Template talk:User Top Contributor

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

Remind me to put this on my, Fabu-Vinny's, Theryguy512's, Shiningpikablu252's, PAK Man's, Pie's, Woopert's, Siegfried's, and Zhen's pages if they have other non-important usertags once the ban's over. I mean, I could now but that'd be just mean. TTEchidna 06:53, 11 May 2008 (UTC)


I was flipping through the top contributors of the month page and saw my name listed a couple times back in 2007/8. Never really noticed this until now, but I was wondering if it'd be fine to add this tag to my page, even though I only ever do small edits now... and hell that was a long time ago when I actually did make it on the list. →Tinā 19:57, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

if youve made the list once, you can use it. though, i thought it meant hitting #1, which it doesnt, which is why i created that other one. -- MAGNEDETH 20:00, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
I think it has no problem. In fact you were a top contributor, even if it was a long time ago. -- RikkiKitsune 20:02, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Attaching a category

Should this have a category: "Users who have been top contributors of the month"? CuboneKing 22:23, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Should it? CuboneKing 18:16, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello? CuboneKing 02:49, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
I would think that would be helpful, but I don't have much say ._.--♫Green♫ギャラドス♫Talk♫ 02:51, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Ok, yes or no?! CuboneKing 23:35, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Oh, definitly. It should have one.--Smartkidhen 15:47, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
Admins? Any thoughts? CuboneKing 01:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
*facepalm* I've been waiting for an admin for so long... CuboneKing 04:31, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
no. -- MAGNEDETH 04:42, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
No, I don't personally think that that category is necessary. Virtual-Z 04:43, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
I think it's a bad idea. I think it'll just encourage more users to make lots of useless edits just to get into the top contributors and get to be in the category. It's bad enough already, that'll just make it worse. --ZestyCactus 05:07, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Yeah. Plus, every person can be accessed from the actual TCOTM page anyway. Virtual-Z 15:32, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
I don't like the idea. I don't really want to be known in a category as a TCM. Reason being is that there are many other ways to find out, such as the template's transclusion and this list. Besides, we already have too many vandals and users who perform useless edits. Turtwig A (talk | contribs) 00:01, 2 February 2010 (UTC)