13,668
edits
Line 385: | Line 385: | ||
I understand the reason why you locked the article to only allow admins to edit, but the last admin to add anything to the article (other than you) was in January and I fear the article could fall under disuse. [[User:Blob55|Blob55]] ([[User talk:Blob55|talk]]) 13:23, 30 August 2017 (UTC) | I understand the reason why you locked the article to only allow admins to edit, but the last admin to add anything to the article (other than you) was in January and I fear the article could fall under disuse. [[User:Blob55|Blob55]] ([[User talk:Blob55|talk]]) 13:23, 30 August 2017 (UTC) | ||
:The protection expires in a week, Blob55. However, I agree that it's unnecessary — G50, you may not have noticed, but Blob55 provided the proof I requested on my talk page, so there is no longer any dispute about the article contents. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 15:45, 30 August 2017 (UTC) |
edits