Talk:Item: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Yes, you can see what it looks like in Fr/Lg (and probably emerald too). Also, is it ok to add items one by one, or should they be added section by section? | Yes, you can see what it looks like in Fr/Lg (and probably emerald too). Also, is it ok to add items one by one, or should they be added section by section? | ||
---- | |||
In what games is Lemonade avaliable in? {{User:Jellochuu/s}} 22:34, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:34, 20 March 2005
I believe some/all items should have individual pages, as well as this easy-view page. There's a hell of a lot you can say for one item. - Ferret 00:48, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Define items that would warrant more than a paragraph. Evkl 01:02, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
I believe a lot can be said of Rare Candy, for one. Definitive places to get particular items too would be especially useful. - Ferret
That's actually not a bad idea. A summary of what they do, where you can get it, what it looks like, there's a lot you can say about any particular item. surskitty
Does anyone really care what the items look like? Can't someone figure out what an Escape Rope looks like, and such? I agree that maybe some of the more important items should have their own pages, but a lot don't need it. Evkl 05:33, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Maybe there should be an extra level of sorting in the Item List: by Bag placement. There could be a separate section for Hold Items, Key Items, and Regular Items. Just a suggestion.CastformRED
Yes, you can see what it looks like in Fr/Lg (and probably emerald too). Also, is it ok to add items one by one, or should they be added section by section?
In what games is Lemonade avaliable in? User:Jellochuu/s 22:34, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
