User talk:Redstar: Difference between revisions
CoolPikachu! (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
:Site's rules. >_>--[[User:CoolPikachu!|<span style="color:#007FFF;">'''☆Cool'''</span>]][[User talk:CoolPikachu!|<span style="color:#FFBA00;">'''ピカチ'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/CoolPikachu!|<span style="color:#FFBA00;">'''ュウ!'''</span>]] 03:54, 18 March 2009 (UTC) | :Site's rules. >_>--[[User:CoolPikachu!|<span style="color:#007FFF;">'''☆Cool'''</span>]][[User talk:CoolPikachu!|<span style="color:#FFBA00;">'''ピカチ'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/CoolPikachu!|<span style="color:#FFBA00;">'''ュウ!'''</span>]] 03:54, 18 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
Show me that particular rule that dictates private talk pages. [[User:Redstar|Redstar]] 03:56, 18 March 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:56, 18 March 2009
Welcome
| ||||
Miscellaneous
| ||||
Thank you, and have a good time editing here! — THE TROM — 01:33, 16 March 2009 (UTC) |
Feebas and Magikarp
Replied on my talk page; any further discussion will be posted there. If you choose to post more there, I assume you will check it for my response and will not issue further notification. Thanks. — THE TROM — 02:08, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm still getting used to signing and other necessities to Wiki contribution, so I apologize if I don't always remember/know things.
Secondly, I'll have to keep that in mind for future reference, as far as Pokemon-to-Pokemon comparisons. I did feel it needed to be brought up because there is not a single reference to its similarities to Magikarp in the entire article, save they have the same species type and level-up moves. Redstar 02:14, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Talk Page Comments
Please don't erase talk page comments for no reason. Trust me, you do NOT want to end up like Big Johnno, who got into an edit war with a sysop over comments the former had erased and was trying to keep erased. That user ended up blocked and subsequently had every erased comment restored. --☆Coolピカチュウ! 03:45, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Well it's my talk page, and there wasn't even a discussion taking place. It didn't seem like a big deal to delete something that had no purpose, since it was basically a private message stating to look somewhere else. Redstar 03:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- Unrelated. You leave it there no matter what. Unless it is spam, and that isn't. ht14 03:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Well I'm just going to say that that's bullshit. Redstar 03:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Show me that particular rule that dictates private talk pages. Redstar 03:56, 18 March 2009 (UTC)