1,268
edits
m (→94 gone?) |
m (→94 gone?) |
||
Line 513: | Line 513: | ||
um you just deleted a whole article on the glitch pokemon 94 that took me a hour to write, dont get what "''Gameshark only Gen I Pokemon don't get articles''" means. --[[User:Rsrdaman|Rsrdaman]] 02:59, 3 May 2011 (UTC) | um you just deleted a whole article on the glitch pokemon 94 that took me a hour to write, dont get what "''Gameshark only Gen I Pokemon don't get articles''" means. --[[User:Rsrdaman|Rsrdaman]] 02:59, 3 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
:It means that if you can't encounter it without the use of a cheating device (any third-party device that must be plugged into the Game Boy), then it isn't notable enough for an article. This is because Gen I was so glitchy that there are too many glitches without cheating devices. Also, I suggest that in future when creating articles, check that there isn't a note above the editing pane that the article has previously been deleted. 94 had been deleted previously as it was not notable. <span class="sc">[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</span> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 03:05, 3 May 2011 (UTC) | :It means that if you can't encounter it without the use of a cheating device (any third-party device that must be plugged into the Game Boy), then it isn't notable enough for an article. This is because Gen I was so glitchy that there are too many glitches without cheating devices. Also, I suggest that in future when creating articles, check that there isn't a note above the editing pane that the article has previously been deleted. 94 had been deleted previously as it was not notable. <span class="sc">[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</span> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 03:05, 3 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
::then why are there any articles on on cheat only glitch pokemon?(the non-bold ones) |
edits