Talk:Stats judge

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

Diamond and Pearl?

Short question: is he in the game? Looks like they added him in Emerald, removed him in D/P and readded him in Platinum onwards. hfc2X 08:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC)


In the Gen III section, is there any reason to have both the table and the quotes? I was almost bold enough to change it myself, but thought I should get some others' opinions first. The table adds nothing, so I really think we should cut it (and, while we're at it, go get the exact quotes from Pt and then cut that table, too, so all three Gen sections will match). Anyone agree/disagree? Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 22:07, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

I agree there is a lot of redundancy in this article (given that the ranges for each description have always been the same) and it could really benefit from some better organization overall. I just added a summary table near the top of the article, un-headered much of the Gen 3 section, and cut out some of the redundancy from Gen-specific sections in general. --Stratelier 20:05, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Official name?

Does this guy have an official name? I've never seen it. (Wondering whether the article should be tagged as {{unknown name}} or not.) --Stratelier 23:25, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

The Gen III and V iterations seem to have official names (given in the first sentence of their respective sections of this article), but it doesn't sound like the group as a whole has a name. Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 23:33, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Gen V judge assessments

When he evaluates the Pokémon, he gives a qualitative statement about their highest IV, as well as their overall potential. We don't currently have a list of all of the statements he gives, let alone the meaning behind them. I did find he said one of my Pokémon's IVs "can't be better", indicating that he can identify perfect IVs. --SnorlaxMonster 06:27, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Never mind, it's at the top of the page, rather than in each section. I saw the Gen III and VI sections had it and thought Gen IV and V were missing it. --SnorlaxMonster 06:37, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Gen VII: Stat ranges

How would you go about the stat ranges (no good, decent, average, pretty good, fantatisc, best)? I've been thinking of checking the IVs on every pokemon I have to try and see if I can find a pokemon with each value from 0 to 31 and see if I can categorize them.