2,575
edits
Talk:U: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
→Why?: sig image removal
m (→Why?: sig image removal) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Why?== | ==Why?== | ||
Why delete this? [[User:TinaTheKirlia|<span style="color:#E75480;">Tina</span>]][[User talk:TinaTheKirlia|<span style="color:#E75480;">The</span>]][[Kirlia (Pokémon)|<span style="color:#E75480;">Kirlia</span>]] ♥ 01:20, 2 October 2007 (UTC) | Why delete this? [[User:TinaTheKirlia|<span style="color:#E75480;">Tina</span>]][[User talk:TinaTheKirlia|<span style="color:#E75480;">The</span>]][[Kirlia (Pokémon)|<span style="color:#E75480;">Kirlia</span>]] ♥ 01:20, 2 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
:Because it's junk. NO ONE at all wants to read about a glitched {{p|Charizard}}. By that standard, why not have a seperate article for EVERY Pokémon that can be caught using the Mew glitch? I say merge it with the trivia on the Pokémon's page. It's far too trivial to warrant its own article. Even then, a glitch Pokémon should only have some reference on here if it's especially notable in some way, and then I think they should all be combined into one article, "Glitch Pokémon." - | :Because it's junk. NO ONE at all wants to read about a glitched {{p|Charizard}}. By that standard, why not have a seperate article for EVERY Pokémon that can be caught using the Mew glitch? I say merge it with the trivia on the Pokémon's page. It's far too trivial to warrant its own article. Even then, a glitch Pokémon should only have some reference on here if it's especially notable in some way, and then I think they should all be combined into one article, "Glitch Pokémon." -[[User:Politoed666|<span style="color:#30D5C8">Politoed</span>]][[User talk:Politoed666|<span style="color:#FF69B4">666</span>]] | ||
::The fact that no one else has a vendetta against glitch Pokémon suggests that you can't talk for everyone. Some people happen find it interesting and the glitch category has been around for two years without a fuss. Also, why are you targeting the ''good'' quality articles? --[[User:Fabu-Vinny|FabuVinny]] <sup>[[User talk:Fabu-Vinny|T]]-[[Special:Contributions/Fabu-Vinny|C]]-[[User:Fabu-Vinny/Sandbox|S]]</sup> 02:16, 2 October 2007 (UTC) | ::The fact that no one else has a vendetta against glitch Pokémon suggests that you can't talk for everyone. Some people happen find it interesting and the glitch category has been around for two years without a fuss. Also, why are you targeting the ''good'' quality articles? --[[User:Fabu-Vinny|FabuVinny]] <sup>[[User talk:Fabu-Vinny|T]]-[[Special:Contributions/Fabu-Vinny|C]]-[[User:Fabu-Vinny/Sandbox|S]]</sup> 02:16, 2 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
