Talk:Ho-Oh (anime)

It rather looks more shiny than the normal form.. does anyone think the same, or am I just insane? TinaTheKirlia ♥ File:281MS.gif 00:14, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

The glow obscures the actual colouring of Ho-Oh (possibly intentionally since the first episode aired two and a half years before GS came out). Ho-Oh is shown normally in the Ecruteak City episodes and is certainly in its normal colouration there. --FabuVinny ^T-C-S 00:53, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Ah, I see. I've never really watched the episodes so I didn't know XD TinaTheKirlia ♥ File:281MS.gif 01:17, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

I still say it looks shiny. I mean, it sparkles like Ash's Noctowl does, and Noctowl's shiny! --File:Spr 3e 059.gifFile:Spr 3e 132.gifTheryguy512 File:Trozeiani025.gif 12:16, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Gender

I don't think Ho-oh's gender should be "none" since it's unknown if genderless Pokemon apply in the anime, and therefore, not 100% confirmed. In fact i think it's very unlikely that it's genderless since there was a female (mother) Lugia in the series, so it should be "Unknown" (GT4GTR 11:23, 16 June 2008 (UTC))

I agree. I think Legendary Pokémon in the anime have genders. I don't know why, but i guess that they didn't want to give most of the legendary Pokémon genders in the games so people couldn't breed them some how? Or maybe because it would cause a bit of controversy as to how the species reproduce in the wild?--いぬみみ01:28, 26 July 2008 (UTC)