while I have you, what's happening with Elemental types (TCG)? I've put templates and started discussion, no reply though, I'd do it myself but TCG articles are Mav's thing, and I'd rather have his approval before touching it. --[[User:Spriteit|Spriteit]] 11:25, 29 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
::I intended to campaign for that after finding my TCG rulebook (which I didn't). However, based on other people's rulebooks and the TCGO, they are called just "types" in the TCG too. You might be better off just letting Nate know on his talk page if you want something to happen. Also, currently it is plural, which is discouraged, so I would suggest it gets moved to "Type (TCG)" if moved, but perhaps there is a reason for the plural that I'm missing. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 11:29, 29 February 2012 (UTC) |