Editing of Bulbapedia is currently restricted. Please see this message for more details.
Pokémon Omega Ruby and Alpha Sapphire are coming this November!

Check BNN and Bulbanews for up-to-date Pokémon news and discuss it on the forums or in our IRC channel.

Template talk:Pokelist

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

Revised redesign

I've made a revised redesign proposal for this template which can be applied to other similar templates. And I've fixed it so it doesn't look a mess in IE. I've provided screenshots as to what it looks like in FF and IE. There should be less white space, more shade variety of blue, and it should look more ordered and aligned, just in a less fashionable manner for IE. Suggestions and ideas are welcome.

OLD screenshot1812009125048yc8.th.png screenshot181200911156pfa8.th.png OLD

    -–<×vVvvv τλικ to ς1tHςι3r ^^vVv×>–- 02:17, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

It looks good. I guess it would look better if you get rid of the white spaces.--☆Kevzo8 02:25, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
You mean the spacing in between the cells, or the spacing inside the border? I reckon keeping just a little spacing in between the cells, at least the lengthwise spacing, would be prudent to avoid everything mushing together. I can reduce the spacing inside the border a touch.     -–<×vVvvv τλικ to ς1tHςι3r ^^vVv×>–- 02:45, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm using Opera so the borders are cornered, But I do know it's rounded in Firefox. Yes, there is too many white spaces in nbetween Regional Dex no. and Browser dex no., And attributes and evolution. Attributes and regional dex ashould be rowspanned. And the current one is fine the way it is.--FF(edits-talk) 04:00, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
(EC) Nope, he means the white under "regional pokedex no" and "by attributes", and I agree. It looks kinda silly. What we have now is fine. — THE TROM — 04:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
I just think the fat widths of those two in the original look rather displeasing with the rounded corners. And all that white on the right looks really empty. I've redesigned it again, this time without those two white spaces. Two different designs in FF, one with more rounded corners, the other more like the IE look, though both look the same in IE and pretty much like the original.

FF 1 (old) screenshot1812009101341pt8.th.png FF 2 (old) screenshot1812009101349wk7.th.png
    -–<×vVvvv τλικ to ς1tHςι3r ^^vVv×>–- 11:33, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
The only problem I'm having now is the top header not fitting the width of the sections below.--FF(edits-talk) 11:35, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Isn't it the same width as the original? I can stretch the height of the header a bit more then. Sorry, thought you meant height. Anything else?     -–<×vVvvv τλικ to ς1tHςι3r ^^vVv×>–- 11:41, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Ok, top header widths have been lengthened. So, which FF design looks better? In my opinion, the second one looks neater. Less curve overhaul too.
FF 1screenshot211200930756pog6.th.png
FF 2screenshot211200930809ply4.png

    -–<×vVvvv τλικ to ς1tHςι3r ^^vVv×>–- 04:17, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

IMO, the first one is better than the second.--FF(edits-talk) 04:19, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Wow, two edit conflicts in a row. I like FF 2 better. — Laoris (Blah) 04:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
I can't decide which one is better as those are both great. :D Anyway, I must say I choose FF 2. ^^--☆Kevzo8 11:56, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
In that case, I'll put the second one up then. ForceFire if anything seems different in Opera, do inform me. Now what other templates could this design be applied to? I can definitely change the colour scheme to fit Fiore and Almia.     -–<×vVvvv τλικ to ς1tHςι3r ^^vVv×>–- 23:27, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Bit of a shadow effect

As you can probably see, I've added a small shadow effect to the table. Works wonderfully with the curved corners for those who, like me, reap the wonderful benefits of using Firefox *wink wink*. If anything looks wrong or ridiculously aesthetically demoralising, inform me straight away.     -–<×vVvvv τλικ to ς1tHςι3r ^^vVv×>–- 11:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

It looks so well in Firefox. Great job Dan! :P --☆Kevzo8 11:56, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks Kevz ^_^ Hmm, I should probably start applying this to a few other templates soon, or else it'll look kind of... out of place lol.     -–<×vVvvv τλικ to ς1tHςι3r ^^vVv×>–- 12:26, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Yup yup. Eh, will the shadow effect be a standard design for all the Nav. templates? --☆Kevzo8 12:49, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
It'd definitely give a stunning result overall. Only thing is I gotta wait for the comments from those who aren't using Firefox, before using the shadow effect anywhere else. Any similar nav templates that I can apply the new design to?     -–<×vVvvv τλικ to ς1tHςι3r ^^vVv×>–- 13:21, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Edit Request

Could someone please add List of Pokémon by experience type?--Cold (talk) 21:51, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Done. Werdnae (talk) 21:56, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Could List of Pokémon by base happiness also be added? —Minimiscience 06:57, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Admin, please do the request above this message and List of Pokémon with released Hidden Abilities --> AKUro? あくロちゃん 23:36, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Done. Werdnae (talk) 04:54, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
List of Pokémon with unique type combinations should also be added to this. MatchMaster 21:20, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Done. --Pokemaster97 21:34, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Can I request that List of Pokémon by Ransei Gallery order be added? - Chosen of Mana 21:53, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Added to the "miscellaneous" section where the Pal Pad from PokePark is. If people think it's more suitable elsewhere then I'm open to suggestions. Werdnae (talk) 22:37, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Can an admin add Strategy Memo? --Abcboy (talk) 00:04, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Can admins add List of Pokémon with unique base stat totals to the list please? Cinday123 (talk) 22:50, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

What are you waiting for? Can I request the one above (Pokémon with unique base stat totals) to be added, please? Cinday123 (talk) 23:45, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Sorry for the extended wait, it's been added now. --Pokemaster97 23:55, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

The "Gen II" link for wild held items links to the main (Gen III+) list. It should link to List of Pokémon by wild held item (Generation II). Tiddlywinks (talk) 16:48, 18 April 2014 (UTC)