Talk:Geosenge Town: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
I was just about to start one, since this is the closest it has to an article, and its role in the plot and the history of Kalos is enough to warrant one. Additionally, more information can be added while stripping this article of spoilers. But the main reason I ask is... well, since it's never referred to by its proper name, the article's title would have no capitals, which looks a bit silly. Which is a strange reason to consider keeping it as a subsection inside this article, I realize... --[[User:Pie|Pie]] <sup>~[[User talk:Pie|♪]][[Special:Contributions/Pie|♫]]</sup> 23:43, 25 April 2014 (UTC) | I was just about to start one, since this is the closest it has to an article, and its role in the plot and the history of Kalos is enough to warrant one. Additionally, more information can be added while stripping this article of spoilers. But the main reason I ask is... well, since it's never referred to by its proper name, the article's title would have no capitals, which looks a bit silly. Which is a strange reason to consider keeping it as a subsection inside this article, I realize... --[[User:Pie|Pie]] <sup>~[[User talk:Pie|♪]][[Special:Contributions/Pie|♫]]</sup> 23:43, 25 April 2014 (UTC) | ||
:I agree that it seems notable enough to get its own article, and not having a capitalized name is no reason to avoid making an article. (I'm specifically recalling the capitalization discussions on [[Talk:Berry fields]], although they're not totally relevant here...) [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 04:09, 26 April 2014 (UTC) | :I agree that it seems notable enough to get its own article, and not having a capitalized name is no reason to avoid making an article. (I'm specifically recalling the capitalization discussions on [[Talk:Berry fields]], although they're not totally relevant here...) [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 04:09, 26 April 2014 (UTC) | ||
::Mm, the fields discussion is sorta relevant, but not completely -- a group of fields don't necessarily need a proper noun as a name, whereas a one-of-a-kind ultimate weapon should, but canon still trumps all. Maybe if it's titled "Ultimate weapon" rather than "The ultimate weapon", it'll look less... strange? Even though I believe it always has that article in front in the games. --[[User:Pie|Pie]] <sup>~[[User talk:Pie|♪]][[Special:Contributions/Pie|♫]]</sup> 06:24, 26 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:24, 26 April 2014
Name is based on Ginseng? In what way? Geosenge really just seems to be based on Geo and Stonehenge.
Erikhogue (talk) 12:03, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- Same way Siebold is derived from sea, mayhap? --The Truth aka Relicant 12:12, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- Relicant, that point has nothing to do with this article. Don't bring it up here. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 12:36, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- My point was... Ginseng is pronounced+spelt similar to Geosenge, similar to how sea is pronounced and spelt similar to the "sie" in Siebold. Stop throwing that stupid accusation around. --The Truth aka Relicant 12:41, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- You should already know that just being pronounced/spelt similarly is not enough; Siebold has "sea" as a name origin because he's a Water-type specialist. However, since Kalos cities and towns seem to have a plant theme (how original...), I think we can keep "ginseng".--電禅Den Zen 12:56, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- My point was... Ginseng is pronounced+spelt similar to Geosenge, similar to how sea is pronounced and spelt similar to the "sie" in Siebold. Stop throwing that stupid accusation around. --The Truth aka Relicant 12:41, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- Relicant, that point has nothing to do with this article. Don't bring it up here. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 12:36, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Separate article for the ultimate weapon?
I was just about to start one, since this is the closest it has to an article, and its role in the plot and the history of Kalos is enough to warrant one. Additionally, more information can be added while stripping this article of spoilers. But the main reason I ask is... well, since it's never referred to by its proper name, the article's title would have no capitals, which looks a bit silly. Which is a strange reason to consider keeping it as a subsection inside this article, I realize... --Pie ~♪♫ 23:43, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- I agree that it seems notable enough to get its own article, and not having a capitalized name is no reason to avoid making an article. (I'm specifically recalling the capitalization discussions on Talk:Berry fields, although they're not totally relevant here...) Pumpkinking0192 (talk) 04:09, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
- Mm, the fields discussion is sorta relevant, but not completely -- a group of fields don't necessarily need a proper noun as a name, whereas a one-of-a-kind ultimate weapon should, but canon still trumps all. Maybe if it's titled "Ultimate weapon" rather than "The ultimate weapon", it'll look less... strange? Even though I believe it always has that article in front in the games. --Pie ~♪♫ 06:24, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
