Talk:List of Pokémon that are not part of an evolutionary line: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Vuvuzela2010 (talk | contribs) (old convo and new convo) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
? --[[User:BeeBwakka|<span style="color:#52D017">Bee § Bwakka♂</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:BeeBwakka|<span style="color:#157DEC">meh talk</span>]])''</small> 17:44, 24 November 2010 (UTC) | ? --[[User:BeeBwakka|<span style="color:#52D017">Bee § Bwakka♂</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:BeeBwakka|<span style="color:#157DEC">meh talk</span>]])''</small> 17:44, 24 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
==Former== | |||
:A list of Pokemon formerly not part of an evolutionary line wouldnt be fine, should it be listed here or on their own page? <small><span style="color:white; background-color:#007FFF">'''X'''</span>[[User:Vuvuzela2010|<span style="color:#007FFF; background-color:white">'''Vuvuzela2010''']]</span><span style="color:white; background-color:#007FFF">'''X'''</span></small> 01:39, 28 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:39, 28 June 2011
Should this be moved to Pokémon not involved in evolution? The current title would allow fully evolved ones to be added to the list. It's Turtwig A! My talk or wiki edits 22:34, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Moved elsewhere. Similar, but elsewhere. —darklordtrom 10:16, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Is it important to add that in generation I there were 13 others who couldn't evolve?
? --Bee § Bwakka♂ (meh talk) 17:44, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Former
- A list of Pokemon formerly not part of an evolutionary line wouldnt be fine, should it be listed here or on their own page? XVuvuzela2010X 01:39, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
