Bulbapedia:Archived nominations for administratorship/Kuki

Support (2)

• He helps upload many needed screen shots of episodes and also fix many mistakes on pages.--☆Tavisource 01:15, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Tavis is right, and I've come in the Top 10 every month for mainspace contribs, also watch out for vandals but unfortunately, I'm only on maybe three hours a day during the week, @ most--KukiTalk 15:17, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Exactly not everyone on here can say that. --Guardian of Earth |SGMS 2010 15:29, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Oppose (4)

Even so, I take great issue with this nomintion due to the trouble Kuki seems to create with the attitude he has without power backing it. It does not bode well for how he would do as a sysop. But it's not under question right now as the six-month requirement is the final say here. --FabuVinny ^{|Talk Page|} 18:30, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Disagree anyway, Kuki is quick to put the delete tag on pages without thinking about talking it through on the talk page or about the cascade effect that could happen with deleting pages and images. I think it would just cause delete-restore edit wars that were unecessary. And, uploading tons of images is no a good reason for adminship, especialy when he is currently on a Userspace ban for editing other people's pages without permission. ^Moldy_Orange 18:42, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

I oppose this since Kuki is bullying me. Baby G 21:03, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

• Disagree. (Psst, I'm waiting for the 'rejection' to pass.) Kuki spends most of his time on talk pages (Hmm, come to think of it, I do too...). Θρtιmαtum♏_Talk|Links08:21 20 Aug 2008

Disagree. He's used poor spelling and grammar on my talk page (using instant messaging speak is NOT O.K., even if it's a talk page), he's rude and inconsiderate, and like FabuVinny said I feel he might abuse his powers. I hate to be so negative, but this is all I've seen contributed from this user (in my short stay on the board so far). ←{Berrymaster|Talk|Contrib}→ 20:08, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Other comments

• Nomination rejected because nominee has not satisfied the six-month requirement. May be nominated again on October 2, 2008.
• Said Userspace ban ended on 8/15/08
• Regarding Optimatum's opposition-- Then why have I come in the top 10 every month for contributions?--KukiTalk 12:33, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

  Because edit wars and things that are reverted get counted towards your total as well, sadly. ^Moldy_Orange 19:31, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

  I've only gotten into 3, and most of the piles come more from fixing my own mistakes!--KukiTalk 19:36, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

That doesn't make you look better... --electAbuzzzz ^(TALK) 19:39, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

It's called learning! And I thought u liked me!--KukiTalk 19:40, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Hey, this means I'm out fo the running too!Good Day;DCM

We're perfectly capable of liking someone as a person without wanting them as an admin. And I agree; your edit totals are artificially high. --Martonimos_{((Argh|Blargh))} 19:46, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

As I said before: this isn't a popularity contest. I don't think you're right for this. Good users should be nominated. Not friends. --electAbuzzzz ^(TALK) 19:50, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Well until I get Internet at my father's house, unless I go to the public library every day why am I fighting? I'm only on patrol consistently on weekends! I wouldn't be able to be an administrator with that patrol time. BUT I AM A GOOD USER! Screenshots, party tables (manganime), I'ver done so much good!--KukiTalk 19:53, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

All the more we should not nominate you, since you've never done so much good to anyone else. Θρtιmαtum♏_Talk|Links02:25 7 Sep 2008