423
edits
Talk:Roost (move): Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
→Which brings up a point...
Sk8torchic (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
::The user of Roost effectively becomes ???-type for the rest of the turn. It will have no resistances or weaknesses. However, I'm not sure if it really became ???-type in the game's data, or if it just has <b>no</b> type at all. (A possible way to test this would be either hack the ROM to make ???-type have certain weaknesses or resistances, or hack a Sky Plate Arceus with Roost and see if it changes formes after Roost.) [[User:Blueapple128|Blueapple128]] 23:29, 24 February 2009 (UTC) | ::The user of Roost effectively becomes ???-type for the rest of the turn. It will have no resistances or weaknesses. However, I'm not sure if it really became ???-type in the game's data, or if it just has <b>no</b> type at all. (A possible way to test this would be either hack the ROM to make ???-type have certain weaknesses or resistances, or hack a Sky Plate Arceus with Roost and see if it changes formes after Roost.) [[User:Blueapple128|Blueapple128]] 23:29, 24 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::HACKING CAN REALLY BE USED THAT FAR!? Man, it HAS to be hard to do, though... | :::HACKING CAN REALLY BE USED THAT FAR!? Man, it HAS to be hard to do, though... | ||
::::Someone should hack a Pokémon to be pure flying type and use it. Or just hack an Arceus to learn Roost. Would the game crash or would it just have no type?! Do we know Roost makes the Pokémon 'loose' the flying type? Maybe it just loses the weaknesses and resistances of the type (after all we can't have it use a Flying move to check for STAB if it's taking it's turn using Roost) I know it's been a little while since anyone has said anything about this but I'm still curious.. [[User:Derian|[[Derian]]]] 13:59, 22 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
