Talk:Red (Adventures)/Featured article candidate

Red (Adventures)

Support (13)

• I don't think we have any mang article this detailed and big and good on the entire 'pedia. True, a very large chunk of it is the new Pokémon tables, but even they are good and informative. Also, even without those tables, this is still a good article. --electAbuzzzz 12:27, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
• Support. I like this article. It's very informational and very organized. It's not clustered, and the Pokémon images from the manga are clear. ^ht14 20:23, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
• I approve. It is one of the few good and lengthy, in a good way, manga articles. Even though it needs a few fixing here and there. But other than that it is really good, it is not clustered or bad. --☆Coolピカチュウ! 23:01, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
• I approve as well. It's informative and has some clear pictures as well. It still needs fixing though but doesn't most of the other articles need it as well? J-J-M 10:08, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
• I support this one. This is a great example of what a manga character article should be like. ZestyCactus 23:44, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
• I support because it isn't stubbish, it gives a lot of information on his Pokémon, and information on his character history. Turtwig A Contributions Talk 23:11, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
• I support this because,He`s one of the origonal manga characters.The Aura Wolf ! 23:42, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Please strike this as it has nothing to do with the article. Turtwig A Contributions Talk 00:04, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
• Sure. I think it's good enough. R.A. Hunter Blade 22:24, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
• I definately agree. As manga articles go this is exemplary. In fact, as all articles go, I think this one is excellent. I definate yes. Samjohn95 22:43, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
• I support this as a featured article. ~~Takoto - タコト 23:12, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
• It's very rich in content and is interesting. Support. UltimateSephiroth ^{(about me · chat · edits)} 22:00, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
• Support. This article is great, it's descriptive and accurate, one of the best of its kind.--♫Green♫ギャラドス♫Talk♫ 03:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
• Agree. This is surely one of the best articles yet. Alpha CuboneKing 03:29, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
• Support. Just looking through, this article exemplifies, I think, what we're trying to do - it's thorough, but easy to read and understand. Has a definite flow (beginning, middle, end). I like it. -- evkl _{(need to talk?)} 15:43, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

• This is one of the most filled manga character article! I Support it!--Maii 15:32, 21 November 2009 (UTC)Maii
• Support. It's very informative. --Darkeiya talk to me! 00:47, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Object (1)

• Creating this article was too easy. Barely any research would have to be done to gain information. I guarantee you that half of the info in this article was copied and pasted from Serebii.net--TheLastCharmander 19:39, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Try reading the info on Serebii before accusing anyone of theft. This was not taken from Serebii. --electAbuzzzz 20:01, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Besides, serebii.net can't be copy and pasted from. Turtwig A Contributions Talk 13:15, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
  • In some browsers it can. —darklordtrom 19:52, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
  • I didn't mean specifically Serebii. I'm just saying its WAY too easy to get this kind of information from outside sources. And thank you, Trom. It's good to know that an admin actually knows that an article being great isn't all about how big it is.--TheLastCharmander 20:56, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
    • I don't think he's implying that... ^ht14 21:05, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
    • He voted for the same article I did. And that article is a lot smaller than the article on Red. - unsigned comment from TheLastCharmander (talk • contribs)
    • W/E. I'm not going to argue. ^ht14 21:13, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
    • I didn't vote at all. And I'm not going to. —darklordtrom 05:04, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
    • But Trom, I can see you in the support section up there. Doesn't that count as voting for Super Effective?--TheLastCharmander 05:32, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
    • This is voting about Red. —darklordtrom 05:34, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
    • Yeah I know that. I'm talking about the voting section for Super Effective. I mean, you were the first person. Obviously you think this article is a worthy FAC.--TheLastCharmander 01:33, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Other comments

• Get a better pic of Aero (its quality is horrible when compared to other images on the article, I'm sure Aero has appeared in more than one frame) and I'll vote for it. UltimateSephiroth ^{(about me · chat · edits)} 21:41, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Done. Hope it's good enough... ^ht14 21:56, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
    • It's excellent, thanks. UltimateSephiroth ^{(about me · chat · edits)} 22:00, 6 November 2009 (UTC)