3
edits
Talk:List of type combinations by abundance: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Talk:List of type combinations by abundance (view source)
Revision as of 22:29, 20 August 2016
, 20 August 2016→Unused Type Combinations
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
I would also like to see a section for unused pokemon types added. There is a demand for unused type combinations out there but, no real comprehensive list out there and we should give them what they want and add it. So can we add it now? [[User:Theenlightenedone|Theenlightenedone]] ([[User talk:Theenlightenedone|talk]]) 15:34, 20 August 2016 (UTC) | I would also like to see a section for unused pokemon types added. There is a demand for unused type combinations out there but, no real comprehensive list out there and we should give them what they want and add it. So can we add it now? [[User:Theenlightenedone|Theenlightenedone]] ([[User talk:Theenlightenedone|talk]]) 15:34, 20 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
:You can very easily see these by navigating to the bottom table (which is sortable) and clicking the "Total" column header to sort by the number of combinations in total. Everything with 0 in that column will be grouped together, and that's your comprehensive list. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 15:50, 20 August 2016 (UTC) | :You can very easily see these by navigating to the bottom table (which is sortable) and clicking the "Total" column header to sort by the number of combinations in total. Everything with 0 in that column will be grouped together, and that's your comprehensive list. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 15:50, 20 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
::I know but something visual like the stuff above would be nice as well but, also something with a trivia section noting which ones are a unique type that only exist as Megas, Legendaries, or Alolan ford and don't have their own regular pokemon line. Does that make sense? | |||
== Volcanion == | == Volcanion == | ||
