Template talk:Unsigned

Uh oh. If we're supposed to put SUBST, why are there so many pages that include it as a template? This is becoming something very similar to The Signature Template dilemmaPM102 16:30, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

We're supposed to use subst for this one? --FabuVinny ^{|Talk Page|} 17:36, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

This is supposedly edited like crazy like other signature templates? Tina^☆♫ 17:37, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

It says that it must be SUBST on the Signature Policy page. And I think the page should be protectedPM102 18:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Just run AWB or perl and subst them.. Not that hard is it? Warwick 18:06, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm too lazy to go through a few hundred talk pages...PM102 18:15, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

You dont have to.. Thats why I just said run a bot.. Warwick 18:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm too lazy to run a bot plus a bot doesn't exist and I don't know how to create onePM102 18:27, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

I can both create a bot, run one and I know where I can get one at very little effort. I'll subst it I suppose. Warning: RC spam probably upcoming. Warwick 18:33, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

RC spam? Wait, but isn't there a "Hide bot edits" option on RC? Tina^☆♫ 18:34, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes there is. talk to Fabu-Vinny, he's an admin currently online right now. And good night. I'm tired, and it's only 1:30 P.M. herePM102 18:35, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

And it's set on hiding all of the botsPM102 18:36, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Bot status needs to be granted, by a bcrat, to hide bot edits. Otherwise its counted as normal edits. Warwick 18:37, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

The only current bureaucrat is TTEchidna. He might be online later. I know cause I have his Aim.PM102 18:41, 22 May 2008 (UTC)