User talk:Falk

Welcome to Bulbapedia, Falk!

By creating your account you are now able to edit pages, join discussions, and expand the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia. Before you jump in, here are some ground rules: Be nice to everyone. It's in the code of conduct. Make good edits. Preview them before you save to make sure they're perfect the first time around. Use wikicode and link templates when adding content to a page. Use proper grammar and spelling, and read the manual of style. You can't create a userpage until you've added to the encyclopedia. It's a privilege. See the userspace policy. Use talk pages to resolve editing disputes. Don't "edit war," or constantly re-edit/undo the same thing on a page. If you have a question about something, be proactive. Ask for help. The staff won't bite. Sign all talk page posts with four tildes (~~~~). This will turn into your name and the time you wrote the comment. For more handy links, see the welcome portal.

Thank you, and have a good time editing here!   Diamond Lanturn CodeName: 05308 12:50, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Sub headings

Don't change them without discussing with others on the talk page, these have been the same for years and are pretty much decided Diamond Lanturn CodeName: 05308 12:50, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

O.K, but why we won't creat a part for Ash's Pokémon "can be called upon", the part "released" isn't accurate. All Pokémon are in training that either those of Oak's Laboratory or those are released. Falk 13:04, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Take it up with Kenji-girl, I'm just one of her minions Diamond Lanturn CodeName: 05308 13:04, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

The one that Ash never called back since they went on training are considered as "released" and the ones who were called and gone back are considered as "in training". Kenji might not be available right now, if she's then well and good otherwise I'll bring this issue to her when I encounter her next time. ♫♪AdyNiz♪♫ 13:06, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

O.K, so why we don't put Ash's Primeape in the part "released", and the same thing for Dawn's Ambipom. Can i edit this ? Falk 13:12, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

By the way, Falk, your not allowed to edit your talk page comments after you post them Diamond Lanturn CodeName: 05308 13:30, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

I think you misunderstood me, I was not talking about that released. I was talking about the one mentioned below the "ability" in the respective articles. I think you're talking about the released section in the "trainer's" article. Well, we put release there because they were explicitly a.k.a officially considered as "released" in the anime and can't be called back (most probably; never happened in the anime till now) like Butterfree, Pidgeot etc. However, Gliscor (who was released for a particular reason; in order to train and it did return later), Ambipom was released for the same purpose so we can't apply "Released forever" thingy on it as well, if you know what I mean. I hope you're getting my point. ♫♪AdyNiz♪♫ 13:32, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Well, I'm Not Agree About What You Said Between dawn's ambipom and ash's gliscor , It's Not The Same purpose. Dawn released Ambipom for Letting Her Practising Her favorite sport, it Doesn't Have Any report to evolve Her fighting of capabilities (Therefore it's a training for a sport, ok but we aren't interrested in that, what interest us is what the character did of the pokémon, in that case, Dawn released Ambipom to give her the opportunity to pursue his passion, the same thing can be said for Ash's Primeape about boxing . Falk 14:02, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Her favorite sport? She was interested for sure but I don't think that means "favorite". Btw here, we're talking about whether to count them as "can be called back" or not. So, the answer is no because Dawn left her for training (for what so ever). I'll further discuss it with KG, she might answer this in a better way. ♫♪AdyNiz♪♫ 14:08, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

For training ? Why you're calling that a training, Ambipom is in training, this is for sure in training but she is in training to improve her skills in a sport. We can say this in Ambipom's article, but do not admit it's a training in the general sense of the word. Also, it brings confusion with Ash's Charizard and Squirtle who are in the same part in Ash's article (In training) and who can be called upon at any time (therefore they belong always to Ash. This is not the case of Ash's Primeape. Falk 14:21, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

I think we have better to put Ash's Primeape in th part "Released" and modify the part "In training" in Dawn's article into "Released". What peaple think ? Falk 14:46, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Talk Page comments

Don't remove them, ever Diamond Lanturn CodeName: 05308 19:50, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Ah ok, sorry but as i see that no body answer me, i prefered remove it. So can you answer in what i said? Falk 19:58, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

like I said before, I don't really have any power at all on here, no more than you, but your comment may be awnsered by somone else in the future and it's possible you'll be ignored, however the rules are the rules, I like to help newer users get to no the rules or they end up with a long list of warnings, like I got when I started :P Diamond Lanturn CodeName: 05308 20:03, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Ah ok, Thanks, it's really generous of your part! Falk 19:58, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

So what should i do, i wait or i edit now (about ash's primeape and dawn's ambipom) and i'm waiting for an eventual answer saying that administrators are not agree . 20:35, 15 January 2011 (UTC

Instead of asking questions on your own talk page, where it is likely to be ignored, you should talk to the person who may be of help. In this case, you're looking for Kenji-girl, who is the head of anime. —♥ Jello^talk 20:38, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Ok, thanks all of you for your information and your advice, it's really nice! Falk 21:02, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring

Actually, what I meant to say was don't add it again. It would be in your best interest to not re-add something that has been removed once before. This is how an edit war gets started and it would be much more constructive to bring it up on a talk page if you disagree with its removal rather than editing back and forth. Thanks. ^★Jo the Marten^★ ಠ_ಠ 21:20, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Talk page comments from the Blacky account

Revert

When someone reverts your edits, especially more than once, don't just add them back. Bring it up on the talk page of that article. --HoennMaster 23:22, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Talk page comments from the Jolami account

Editing

While discussing article improvement is a good move, you need not constantly talk about every detail on a user talk page. That is what the article's talk pages are for. Looking at your contributions up to this point, you have made 28 edits to Kenji-girl's talk page. Some of your discussions were edit requests, which you probably could have done yourself or put the request on the article's talk page. You should also take the time to review the Talk page policy, namely indenting new comments, waiting for a response and not changing comments once they are placed. --rockersk08 16:58, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Ok, i'm sorry about that, it will not happen, but it was just to know if we have to put the past simple or the present perfect for the verb "to give" and finally if the sentence is corect. I had a doubt about it. Maybe you can answer me. Jolami 17:12, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Did you not read the above comment? You are not to delete your talk page comments. If you need to correct something, either state the correction in another comment or strike through the comment by putting the target between <strike> and </strike>, like this. Secondly, you left a sentence incomplete as an edit, not to mention you redid an edit that a staff member reverted you earlier for. If you want more input, bring it up on the talk page, but never leave it like that since it reflects bad on the wiki. Personally, nitpicking between verb tenses is not necessary as long as it states the idea and is coherent. --rockersk08 00:20, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Talk page comments from the Zakr account

Multiple accounts

Are not allowed. Your other account Palk has been blocked indefinitely, and you will be getting a 3 day block here for edit warring on that account. Next time use a talk page to discuss disputes. —♥ Jello^talk 20:07, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Talk page comments from the Palk account

Edit redoing

I noticed that you have been redoing tons of edits lately. What is going on? PattyMan 19:46, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

The offical term for what you are doing is Edit Warring and it is a blockable offence on Bulbapedia. Do not keep undoing others edits expeccially an administrator. If you have an issue take it to the talk page. If you keep it up an administrator will be contacted. Thanks --Pokemaster97 19:50, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

See that welcome template on the top? Read it. It clearly says not to edit war. If you have an issue, bring it up on the talk page instead of reverting back and forth. You reverted 3 times on 2 different articles, so you're getting a 3 day block. —♥ Jello^talk 20:03, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppeting

Is absolutely not tolerated here in anyway, shape or form. Your accounts: Jolami, Zakr, Palk, Pting, and Blacky have all been blocked indefinitely. You have been warned multiple times on your many accounts. As as consequence, you will be forced to keep all those comments from those accounts here, for everyone to see. Next time, simply don't do it. When you come from your block, you will be expected to behave and contribute constructively to this site. Otherwise, you may lose your editing privileges forever. —♥ Jello^talk 20:27, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Hey, I remember the Jolami account claim that it was used by Falk's sister or something on Kenji-Girl's talk. I think.The Sandwich Oven 20:34, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

That's all it is; a "claim". With 5 accounts like this getting into trouble, I highly doubt it. —♥ Jello^talk 20:37, 21 January 2011 (UTC)