Bulbapedia talk:Blocking policy: Difference between revisions
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:Yeah, but some people get banned because of their talk page. [[User:The Dark Fiddler|The Dark Fiddler]] - [[User talk:The Dark Fiddler|You enter a poorly lit room...]] 17:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC) | :Yeah, but some people get banned because of their talk page. [[User:The Dark Fiddler|The Dark Fiddler]] - [[User talk:The Dark Fiddler|You enter a poorly lit room...]] 17:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
::How's that?--[[User:Tmwps|Tmwps]] 06:12, 11 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
==Regarding the point on [[Bulbapedia:Blocking_policy#Uncivil behavior|uncivil behavior]]== | ==Regarding the point on [[Bulbapedia:Blocking_policy#Uncivil behavior|uncivil behavior]]== | ||
Is it okay to use abusive language under the proviso that it is not offensive to anyone?--[[User:Tmwps|Tmwps]] 17:12, 9 April 2009 (UTC) | Is it okay to use abusive language under the proviso that it is not offensive to anyone?--[[User:Tmwps|Tmwps]] 17:12, 9 April 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:12, 11 April 2009
Blocking administrators should be required to have registered e-mail addresses
I think that any administrator who blocks a user, for any reason, should have his/her e-mail address on the Bulbapedia system, to allow the blocked user to e-mail the administrator and ask for more details for the reason of the blocking. User142 | Talk 05:24, 12 January 2006 (CST)
The block log is visible to all, and I think a blocked user will see the reason they are blocked when they try to edit pages. In any case, as per current policy, appeals go to the Editor-in-Chief. - 振霖T 02:54, 13 January 2006 (CST)
It should be fairly easy to appeal the ban on BMGf as well anyway, especially with that allowing for posting by unregged users, unlike 'pedia. --Archaic 06:14, 13 January 2006 (CST)
You should be able to edit your tpage anyway, even if blocked.--Tmwps 17:12, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, but some people get banned because of their talk page. The Dark Fiddler - You enter a poorly lit room... 17:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- How's that?--Tmwps 06:12, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Regarding the point on uncivil behavior
Is it okay to use abusive language under the proviso that it is not offensive to anyone?--Tmwps 17:12, 9 April 2009 (UTC)