User talk:electAbuzzzz/Archive 2
| Please leave new messages at the bottom of this page. |
Can you please delete this?
Hi ElectAbuzzz, could you possibly delete User:Silver Eevee/Template:User Watches Horse Racing? I was using it as a test, and I no longer need it. Thanks Silver Eevee talk? contribs! 09:22, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- Done --electAbuzzzz 09:28, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks! Silver Eevee talk? contribs! 08:35, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Your edits
AIM says you're offline, even though I can see you're not, so I can't send messages. I like the improvements you made to the new welcome box. The top line, about the BP:Welcome page, is still bugging me though...any ideas? -- evkl (need to talk?) 14:11, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
its ok u can delete the page about R.O.B im new at this so can u teach me please - unsigned comment from Arceus99 (talk • contribs)
.4
You can unprotect the page. I will not revert the edit again. I say this grudgingly and unwillingly, with only the promise of being blocked should I do anything of the sort again preventing me from doing anything of the sort again, true, but I will still not revert the edit. Missingno. Master wants YOU! Join the Order of the Glitch! (my talk page) 20:59, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Why?
Why did you erase some pages? I worked really long on that Legendary Golem page and now have you deleted it?! I saw that it did'nt meet notability requirements, but you could change it so that it would meet that requirements? It was my first page too so I was very proud of it. I thought it was a good page...--MeDeoPal 21:15, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
- Uh, it's not that the page didn't meet requirements. The subject of the page didn't meet requirements. The Regi trio from the movie simply weren't notable to warrant their own article. Missingno. Master wants YOU! Join the Order of the Glitch! (my talk page) 21:22, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
- OK, first - please don't take it personally. I mean that. There was nothing wrong with the article itself. For a first creation, it was good. However, we have a notability policy for these things, and if you read it, you'll see why that article wasn't enough. You have to understand that there's a history behind that policy and there are reasons why it exists. We prefer to make existing articles better and longer and fill them with real content, rather than create many stubs. So, the information from that article wasn't lost - I copied the text to the respective Regis pages (see the anime sections of Regirock, Regice, and Registeel). Don't worry, you'll have other articles... --electAbuzzzz 21:28, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
- I now understand, thank you.--MeDeoPal 21:31, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
- OK, first - please don't take it personally. I mean that. There was nothing wrong with the article itself. For a first creation, it was good. However, we have a notability policy for these things, and if you read it, you'll see why that article wasn't enough. You have to understand that there's a history behind that policy and there are reasons why it exists. We prefer to make existing articles better and longer and fill them with real content, rather than create many stubs. So, the information from that article wasn't lost - I copied the text to the respective Regis pages (see the anime sections of Regirock, Regice, and Registeel). Don't worry, you'll have other articles... --electAbuzzzz 21:28, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Template
See here. I'd prefer not to write it out so many times. You can reply here though. ht14 21:26, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, I'm not really great with coding. Especially tables. Trom will take care of it when he has the time. --electAbuzzzz 21:32, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Uh...
Any particular reason you got rid of the used moves templates on the List of Shiny Pokémon in the anime? Missingno. Master wants YOU! Join the Order of the Glitch! (my talk page) 00:09, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, a very particular reason: it looked awful like that. The
{{trainerpkmn}}template was meant to be used in a row, not cut by section headers and other stuff. For Ash's Noctowl and the Red Gyarados, there's a main article; no reason to list the moves again. For Magikarp, it was completely pointless to have that template list one move (Splash. Gee, really?), using the same picture as JUST above it. All in all, it was pointless and ugly. --electAbuzzzz 00:16, 13 August 2009 (UTC)- Oh. I guess I shouldn't have re-added it before checking for your response. But still, there should be something that can be done... I think it just makes sense to have the moves listed on the page for each Pokémon. And still, there could be another way to list the shinies that appeared in the anime without that particular template, right? Missingno. Master wants YOU! Join the Order of the Glitch! (my talk page) 00:21, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yes. There could be. The way it used to be before you created that page. And yes, you shoul've waited for my response. That's the whole point of using talk pages. MM, seriously, you're on a tight rope with me. Stop reverting admins just because you disagree with them. Next time you revert a staff member without approval, you WILL be blocked. --electAbuzzzz 00:24, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oh. I guess I shouldn't have re-added it before checking for your response. But still, there should be something that can be done... I think it just makes sense to have the moves listed on the page for each Pokémon. And still, there could be another way to list the shinies that appeared in the anime without that particular template, right? Missingno. Master wants YOU! Join the Order of the Glitch! (my talk page) 00:21, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
