16,071
edits
User talk:MisterE13: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
→Inquiry
m (→Inquiry) |
|||
| Line 462: | Line 462: | ||
:::Firstly, {{u|Poke.geek}} is not a staff member of any kind. Secondly, while not following the best course of action, only one of thier comments could even be considered breaking the code of conduct. A single comment is not sufficient reason to block under normal circumstances. They did not encourage Satoshi to taunt you, they were not hasassing you, simply defending their own actions. Finally, I will repeat, provoking a user '''''is punished and was punished in this case'''''. If you find yourself on the recieving end of provocation, the best response is to log out. Walk away, give yourself time to calm down. Reacting with an inflamatory comment on your own is behaviour that is highly likely to lead to a block. <span class="sc">[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</span> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 05:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC) | :::Firstly, {{u|Poke.geek}} is not a staff member of any kind. Secondly, while not following the best course of action, only one of thier comments could even be considered breaking the code of conduct. A single comment is not sufficient reason to block under normal circumstances. They did not encourage Satoshi to taunt you, they were not hasassing you, simply defending their own actions. Finally, I will repeat, provoking a user '''''is punished and was punished in this case'''''. If you find yourself on the recieving end of provocation, the best response is to log out. Walk away, give yourself time to calm down. Reacting with an inflamatory comment on your own is behaviour that is highly likely to lead to a block. <span class="sc">[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</span> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 05:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
Except I was told only two of my comments were hostile, and the second one was completely appropriate. Pokegeek continued to remove my comments after claiming that I removed talkpage comments, telling me it was wrong. That's hypocrisy and rule breaking, thus I had every right to say Pokegeek was being a hypocrite--[[User:SandmanDP|SandmanDP]] 05:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC) | Except I was told only two of my comments were hostile, and the second one was completely appropriate. Pokegeek continued to remove my comments after claiming that I removed talkpage comments, telling me it was wrong. That's hypocrisy and rule breaking, thus I had every right to say Pokegeek was being a hypocrite--[[User:SandmanDP|SandmanDP]] 05:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Poke.geek removed ''one'' of your comments, which was an addition to a poll which was closed a month earlier. It was a legitimate removal. None of your further comments were removed by Poke.geek. Also, it is up to the admins to determine the extent of rule breaking, not the users. Certainly not the users involved (even if one is an admin), as there will always be a bias. I am going to ask that you drop the issue. It is not your place to request blocks on users. Blocks can be given or not given at the discression of a staff member ranked administrator or higher. Not at the discression of any user. The block given to you was justified, that's the only part of the matter that concerns you. <span class="sc">[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</span> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 05:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
