Talk:First partner Pokémon/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:15, 24 January 2009

This article is very informative of each starter of all the games as well as in other media. --ケンジの ガール 07:33, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
The article is quite good, compared to some others. It relates to both games and anime quite well, unlike some others.--Wowy 07:36, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
After going through it for a while, I've decided that it does indeed deserve to be a Featured Article. It's very informative.--K kl l nn blastoise 23:55, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Support --Guardian of Earth |SGMS 2010
Support; This article is good well written "ehh.." trivia but still a good article.--☆Coolピカチュウ! 07:49, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
I think the article is quite interesting, and it is about most aspects of Pokémon (Games, Anime, Ect...) Elliot 08:59, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

While I do like this article, I feel it's a little too much of a list to be featured. First it's a long list of starters in the games, then it's a ridiculously long list of trivia points... --electAbuzzzz ^(TALK) 09:28, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Ditto to the above. There are much better articles out there. Aura-Knight 15:57, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Agreed. It's good, but too much of a list to be considered featured. Arceus548 17:49, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
There are some problems I noticed with it too - such as the fact it still claimed that Jessie's Arbok was a gift from Giovanni, while that comment was removed from the main article years ago. If that error was still in there, I wouldn't be surprised if there are other little errors it has that I didn't see. If this is to become a featured article, it needs to be less of a list, and it should have a thorough clean up. Right now, it's not featured material. Satosuke 14:23, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Agree with electAbuzzzz here.--Dib y
Definitely not. You call this a featured article? It's OK, but it's too plain to be one of the best. User:Dusknoir477 17:16, 24 Januray 2009 (UTC)

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 * There are some problems I noticed with it too - such as the fact it still claimed that Jessie's Arbok was a gift from Giovanni, while that comment was removed from the [[Jessie's Arbok|main article]] years ago.  If that error was still in there, I wouldn't be surprised if there are other little errors it has that I didn't see.  If this is to become a featured article, it needs to be less of a list, and it should have a thorough clean up.  Right now, it's not featured material.  [[User:Kumori Satosuke|Satosuke]] 14:23, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 *Agree with {{u|electAbuzzzz}} here.--'''[[User:Diby|<span style="color:#6890F0;">D</span><span style="color:#F08030;">i</span>]]'''[[User talk:Diby|<span style="color:#78C850;">b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Diby|<span style="color:#F8D030;">y</span>]]
-*Definitely not. You call this a featured article? It's OK, but it's too plain to be one of the best. [[User: Dusknoir]] 17:16, 24 Januray 2009 (UTC)
+*Definitely not. You call this a featured article? It's OK, but it's too plain to be one of the best. [[User:Dusknoir477]] 17:16, 24 Januray 2009 (UTC)
 ====Other comments====