User talk:Maverick Nate/Archives/8: Difference between revisions

From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
Line 653: Line 653:
::::I'm not saying every pokémon in the set will be Dragon-type (If they include Kingdra as dragon-type for example, of course the horsea and seadra won't be Dragon-type). Still, every pokémon that is at least part-Dragon will most likely be featured with the new Dragon-type because that's the focus of the set. It's not confirmed, but it's obvious. But whatever, I was just editing in advance. When the set gets out, we'll see... [[User:Metalizard|Metalizard]] 22:41, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
::::I'm not saying every pokémon in the set will be Dragon-type (If they include Kingdra as dragon-type for example, of course the horsea and seadra won't be Dragon-type). Still, every pokémon that is at least part-Dragon will most likely be featured with the new Dragon-type because that's the focus of the set. It's not confirmed, but it's obvious. But whatever, I was just editing in advance. When the set gets out, we'll see... [[User:Metalizard|Metalizard]] 22:41, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
::::At least, the pure-dragon types could have the symbol next to them, nah? [[User:Metalizard|Metalizard]] 22:44, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
::::At least, the pure-dragon types could have the symbol next to them, nah? [[User:Metalizard|Metalizard]] 22:44, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
:::::No. The TCG does not follow the game typing rules. Example? Water type Lugia. ''[[User:Maverick Nate|<sup style="color:#00008B;">'''Maverick'''</sup>]][[User talk:Maverick Nate|<sub style="color:#00008B;">'''Nate'''</sub>]]'' 22:48, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Navigation menu