User talk:Flain: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Force Fire (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
:Problem with this warning: I only undid the edit once. I changed a piece of trivia my edit was undone and I undid that. I'm pretty sure doing something once isn't continually. Also since all Pokémon hatch from eggs it doesn't need to be confirmed that Ash's Frogadier (I view the events of episodes that haven't aired here in America yet as taking place in the future) hatched from an egg because it basically confirmed long before the XY series. So no, it's not valid. It's like saying Ash's Pikachu was never a Pichu since Ash obtained him before his pre evolved form was introduced. | :Problem with this warning: I only undid the edit once. I changed a piece of trivia my edit was undone and I undid that. I'm pretty sure doing something once isn't continually. Also since all Pokémon hatch from eggs it doesn't need to be confirmed that Ash's Frogadier (I view the events of episodes that haven't aired here in America yet as taking place in the future) hatched from an egg because it basically confirmed long before the XY series. So no, it's not valid. It's like saying Ash's Pikachu was never a Pichu since Ash obtained him before his pre evolved form was introduced. | ||
::You removed it, got reverted and removed it again. That's the continually part, the edit-warring was more of a precautionary warning. And the Pikachu example is exactly the case. The Pikachu's infobox doesn't say "Pikachu spent X amount as a Pichu" because he was '''never''' a Pichu since Pichu was introduced before Pikachu. Like I said, the Kanto quartet were introduced before eggs were a thing, so they're exempt from the whole "All Pokémon hatch from eggs" until it is proven that they've come from eggs (because no eggs in Gen I).--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#AB2813">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#C87365">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#26649C">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#729ABF">ire</span>]] 04:56, 13 December 2015 (UTC) | ::You removed it, got reverted and removed it again. That's the continually part, the edit-warring was more of a precautionary warning. And the Pikachu example is exactly the case. The Pikachu's infobox doesn't say "Pikachu spent X amount as a Pichu" because he was '''never''' a Pichu since Pichu was introduced before Pikachu. Like I said, the Kanto quartet were introduced before eggs were a thing, so they're exempt from the whole "All Pokémon hatch from eggs" until it is proven that they've come from eggs (because no eggs in Gen I).--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#AB2813">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#C87365">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#26649C">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#729ABF">ire</span>]] 04:56, 13 December 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::Dude your logic is terrible and you're starting to make me question your intelligence. Or at least your level of common sense. | |||
Revision as of 07:22, 13 December 2015
| Welcome to Bulbapedia, Flain! | |
By creating your account you are now able to edit pages, join discussions, and expand the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia. Before you jump in, here are some ground rules:
| |
Thank you, and have a good time editing here! → PikaTepig999 18:40, 1 December 2015 (UTC) |
Edit warring
Please don't just continually revert edits, it falls under Edit warring. If you disagree with an edit, discuss it with the user that reverted you or on the talk page of the article. I've already given my reason plenty of time why it's notable, those that say "all Pokémon hatch from eggs" didn't read the trivia properly. It is Ash's first starter Pokémon to have beenconfirmed to hatch from an egg, not his first overall. Squirtle, Bulbasaur, and Charizard and Pikachu were introduced before eggs (or breeding) were a thing, so it's valid.--ForceFire 04:02, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
- Problem with this warning: I only undid the edit once. I changed a piece of trivia my edit was undone and I undid that. I'm pretty sure doing something once isn't continually. Also since all Pokémon hatch from eggs it doesn't need to be confirmed that Ash's Frogadier (I view the events of episodes that haven't aired here in America yet as taking place in the future) hatched from an egg because it basically confirmed long before the XY series. So no, it's not valid. It's like saying Ash's Pikachu was never a Pichu since Ash obtained him before his pre evolved form was introduced.
- You removed it, got reverted and removed it again. That's the continually part, the edit-warring was more of a precautionary warning. And the Pikachu example is exactly the case. The Pikachu's infobox doesn't say "Pikachu spent X amount as a Pichu" because he was never a Pichu since Pichu was introduced before Pikachu. Like I said, the Kanto quartet were introduced before eggs were a thing, so they're exempt from the whole "All Pokémon hatch from eggs" until it is proven that they've come from eggs (because no eggs in Gen I).--ForceFire 04:56, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
- Dude your logic is terrible and you're starting to make me question your intelligence. Or at least your level of common sense.
- You removed it, got reverted and removed it again. That's the continually part, the edit-warring was more of a precautionary warning. And the Pikachu example is exactly the case. The Pikachu's infobox doesn't say "Pikachu spent X amount as a Pichu" because he was never a Pichu since Pichu was introduced before Pikachu. Like I said, the Kanto quartet were introduced before eggs were a thing, so they're exempt from the whole "All Pokémon hatch from eggs" until it is proven that they've come from eggs (because no eggs in Gen I).--ForceFire 04:56, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
