74,007
edits
User talk:Maverick Nate/Archives/8: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
User talk:Maverick Nate/Archives/8 (view source)
Revision as of 22:24, 12 December 2011
, 12 December 2011→Dragon Selection
| Line 650: | Line 650: | ||
:Because none of the types are confirmed. All we know is that those Pokémon will be appearing AND that the Dragon type is introduced. none of the types of the Pokémon are confirmed. ''[[User:Maverick Nate|<sup style="color:#00008B;">'''Maverick'''</sup>]][[User talk:Maverick Nate|<sub style="color:#00008B;">'''Nate'''</sub>]]'' 22:05, 12 December 2011 (UTC) | :Because none of the types are confirmed. All we know is that those Pokémon will be appearing AND that the Dragon type is introduced. none of the types of the Pokémon are confirmed. ''[[User:Maverick Nate|<sup style="color:#00008B;">'''Maverick'''</sup>]][[User talk:Maverick Nate|<sub style="color:#00008B;">'''Nate'''</sub>]]'' 22:05, 12 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
:lol... The set introduces the Dragon-type to the TCG; all the pokémon currently listed are, at least, Dragon-type in the games; what other type could they be? Do you really think they will include a Psychic-type Latias, for example, in a set that exclusively introduces the new Dragon type? I think it's pretty obvious they will all be of the new Dragon type... [[User:Metalizard|Metalizard]] 22:13, 12 December 2011 (UTC) | :lol... The set introduces the Dragon-type to the TCG; all the pokémon currently listed are, at least, Dragon-type in the games; what other type could they be? Do you really think they will include a Psychic-type Latias, for example, in a set that exclusively introduces the new Dragon type? I think it's pretty obvious they will all be of the new Dragon type... [[User:Metalizard|Metalizard]] 22:13, 12 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
:::They is no confirmation that the Dragon type will be exclusively included in the set. You cannot say with 100% confirmation that any of the known Pokémon in that set will be Dragon type. Sure, it may be obvious some like Rayquaza will, but '''nothing has been confirmed'''. They may still included the dual type Pokémon as the other types. ''[[User:Maverick Nate|<sup style="color:#00008B;">'''Maverick'''</sup>]][[User talk:Maverick Nate|<sub style="color:#00008B;">'''Nate'''</sub>]]'' 22:23, 12 December 2011 (UTC) | :::They is no confirmation that the Dragon type will be exclusively included in the set. You cannot say with 100% confirmation that any of the known Pokémon in that set will be Dragon type. Sure, it may be obvious some like Rayquaza will, but '''nothing has been confirmed'''. They may still have included the dual type Pokémon as the other types. ''[[User:Maverick Nate|<sup style="color:#00008B;">'''Maverick'''</sup>]][[User talk:Maverick Nate|<sub style="color:#00008B;">'''Nate'''</sub>]]'' 22:23, 12 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
