Talk:Mission Card
How about this image for the Card Difficulty?
It may need to be shrunk though. Sadly, I can't upload it because I'm still not autoconfirmed on the archives, and I'm not sure what to edit there if I can't actually upload anything. >_< Also, I noticed that the cards with the same difficulty have the same color icon, so we could make it blue for cards 1 & 4, green for cards 2 & 5, and purple for 3 & 6. What do you think guys? Unowninator (talk) 19:54, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
- Copied from Pokémon Shuffle's main Discussion page so that it stays attached to the new Mission Card page. It also seemed relevant to the new Mission Card redesign discussion below. --Marlofkark (talk) 17:32, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Mission Cards page split
This section is rather large and is likely to continue growing as more mission cards are added. I think there's enough to it that it should be split into its own page. Any thoughts about this? VioletPumpkin (talk) 23:50, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, I thought so, too.
- That said, I also think a design upgrade wouldn't be a bad idea. Now that there are many, they could be looking more like cards, less like a table. (But all of that might very well be an independent topic.) Nescientist (talk) 14:38, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Mission Card split is now complete. I expanded upon the opening paragraphs a little bit but will otherwise leave any comprehensive redesign to other more adventurous souls. As more Mission Cards are added, it might be useful to consider adding card headings to Nescientist's individual "card" look idea for navigation purposes. The current, one, large table is rather dense. However, given the overall size in the new context of its own page, navigation is not current a problem. If the future, scrolling around just to find Mission Card 31 of 40-something Mission Cards might be a bit tendious. --Marlofkark (talk) 17:10, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Copied from Pokémon Shuffle's main Discussion page so that it stays attached to the new Mission Card page. This is where future Mission Card discussion show now occur. --Marlofkark (talk) 17:32, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Okay, good to know that we apparently all agree the cards should ideally be card-like. I'm not in adventure mode right now, but I'd imagined each individual Mission Card might end up in one header template call, several entry template calls, and possibly a footer template call. The header templates could and should then include the card number. Nescientist (talk) 20:07, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Copied from Pokémon Shuffle's main Discussion page so that it stays attached to the new Mission Card page. This is where future Mission Card discussion show now occur. --Marlofkark (talk) 17:32, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Mission Card split is now complete. I expanded upon the opening paragraphs a little bit but will otherwise leave any comprehensive redesign to other more adventurous souls. As more Mission Cards are added, it might be useful to consider adding card headings to Nescientist's individual "card" look idea for navigation purposes. The current, one, large table is rather dense. However, given the overall size in the new context of its own page, navigation is not current a problem. If the future, scrolling around just to find Mission Card 31 of 40-something Mission Cards might be a bit tendious. --Marlofkark (talk) 17:10, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Testing Alternate Forms
The "incomplete" notice on the article says that we should check whether alternate forms work for completing missions. So far, I can confirm that Mega Spooky Sableye does not count towards mission card #17. That's likely not enough evidence to rule out alternate forms altogether, but I don't have access to the older mission cards. Can anyone test Mega Winking Audino (card #1) various Pikachu (card #2), Winking Torchic (card #7), and Winking Cottonnee (card #11)? While we certainly don't need to have all of these tested, it would be better than going off of just one example. Boblers (talk) 04:11, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
