Talk:List of mutually exclusive Pokémon

Forms

Rotom forms are mutually exclusive in generation IV if I remember correctly.--Rocket Grunt (Report To Me) 14:01, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

I haven't tried, but since its egg group is Amorphous and not no eggs, wouldn't the player be able to breed multiple Rotom and give them all different forms if they wanted? --celadonk (talk) 15:33, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

I've checked the Platinum. By changing form you take the appliance from the room making it impossible to own more than one of the same appliance form.--Rocket Grunt (Report To Me) 17:40, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

You might be misunderstanding "mutually exclusive"... it means you can't own multiple different Pokemon at the same time, not that you can't own more than one of the same kind at the same time. Check if you can get, for example, a Heat Rotom and a Wash Rotom, rather than two Heat Rotoms. --celadonk (talk) 21:08, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

I know it's something different just wasn't sure how it works.--Rocket Grunt (Report To Me) 21:30, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

The criteria for mutually exclusive should not be whether you can have the ultimate "living dex", anyway. If you can change Rotom whenever you want, there's nothing exclusive about any form. Tiddlywinks (talk) 23:23, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Cosplay Pikachu

Does this really count as "mutually exclusive"? Sure, you can only get one Cosplay Pikachu in the game, but you can change its form at will into the others. It's like claiming that Giratina is mutually exclusive because you can't get both Alternate and Origin form without trading. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 23:08, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

I agree, but will wait for more opinions, it's essentially the same as saying all Arecus's forms are mutually exclusive as you can only get one per game usually. --Spriteit (talk) 23:17, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

I agree as well. There has to be no access to free change--KnightGalarie (talk) 23:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Double bold

Am I the only one who sees Pokemon's names double bolded? Once from triple apostrophe and second from exclamation mark cell.--Rocket Grunt (Report To Me) 10:59, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Alright, I removed the triple apostrophes now, since they seemed to be redundant anyway. Since you asked, I wasn't really seeing anything double bolded. At least in my case, the text was simply bold because of the table header (the exclamation mark cell), and the additional triple apostrophes didn't visibly make it any bolder to me. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 15:42, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

I use Mozilla Firefox, maybe because of this the difference is visible. Same thing happens for generation number on move list on pages of types.--Rocket Grunt (Report To Me) 17:39, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

That's interesting. As you said, maybe because of this the difference is visible. The difference was not visible on my Google Chrome. I think it should be fixed now since I removed the triple apostrophes (at least from this page). --Daniel Carrero (talk) 18:26, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks.--Rocket Grunt (Report To Me) 18:39, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

No problem. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 18:49, 21 June 2020 (UTC)