Talk:Covet (move): Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Dominikololo (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(→Thief/Covet non-"Damaging Moves"?: new section) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Checked in Emerald on 20 Vulpixs (always helds item) and Covet 20/20 times stolen the item.--[[User:Dominikololo|Dominikololo]] ([[User talk:Dominikololo|talk]]) 12:30, 21 August 2015 (UTC) | Checked in Emerald on 20 Vulpixs (always helds item) and Covet 20/20 times stolen the item.--[[User:Dominikololo|Dominikololo]] ([[User talk:Dominikololo|talk]]) 12:30, 21 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
== Thief/Covet non-"Damaging Moves"? == | |||
So apparently, for the purposes of Me First, Covet and Thief are non-damaging moves--presumably this has something to do with how the "steals item" effect is coded? Experimentally proven in B&W, though not necessarily in other gens. Anyone know if any other moves share this quirk? | |||
[[User:Harumei|Harumei]] ([[User talk:Harumei|talk]]) 16:46, 24 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:46, 24 August 2015
It appears that Covet is a variation of Thief. --Alex S. 01:59, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- *applaud* Keep those comments to yourself. Or you could put it on your userpage... ht14 02:10, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- Really? The move description here has no mention that Covet will fail to steal the target's item, which Thief has.
Checked in Emerald on 20 Vulpixs (always helds item) and Covet 20/20 times stolen the item.--Dominikololo (talk) 12:30, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Thief/Covet non-"Damaging Moves"?
So apparently, for the purposes of Me First, Covet and Thief are non-damaging moves--presumably this has something to do with how the "steals item" effect is coded? Experimentally proven in B&W, though not necessarily in other gens. Anyone know if any other moves share this quirk? Harumei (talk) 16:46, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
