Talk:Meowth (Team Rocket)/Featured article candidate

Meowth (Team Rocket)

Support (2)

• It is a very detailed and descriptive article. Support.--Smartkidhen 23:01, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

• The article is very well built and extremely full of info. Support--Pikachuawsome

Object (6)

• Disagree. This article is decent, but by no means FAC-worthy. No movesets are done (which I'll do now), and there is no manga info. There is too much text in the summary section... not very organized... ^ht14 22:52, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

• No. It's OK, but no Featured article. It's incomplete, anyway. CuboneKing 21:11, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

• Sorry, but No. I don't see how an incomplete article can be considered for a featured article in the first place. If the Manga section was done, then I would gladly change my veiws, but... From Samjohn95 23:25, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
• lol, seriously? The {{incomplete}} followed right away by the {{FAC notice}} is hilarious.*-- Iron ICE (User:Cold)^{(page, talk)} 15:54, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
  • I'm laughin about that too. That's so ironic. ^ht14 01:43, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
    • Same here. CuboneKing 01:44, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
• While the page's character section is very descriptive, the manga section is very empty. Turtwig A (talk | contribs) 12:55, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
• Like others have said, if the article is incomplete, then how could it be a FA? Besides, the "character" section is way too long. Needs summarizing. ZestyCactus 02:42, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Other comments

It's so strange how an incomplete article is even allowed to be a FAC. CuboneKing 01:24, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

• Any page is allowed to become a FAC. Even $1.--Smartkidhen (So I saw this sign that said Red Velvet... • Team Galatic has plans!!!) 21:29, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
  • It's strange though. $1 isn't even an article anyway, and it's protected. This is incomplete. CuboneKing 21:32, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
• Why was it nominated anyways? The supporting votes say that it is full of info while this isn't full of information. Turtwig A (talk | contribs) 00:33, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Only one of the supporting votes say that it is full of info. The other says it is detailed, and descriptive. They are different. Besides, everything has room to grow on Bulbapedia. So if you're upset about incomplete articles so much, add to them.--Smartkidhen (So I saw this sign that said Red Velvet • Team Galatic has plans!) 20:47, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
    • But I am asking why it was nominated for a Featured Article, which are some of the best pages of Bulbapedia. If the article is incomplete, how is it some of the best pages of Bulbapedia? Besides, I don't read the Electric Tale of Pikachu. Turtwig A (talk | contribs) 22:31, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

• Are you happy? It just got disqualified. Check out the new featured article criteria. (But you can still nominate $1!!)--Smartkidhen (So I saw this sign that said Red Velvet • Team Galatic has plans!) 13:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Don't worry, the article may be nominated again after it is complete. Turtwig A (talk | contribs) 13:40, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I know. It'll happen someday.--Smartkidhen (So I saw this sign that said Red Velvet • Team Galatic has plans!) 13:44, 25 November 2009 (UTC)