Talk:Chip Away (move): Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (moved Talk:Little by Little (move) to Talk:Chip Away (move)) |
Stratelier (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
It's not affected by evasion, the article says, this and the fact that it says "100%" accuracy on the infobox leads me to believe that it is affected by accuracy. If so, I think it should be mentioned in the article. Though I'm not sure if it is or not. [[User:Malake256|Malake256]] 21:51, 18 December 2010 (UTC) | It's not affected by evasion, the article says, this and the fact that it says "100%" accuracy on the infobox leads me to believe that it is affected by accuracy. If so, I think it should be mentioned in the article. Though I'm not sure if it is or not. [[User:Malake256|Malake256]] 21:51, 18 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
: I agree. Moves that cannot miss generally say "---" accuracy to differentiate them from moves with 100% accuracy, but this needs to be tested (in both G5 and G6) to confirm. --''[[User:Stratelier|Stratelier]]'' 23:47, 3 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:47, 3 December 2013
Accuracy
It's not affected by evasion, the article says, this and the fact that it says "100%" accuracy on the infobox leads me to believe that it is affected by accuracy. If so, I think it should be mentioned in the article. Though I'm not sure if it is or not. Malake256 21:51, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. Moves that cannot miss generally say "---" accuracy to differentiate them from moves with 100% accuracy, but this needs to be tested (in both G5 and G6) to confirm. --Stratelier 23:47, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
