Talk:Brock/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
===Support (2)===
===Support (3)===
*I'm really happy to see someone put this up as a FAC, considering how much work I've put into the article.  There's still a little more work to be done - the manga section makes me sad because it still has a picture ganked from Serebii - but otherwise I do think this is one of our best articles.  --[[User:Pie|Pie]] <sup>~[[User talk:Pie|♪]][[Special:Contributions/Pie|♫]]</sup> 18:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
*I'm really happy to see someone put this up as a FAC, considering how much work I've put into the article.  There's still a little more work to be done - the manga section makes me sad because it still has a picture ganked from Serebii - but otherwise I do think this is one of our best articles.  --[[User:Pie|Pie]] <sup>~[[User talk:Pie|♪]][[Special:Contributions/Pie|♫]]</sup> 18:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
*I definitely think it's one the most in-depth articles in Bulbapedia... I blame you totally for it, Pie. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000;">T</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000;">T</span>]][[wp:Echidna|<span style="color:#FF0000;">E</span><span style="color:#0000FF;">chidna</span>]]''' 04:02, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
*I definitely think it's one the most in-depth articles in Bulbapedia... I blame you totally for it, Pie. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000;">T</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000;">T</span>]][[wp:Echidna|<span style="color:#FF0000;">E</span><span style="color:#0000FF;">chidna</span>]]''' 04:02, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:57, 7 September 2007

Support (3)

  • I'm really happy to see someone put this up as a FAC, considering how much work I've put into the article. There's still a little more work to be done - the manga section makes me sad because it still has a picture ganked from Serebii - but otherwise I do think this is one of our best articles. --Pie ~ 18:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
  • I definitely think it's one the most in-depth articles in Bulbapedia... I blame you totally for it, Pie. TTEchidna 04:02, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Very nice, high quality article. Perfect grammar, nice detail. Good job! -Politoed666 01:56, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

Other comments

  • Why is it that when I push the FACs, people think I'm only trying to get this article featured? --Pie ~ 03:54, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
    • ... actually, on second thought, don't answer that. --Pie ~ 03:54, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
  • I'm sure this is really good page, but it looks sooo long. I think it needs to be broken up more or something. I just can't bring myself to wade through all that text. --Greengiant 06:15, 1 July 2007 (UTC)