Flying (type): Revision history

7 August 2018

• curprev 16:1416:14, 7 August 2018‎ Sumwun talk contribs‎ 27,732 bytes +309‎ →‎Interacting with the Flying type

16 June 2018

• curprev 21:3121:31, 16 June 2018‎ BulbaBot talk contribs‎ m 27,423 bytes −7‎ Bot: Modifying it:Volante (tipo) to it:Volante

15 May 2018

• curprev 21:0321:03, 15 May 2018‎ Dinosauramiable talk contribs‎ 27,430 bytes +116‎ →‎Trivia

9 May 2018

• curprev 18:5718:57, 9 May 2018‎ BulbaBot talk contribs‎ m 27,314 bytes +3‎ Bot: Adding es:Tipo volador

8 May 2018

• curprev 20:3820:38, 8 May 2018‎ Dinosauramiable talk contribs‎ 27,311 bytes −53‎ →‎Trivia: Not listed on any other type page.
• curprev 18:3418:34, 8 May 2018‎ Tiddlywinks talk contribs‎ m 27,364 bytes −25‎ Undo revision 2776062 by Randomwaffle23 (talk)Not unique = not notable
• curprev 18:2018:20, 8 May 2018‎ Randomwaffle23 talk contribs‎ 27,389 bytes +25‎ →‎Trivia: Notably, Flying has been combined with each of the other 17 types.

1 May 2018

• curprev 14:2614:26, 1 May 2018‎ GizemliPanter talk contribs‎ 27,364 bytes +11‎ →‎In other languages: Added Turkish Language

2 April 2018

• curprev 17:0017:00, 2 April 2018‎ Tiddlywinks talk contribs‎ m 27,353 bytes +1,534‎ Reverted edits by Sumwun (talk) to last revision by Akurochan
• curprev 04:2004:20, 2 April 2018‎ Sumwun talk contribs‎ 25,819 bytes −1,534‎ is information about "the metagame" really appropriate for a wiki?
• curprev 03:0003:00, 2 April 2018‎ Akurochan talk contribs‎ 27,353 bytes +495‎ →‎Characteristics

5 January 2018

• curprev 01:2801:28, 5 January 2018‎ Pokeant talk contribs‎ m 26,858 bytes 0‎ →‎Pokémon

2 October 2017

• curprev 18:4218:42, 2 October 2017‎ Tiddlywinks talk contribs‎ 26,858 bytes −121‎ →‎Trivia: Rewriting these so that earlier generations won't have room for mention anyway. It *is* basically the time it took for these things to happen that's really notable
• curprev 18:2518:25, 2 October 2017‎ Tiddlywinks talk contribs‎ m 26,979 bytes −134‎ →‎Trivia: I have concerns about the other one above, but I'm going to pass it over for the time being... But it sounds like this is talking about types with no dual-typed Pkmn, which isn't relevant
• curprev 18:2018:20, 2 October 2017‎ APokemonTrainer talk contribs‎ 27,113 bytes +300‎ →‎Trivia

30 September 2017

• curprev 11:2611:26, 30 September 2017‎ Nescientist talk contribs‎ 26,813 bytes −25‎ No edit summary

21 September 2017

• curprev 23:2623:26, 21 September 2017‎ Cold talk contribs‎ m 26,838 bytes −19‎ →‎Interacting with the Flying type

3 July 2017

• curprev 06:3006:30, 3 July 2017‎ Force Fire talk contribs‎ 26,857 bytes −19‎ Undo revision 2662833 by KyleRGiggs (talk)It was fine before
• curprev 06:1906:19, 3 July 2017‎ KyleRGiggs talk contribs‎ 26,876 bytes +19‎ →‎Trivia: Only one is Pure. It is very unlikely that a new pure Flying type Pokémon will introduce, so making the word by exceptional.

26 June 2017

• curprev 18:4918:49, 26 June 2017‎ Pumpkinking0192 talk contribs‎ 26,857 bytes −54‎ Undo revision 2660584 by RedPanda25 (talk) Bad linking, unnecessary.
• curprev 18:3818:38, 26 June 2017‎ RedPanda25 talk contribs‎ 26,911 bytes +54‎ →‎Pokémon

16 May 2017

• curprev 20:3020:30, 16 May 2017‎ Blueapple128 talk contribs‎ m 26,857 bytes −14‎ →‎Defense

24 March 2017

• curprev 20:4720:47, 24 March 2017‎ BoygeyMario talk contribs‎ m 26,871 bytes +5‎ →‎Trivia

22 February 2017

• curprev 03:0603:06, 22 February 2017‎ Pumpkinking0192 talk contribs‎ 26,866 bytes −9‎ Well, then, you read it wrong. It's not the wording's fault, its yours. If you're going to make such a big deal about it, I guess this is the maximum clarity we can achieve.
• curprev 01:2001:20, 22 February 2017‎ Felthry talk contribs‎ 26,875 bytes +17‎ The wording should be changed regardless, because what I initially got from that sentence was that it would have an effect similar to an inverse battle; that is, making rock be not very effective to flying.

21 February 2017

• curprev 17:0717:07, 21 February 2017‎ Pumpkinking0192 talk contribs‎ 26,858 bytes +7‎ Undo revision 2602921 by Felthry (talk) Not quite. Dual Flying-types whose secondary type has a weakness or resistance to Ice, Rock or Electric take half the usual damage, not neutral damage.
• curprev 14:2914:29, 21 February 2017‎ Felthry talk contribs‎ 26,851 bytes +3‎ →‎Defense: clarified confusing wording
• curprev 06:1906:19, 21 February 2017‎ Nightvalzin talk contribs‎ 26,848 bytes +2‎ I changed the names listed as "Tornadus" to their correct names "Thundurus" and "Landurus".

20 February 2017

• curprev 16:3716:37, 20 February 2017‎ Pumpkinking0192 talk contribs‎ 26,846 bytes −137‎ Undo revision 2602667 by AVulpix4 (talk) Not really relevant to the point, which is about the frequency of a type combination appearing, not the attributes of that combination.
• curprev 16:3216:32, 20 February 2017‎ AVulpix4 talk contribs‎ 26,983 bytes +137‎ →‎Trivia

23 January 2017

• curprev 04:0104:01, 23 January 2017‎ Mr. Yanma talk contribs‎ 26,846 bytes −17‎ →‎In other languages

10 January 2017

• curprev 06:5906:59, 10 January 2017‎ SnorlaxMonster talk contribs‎ 26,863 bytes +20‎ →‎Trivia: "Pokémon type" is supposed to exclude ???
• curprev 06:5306:53, 10 January 2017‎ SnorlaxMonster talk contribs‎ 26,843 bytes +73‎ →‎Trivia: I have no strong feelings about whether or not this trivia should be included, but cleaning it up anyway
• curprev 06:1706:17, 10 January 2017‎ Force Fire talk contribs‎ 26,770 bytes −14‎ →‎Trivia: You've just made it unnotable. "Can be seen above" requires the thing to actually BE above. The table does not indicate the generation, so this is fine.
• curprev 05:5005:50, 10 January 2017‎ Pumpkinking0192 talk contribs‎ 26,784 bytes −135‎ →‎Trivia: Ugh, these still really don't belong here, but at the VERY LEAST they needed to be rephrased to be less blatantly outdated. "Until several generations ago, this was true" is the same as saying "this is false and has been for a long time."
• curprev 03:5803:58, 10 January 2017‎ Force Fire talk contribs‎ 26,919 bytes +351‎ I think these are fine. The first two, you can't really look at the table and see what generations those Pokes are from, unless you expect everyone to know. The last one I see in the same vein as "type has been paired with every other type"-like trivia.

9 January 2017

• curprev 19:3119:31, 9 January 2017‎ Pumpkinking0192 talk contribs‎ 26,568 bytes −351‎ →‎Trivia: Oh, and I neglected to notice: two out-of-date trivia that can be easily seen in the tables above, and one unnecessary one that can easily be seen in the tables above.
• curprev 19:3019:30, 9 January 2017‎ Pumpkinking0192 talk contribs‎ 26,919 bytes −166‎ →‎Trivia: Exceptions aren't notable, and even if they were, this is way too many exceptions.
• curprev 19:2019:20, 9 January 2017‎ Skyarrow talk contribs‎ 27,085 bytes +50‎ →‎Trivia: Updated Trivia
• curprev 19:1719:17, 9 January 2017‎ Skyarrow talk contribs‎ 27,035 bytes −82‎ →‎Trivia: Removed outdated trivia

2 January 2017

• curprev 08:4508:45, 2 January 2017‎ Akurochan talk contribs‎ 27,117 bytes −34‎ →‎Characteristics

23 December 2016

• curprev 02:2702:27, 23 December 2016‎ Akurochan talk contribs‎ 27,151 bytes +43‎ →‎Characteristics

21 December 2016

• curprev 18:3218:32, 21 December 2016‎ Facecheckislife talk contribs‎ 27,108 bytes 0‎ No edit summary
• curprev 18:1318:13, 21 December 2016‎ Facecheckislife talk contribs‎ 27,108 bytes +87‎ No edit summary

20 December 2016

• curprev 08:0408:04, 20 December 2016‎ Pokeant talk contribs‎ 27,021 bytes −31‎ →‎Pokémon
• curprev 07:5807:58, 20 December 2016‎ Pokeant talk contribs‎ 27,052 bytes +3‎ →‎Pokémon
• curprev 06:4506:45, 20 December 2016‎ Danielm345 talk contribs‎ 27,049 bytes −1‎ →‎Pokémon

19 December 2016

• curprev 03:1803:18, 19 December 2016‎ Sir Jolteon talk contribs‎ 27,050 bytes −1‎ Undo revision 2563785 by MaahirMomtaz12 (talk)

18 December 2016

• curprev 23:1223:12, 18 December 2016‎ MaahirMomtaz12 talk contribs‎ 27,051 bytes +1‎ →‎Pokémon
• curprev 03:5103:51, 18 December 2016‎ Tangrowth221 talk contribs‎ 27,050 bytes +108‎ No edit summary