Category talk:Z-Crystals
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Form-changing items category
I don't see how this was a controversial addition. Z-Crystals change Arceus' form just like Plates do, and Plates are uncontroversially in the category. Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 03:29, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
- Agreed. Even the individual Z-Crystals are categorized under that category. I don't see why the main page must be an exception. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 03:38, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
- Uncontroversial does not equal obvious. All I could think of for why it was added was "Zenith Marshadow", and that certainly wouldn't warrant the category. Arceus is kind of a weird case I haven't really remembered. Tiddlywinks (talk) 03:57, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
- I see you just undid your original reversion. So...what's it supposed to be? Categorized or uncategorized? I'm getting mixed signals here. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 04:03, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
- Tiddlywinks' comment above clearly sounds to me like they are conceding the point, and that they have realized it should be categorized after all. I don't see any mixed signals at all. Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 04:08, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
- I say this because this message and the aforementioned reversion were done at almost the same time. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 05:48, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
- I still don't understand why you're confused. Tiddlywinks had initially not understood why the category was added, so they removed it. After I explained why it's justified, Tiddlywinks conceded the point and, as a result, restored the category. Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 05:52, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
- Ditto. I don't know what's confusing either. (And I'm not sure it matters.)
- Long story short, everything's correct now. Don't overthink it. Tiddlywinks (talk) 05:59, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
- I still don't understand why you're confused. Tiddlywinks had initially not understood why the category was added, so they removed it. After I explained why it's justified, Tiddlywinks conceded the point and, as a result, restored the category. Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 05:52, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
- I say this because this message and the aforementioned reversion were done at almost the same time. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 05:48, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
- Tiddlywinks' comment above clearly sounds to me like they are conceding the point, and that they have realized it should be categorized after all. I don't see any mixed signals at all. Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 04:08, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
- I see you just undid your original reversion. So...what's it supposed to be? Categorized or uncategorized? I'm getting mixed signals here. GrammarFreak01 (talk) 04:03, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
- Uncontroversial does not equal obvious. All I could think of for why it was added was "Zenith Marshadow", and that certainly wouldn't warrant the category. Arceus is kind of a weird case I haven't really remembered. Tiddlywinks (talk) 03:57, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
