User talk:Metalex123: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Metalex123 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Metalex123 (talk | contribs) m (Minor edit) |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
#Please don't make pointless edits like changing the placing of the pipes in a template. It does not affect the template at all. If an edit isn't going to affect how the page looks, then it's a pointless edit. | #Please don't make pointless edits like changing the placing of the pipes in a template. It does not affect the template at all. If an edit isn't going to affect how the page looks, then it's a pointless edit. | ||
#Empty sections should remain on certain pages for consistency between articles. Please leave them be.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#EBC600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#EBC600">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#D8B600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#D8B600">ire</span>]] 07:49, 22 October 2018 (UTC) | #Empty sections should remain on certain pages for consistency between articles. Please leave them be.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#EBC600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#EBC600">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#D8B600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#D8B600">ire</span>]] 07:49, 22 October 2018 (UTC) | ||
:I understand the templates complaint (even though I thought they would look better like that, since every other wikis I've went have those templates like I did), but why keep empty sections for "consistency"? If a section has nothing in it, it doesn't need to be there. If you want "consistency", then in my opinion, I think all pages with empty sections should get those useless sections removed, since it looks weird to have. --[[User:Metalex123|Metalex123]] ([[User talk:Metalex123|talk]]) 17:19, 22 October 2018 (UTC) | :::I understand the templates complaint (even though I thought they would look better like that, since every other wikis I've went have those templates like I did), but why keep empty sections for "consistency"? If a section has nothing in it, it doesn't need to be there. If you want "consistency", then in my opinion, I think all pages with empty sections should get those useless sections removed, since it looks weird to have. --[[User:Metalex123|Metalex123]] ([[User talk:Metalex123|talk]]) 17:19, 22 October 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:20, 22 October 2018
Welcome to Bulbapedia, Metalex123! | |
By creating your account you are now able to edit pages, join discussions, and expand the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia. Before you jump in, here are some ground rules:
| |
Thank you, and have a good time editing here! ☼ BlazingFist ☼ 14:18, 30 March 2014 (UTC) |
Templates and empty sections
- Please don't make pointless edits like changing the placing of the pipes in a template. It does not affect the template at all. If an edit isn't going to affect how the page looks, then it's a pointless edit.
- Empty sections should remain on certain pages for consistency between articles. Please leave them be.--ForceFire 07:49, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
- I understand the templates complaint (even though I thought they would look better like that, since every other wikis I've went have those templates like I did), but why keep empty sections for "consistency"? If a section has nothing in it, it doesn't need to be there. If you want "consistency", then in my opinion, I think all pages with empty sections should get those useless sections removed, since it looks weird to have. --Metalex123 (talk) 17:19, 22 October 2018 (UTC)