Talk:DP145

Latest comment: 4 February 2010 by Midnight Blue in topic English title reference?

Should this be protected?

The title implies someone catches Gible. I think it should be protected to prevent users coming up with their own theories. --ケンジガール 20:16, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well, I don't think so. It seems pointless to protect a page just for that reason. has it happened yet? If not, wait for it to happen. Solar Dragon 20:18, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Yeah. I'll watch this page. Just in case. --ケンジガール 20:19, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
They must be talking about Dawn capturing Gible. Chomper4 20:50, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
And how do you know that then? Are you able to see the future? Solar Dragon 20:51, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
It's just a prediction. Chomper4 20:53, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Keep it off the talk pages and go to the forums. I'm tired of telling you this. --ケンジガール 20:54, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
I agree about taking it to the forums, but this really should be protected. ShinyPika 00:08, 8 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
We wait until someone does something stupid. We shouldn't punish good users when nothing has happened yet. Just so Chomper4 knows, putting this in <!-- --> will be counted as jumping the gun. --ケンジガール 00:15, 8 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
"Kazunari" is the only one going after Gible. --FabuVinny |Talk Page| 20:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Just so everyone knows, new information was revealed that says Ash is competing with Kuzanari for Gible, check the forums if you don't believe me. For that reason I think a limited protection is in order (if possible). Of course as far as I know (haven't checked the page's history) nothing terrible has happened, so maybe it should stay unprotected for now until a problem does arise. --Dman dustin 12:26, 9 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
If Ash will be battling that guy for Gible, we should be on the lookout for someone who says Ash will be catching Gible. Since Dragon's & Dark types have not been captured by Ash, I doubt it will happen either way. We should wait till the preview for it appears. --User:BAC510 3:50, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed Synopsis

As Ash and co. travel to Suiren Town and Dawn's next contest with their new friends Kazunari and Kotone, they encounter a wild Gible. Kazunari and Ash have both set their sights on capturing it, but who will emerge the victor? Aura-Knight 01:02, 21 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Good idea. Chomper4 16:05, 22 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Are the Air Dates in Japan Coincidental with next year's air dates?

I ask because last October Air Dates, it was a 1-hour special on 10/2/08 and a break on 10/9/08 and 1 episode on 10/16/08. Same here, just 1 day difference: 1 hour special on 10/1/09, a break on 10/8/09, and then 1 episode on 10/15/09. Is this just coincidence, or they determine this already? That would EITHER mean a break on March 18th, 2010, and a 1 hour special on the 25th of March, another one on April 1st, and then a break on April 8th. Or a special on March 18th, a break on March 25th, and a 1 hour Special on April 1st and a break on the 8th of April? User:BAC510, 06:07 28 September 2009 (UTC)

This is just a coincidence because they didn't escaped the date because they wanted to, they were forced to air it as one hour special episode because of NARUTO SHHIPPUDEN special one hour episode. This is the reason, it is just a coincidence. --♫♪Adyniz♪♫ 06:37, 28 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Makes sense then.......But then this comes up: So whenever Naruto has a 1 hour special, Pokemon is supposed to have one as well the following week? But I also find out that when either show has an hour special, the other one doesnt air that week but airs next week with 1 hour special and the other show that had the previous 1-hour special doesnt air the following week. But then I see that last year's Air Date for Pokemon & Naruto on Last year's September & October 1 hour Special's were on the same day, so how did this occur? User:BAC510, 07:13 28 September (UTC)
First of all, when naruto has a one hour special then pokemon always skip the episode of that week due to timings. Secondly, i didn't knew that last year naruto and pokemon special. I will still consider it as a coincidence but i don't have any prooves. --♫♪Adyniz♪♫ 07:20, 28 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
I am going by Bulbapedia's Air Dates for Pokemon and TV.com's Air Dates for Naruto Shippuden. I don't know if TV.com has the right air date but I clearly remember Pokemon airing on 10/2/08, since it debuted High Touch!.lol But I also remember Naruto on that day due to the whole arc with Hiidan/Kazaku Arc.:( TV.com could be wrong with the air date though, it has been almost a year since then. But I will check into it later on. User:BAC510, 08:47 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Ambi?

Was Ambipom removed from the opening and replaced with Cynda? Mamoswine Gliscor 22:56, 1 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ambipom is still there. I didn't notice Cyndaquil. --ケンジガール 23:20, 1 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sparkles

I didn't see the sparkles ... Maybe There should be a pic?Pikajoe 19:05, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Reference to EP151?

As Misty and Ash fought over possession of Totodile while Ash and Kazunari fought possession over Gible. Could you compare between those two episodes? I haven't seen the episode myself so maybe there is more comparison between the two episodes. I'm guessing? --Ashpoké 23:11, 9 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Not the same... --ケンジガール 03:09, 10 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Okay then, just thought i did.--Ashpoké 03:53, 10 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

English title reference?

Could it be "a rivalry to gamble on"? It's not an official saying but I heard it once or twice in my life.This is just a guess.--Midnight Blue 19:30, 27 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Maybe. I've heard it maybe once, but I can't find anything that references it, so it's a little hard to tell. R.A. Hunter Blade 04:28, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hm... Negatory. CuboneKing 22:21, 3 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
There is probably a pun, but we'll have to look hard into it.--Midnight Blue 01:57, 4 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, there's definitely a pun in there. I'd look it up, but I'm too lazy :| CuboneKing 02:00, 4 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Maybe it's "a rivalry to go on"--Midnight Blue 02:22, 4 February 2010 (UTC)Reply