16,071
edits
User talk:MisterE13: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 464: | Line 464: | ||
:Poke.geek removed ''one'' of your comments, which was an addition to a poll which was closed a month earlier. It was a legitimate removal. None of your further comments were removed by Poke.geek. Also, it is up to the admins to determine the extent of rule breaking, not the users. Certainly not the users involved (even if one is an admin), as there will always be a bias. I am going to ask that you drop the issue. It is not your place to request blocks on users. Blocks can be given or not given at the discression of a staff member ranked administrator or higher. Not at the discression of any user. The block given to you was justified, that's the only part of the matter that concerns you. <span class="sc">[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</span> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 05:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC) | :Poke.geek removed ''one'' of your comments, which was an addition to a poll which was closed a month earlier. It was a legitimate removal. None of your further comments were removed by Poke.geek. Also, it is up to the admins to determine the extent of rule breaking, not the users. Certainly not the users involved (even if one is an admin), as there will always be a bias. I am going to ask that you drop the issue. It is not your place to request blocks on users. Blocks can be given or not given at the discression of a staff member ranked administrator or higher. Not at the discression of any user. The block given to you was justified, that's the only part of the matter that concerns you. <span class="sc">[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</span> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 05:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
::So you'd continue to allow bullying as long as the victim is subject to additional double standards?--[[User:SandmanDP|SandmanDP]] 06:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC) | ::So you'd continue to allow bullying as long as the victim is subject to additional double standards?--[[User:SandmanDP|SandmanDP]] 06:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
:::As a neutral party to what has happened so far, I see no bullying. Only two highly opinionated users both determined to have their opposing ways. You have had nothing worse done to you than you yourself have done to Satoshi. Someone disagreeing with you is not bullying. Someone defending their actions when you start an argument is not bullying. There are also no double standards. You got blocked for your edit war and subsequent argument with Satoshi. Satoshi recieved the same block. All other parties involved were doing their best to remain civil and perform damage control. There are two sides to every story, and you are only seeing your own. <span class="sc">[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</span> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 07:28, 15 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
