73
edits
Talk:Tangela (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
→How not notable?
Force Fire (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
By the way: Surely before edit-warring over it being added "COUNTLESS TIMES", it should have been brought up on the talk page and either left out or left in while discussion took place. Is Bulbapedia different from Wikipedia in this matter? [[User:Satorukun0530|Satorukun0530]] ([[User talk:Satorukun0530|talk]]) 12:10, 5 January 2017 (UTC) | By the way: Surely before edit-warring over it being added "COUNTLESS TIMES", it should have been brought up on the talk page and either left out or left in while discussion took place. Is Bulbapedia different from Wikipedia in this matter? [[User:Satorukun0530|Satorukun0530]] ([[User talk:Satorukun0530|talk]]) 12:10, 5 January 2017 (UTC) | ||
:Wikipedia and Bulbapedia have their own set of rules and policy, we are not one and the same. As for Tangela being the only pure Grass type in Gen I. It's the first generation/game of the franchise. Something was bound to be the first pure grass type, regardless of it being the only.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#F1912B">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#F6B775">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#5599CA">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#90BDDC">ire</span>]] 12:32, 5 January 2017 (UTC) | :Wikipedia and Bulbapedia have their own set of rules and policy, we are not one and the same. As for Tangela being the only pure Grass type in Gen I. It's the first generation/game of the franchise. Something was bound to be the first pure grass type, regardless of it being the only.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#F1912B">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#F6B775">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#5599CA">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#90BDDC">ire</span>]] 12:32, 5 January 2017 (UTC) | ||
::I would appreciate it if you replied to what I said and not what I didn't say. I did not say or even imply that I thought that Bulbapedia and Wikipedia were "one and the same". Wikipedia is very clearly stricter than Bulbapedia when it comes to things like this, so the fact that the two are different is not a reason not to include a factoid like this. If Bulbapedia doesn't have an equivalent to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BOLD,_revert,_discuss_cycle Wikipedia's BRD process], it would be nice if you would just say that; the idea that any editor can just decide that something doesn't belong in the article remove it "COUNTLESS TIMES" without ever bringing it up on the talk page is not intuitive to me. | |||
::Given that neither [[BP:TRIVIA]] nor [[BP:NOTE]] exist, and [[Bulbapedia:Notability requirements]] is about inclusion of an independent article on a topic and has nothing to say about inclusion of items in trivia lists, I don't have any policy or guideline to consult but what you direct me to, and on that point: | |||
::Your argument that it was the "first" and therefore the fact that it was the "only" one in Gen1 is not independently notable is irrelevant to my question, because the fact that it was the first pure grass type also doesn't appear to be mentioned at the moment. | |||
::[[User:Satorukun0530|Satorukun0530]] ([[User talk:Satorukun0530|talk]]) 15:08, 5 January 2017 (UTC) | |||
