Talk:Battle Tower (Galar)

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search

Rose Tower vs Battle Tower

I can see how having the two be one article has benefits, but I think I still believe that I'd prefer it be two separate articles. I can't exactly articulate why, but all the way through I can't help but think it would certainly make properly filling the article(s) much easier. And that, honestly, probably means it would structure and organize things better, so ultimately benefit the reader!? Is there a clear preference for one article, or can/should I go ahead and create Rose Tower separately? Nescientist (talk) 22:31, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

They should be separate. One article dedicated to the Battle facility aspect of it, the other for the Story aspect. TehPerson (talk) 23:08, 4 December 2019 (UTC)


All the other Battle Tower articles have the introduction Generation in the title, not the region they're in. Should this article be moved to maintain that consistency? --FinnishPokéFan92 (talk) 11:31, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

List of Trainers and their Pokemon

I have a list and Trainers made here - User:TehPerson/List of Battle Tower Trainers (Generation VIII) - in case anyone wants to see. Links of Trainer names will lead directly to the page section displaying their full roster. I won't be mainspacing it yet because it uses a bunch of new templates in order to reduce size while giving much more complete information. TehPerson (talk) 18:22, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Is there an originating, publicly viewable source out there for the claims about which ranks each trainer enters and leaves the rotation? Basic data analysis does hint at Thea correctly being the last trainer on the list who gets introduced at rank 1, and McKinzie is the earliest trainer whose existence at MAX rank I can vouch for, but there are a few fishy things about the rest of the data points. Specifically, new trainers supposedly being added to the rotation at rank 6 (which would be final rank of Poke Ball tier instead of pushing their introduction back to 7, a cutoff that would make more sense as that's where Great tier begins), others added at rank 8 (in the middle of Great tier), and a completely disjoint cutoff where *every* trainer who has a chance to appear at MAX rank also has exactly *zero* chance of appearing at any point before that--as all the supposed "6 and 8" introductions are shown as invariably phasing out after rank 10. As precedent from Maison and Tree, all the trainers who are added to the rotation at battles 31 and 41 go on to stick around for the endgame phase, where they're joined by another set whose introduction doesn't occur until battle 51. SadisticMystic (talk) 21:46, 23 January 2020 (UTC)