Talk:Brock/Featured article candidate

Support (19)

• I'm really happy to see someone put this up as a FAC, considering how much work I've put into the article. There's still a little more work to be done - the manga section makes me sad because it still has a picture ganked from Serebii - but otherwise I do think this is one of our best articles. --Pie ^~♪♫ 18:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
• I definitely think it's one the most in-depth articles in Bulbapedia... I blame you totally for it, Pie. TTEchidna 04:02, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

• Very nice, high quality article. Perfect grammar, nice detail. Good job! -Politoed666 01:56, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

• This is an amazing article! --Shiny Noctowl^{Talk|Contribs} 01:27, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

• Nice, Nice, really really nice. Good grammar. Long article. Everything. Good Pictures too. --User:GlalieGuy

• Mmmm.. win. TinaTheKirlia ^♪☆ 16:14, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

• Very, very descriptive article TheEspeonMaster-- 11:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

• Quite good. Optimatum♏^Talk|♊Hi 11:16, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

• Really really good!-Billy4b2004 11:32, 17 January 2008 (UTC)-MathijsP

• IMO, the most information filled page on Bulbapedia! Zander 09:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

• This is one of the best of Bulbapedia articles and it should be a featured one

• This is very detailed and interesting to read, I would definatly like this to become featured - AdamDuffield - 1 April 2008 (UTC)

• I vote for this.....C is for Cookie 01:48, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

• Very detailed, this is a definite FA--KukiTalk 01:50, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

• One of the best articles on Bulbapedia. Misty-May-Dawn rulz 09:44, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

• Great article but way to large, split maybe? Kilik 12:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

• Great page nothing wrong.--CoolPikachu! 00:29, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

• No Complaints.--PikaNinja7

• Now that all of Brock's cards in the TCG have pages, I think he deserves it. ^Moldy_Orange 00:34, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

• This a very good article to read over and over I can say I have read it a lot of times Pokemonboy 19:08, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Other comments

• Why is it that when I push the FACs, people think I'm only trying to get this article featured? --Pie ^~♪♫ 03:54, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
  • ... actually, on second thought, don't answer that. --Pie ^~♪♫ 03:54, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
• I'm sure this is really good page, but it looks sooo long. I think it needs to be broken up more or something. I just can't bring myself to wade through all that text. --Greengiant 06:15, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

• I would vote "support," but I already voted for Pokémon world in relation to the real world. --Shiny Noctowl^{Talk | Fun} 19:26, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Uh, it's not like voting for one out of the ones up here to be accepted as a featured article. It is a judgment of the individual article for the status. All of these could be accepted as Featured Articles without causing conflict. Note how I've voted that I support several. ^^o --Pie ^~♪♫ 04:16, 26 September 2007 (UTC)